Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

'85-'86.5 Sharkvent Install Question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2012, 12:52 PM
  #31  
Eplebnista
Rennlist Member
 
Eplebnista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 1,679
Received 325 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

There must be a cheaper and simpler solution.
Cheaper - not simpler. You have to fabricate a mount, figure out the plumbing and drill and tap a fitting into the oil pan.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/MOR-85400/
Old 04-27-2012, 01:41 PM
  #32  
Alan
Electron Wrangler
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 13,426
Received 422 Likes on 289 Posts
Default

Plus there is the fact that to install that kind of baffle you have to remove the intake - which adds rather a lot to the expense/hassle factor. Even if you do it all yourself you'd want to do some intake refresh items...

I do have the 928 Intl baffle plate - I also have modified my oil filler to open up the bottom cavities, add a new deflector plate with side wings - stuff it full of copper scrubbies and add a big filler vent to my Provent. Seems to work OK - however - the scrubbie filled filler stack with the provent plumbing in the bottom of the fill port makes filling a nightmare - you need to bung the provent feed and the oil fill rate is now so slow its just impractical to use...

I eventually added a new oil filler line direct to the sump in the old style location (where there is just a flat on the new sump top...). Nothing is ever as simple as you might wish for...

Alan
Old 04-27-2012, 07:01 PM
  #33  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Without a proper seperator with an atmosphere vented solution you will then have oil covering the outside of the intake instead.....




Let me know how that works out for yea......
Not if you are willing to make one of these!
Attached Images   
Old 04-27-2012, 07:06 PM
  #34  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan
.......I do have the 928 Intl baffle plate - I also have modified my oil filler to open up the bottom cavities, add a new deflector plate with side wings - stuff it full of copper scrubbies and add a big filler vent to my Provent. Seems to work OK - however - the scrubbie filled filler stack with the provent plumbing in the bottom of the fill port makes filling a nightmare - you need to bung the provent feed and the oil fill rate is now so slow its just impractical to use......
+928

Rate of fill goes down to 1gallon/hr. Took me 2 hrs to fill the car.
Old 04-27-2012, 10:48 PM
  #35  
Shane
Sharkaholic
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 5,162
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You're right Imre, it doesn't need to be a Sharkvent, or a Provent, to keep oil out of the intake. It can be a cheap collection of hoses, fittings and a 5quart catch can to have the same results. However for this particular car I decided that DR's Sharkvent fit with my overall intentions for this 928. It is not likely that I will keep this one for myself, so in order for it to be appealling to a large group of potential buyers, I opted for the system that uses Porsche hoses, clamps, fittings and a very efficient seperator, pre-plumbed back to the oil sump kit. Bonus is that it has an installation manual so that the future owner/mechanic can uninstall/reinstall its' components when conducting repairs.
Old 04-27-2012, 11:07 PM
  #36  
ramcram
Rennlist Member
 
ramcram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 84 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

The boot are not too short. The extra space on the 'T' is to hold ALL of he boot whilst the plenem is installed, then the boot is slid out to the rib [stop point] on the plenem.
I cut some longer silicone boots to do what you suggest but couldn't fit them.

Originally Posted by PC-85-928S
Dam!
Does everyone powdercoat the central T, and not realize you need to go all the way to the end, because the rubber boot is not long enough!
I did the same thing! How come no one mentions that in their powder coating tips!
I spoke to the person on ebay who makes the aftermarket silicone boots.
She said she may be able to make one longer, which could fix that powdercoating situation.
Maybe slightly longer boots would fix the situation with the torque rings.
Old 05-02-2012, 01:52 PM
  #37  
PC-85-928S
Rennlist Member
 
PC-85-928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 889
Received 133 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I was considering buying a Sharkvent for my 85 US.
I sent an email to 928GT, to see if they were going to address this issue, but I did not hear back from them.
Old 05-02-2012, 02:30 PM
  #38  
Cosmo Kramer
Rennlist Member
 
Cosmo Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,656
Received 177 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Without a proper seperator with an atmosphere vented solution you will then have oil covering the outside of the intake instead.....




Let me know how that works out for yea......
+1 I tried the generic catch can thing and ended up with a Provent as I had issues with the can overflowing with the oil when the oil level in the pan was on the high side of the normal range on the stick, plus draining it was a royal PITA. I didn't do the full Sharkvent system, I bought a Provent and did the plumbing myself. Having it drain back to the pan with the check valve is nice, I haven't touched the system for a year now after install. Routing the hose under the PS plenum is definitely challenging it is a tight squeeze.
Old 05-02-2012, 02:45 PM
  #39  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PC-85-928S
I was considering buying a Sharkvent for my 85 US.
I sent an email to 928GT, to see if they were going to address this issue, but I did not hear back from them.
Sorry I haven't gotten back to you yet, playing catch-up now that the major SITM plans/changes are done.

For clarity sake, the SharkVent System Shane has is approx 3 years old (July 2009?) and is one or the first few 85-86 Versions. The Cam Cover hose issue was caught by someone shortly after that and corrected. My apologies to Shane that we missed updating him years ago. Also, Thank you Shane very much for posting your fix, which was almost exactly what I would have suggested with that earlier system.

However, approx 2.5 years ago after a lot more feedback and testing I did a complete redesign of the SharkVent Systems that eliminated any issues with Cam Cover connections completely. This redesign made the system much more effective and even reduced the load on the ProVent Separator. The side benefit was also that simplified the system dramatically and made for an even easier installation than it already was.

Hope that helps and sorry I didn't see this thread sooner!

Dave
__________________
David Roberts
2010 Jaguar XKR Coupe - 510HP Stock - Liquid Silver Metallic
928 Owners Club Co-Founder
Rennlist 928 Forum Main Sponsor
www.928gt.com

928 Specialists on Facebook - 928Specialists
Sharks in the Mountains on Facebook - 928SITM

Old 05-02-2012, 03:23 PM
  #40  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,589
Received 2,204 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Not if you are willing to make one of these!
Very nice, any reason why you didn't drain it to the pan?

I'll be doing something similar on my cars, the 16V's have the easiest place to tap in and drain to.
Old 05-02-2012, 04:03 PM
  #41  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Very nice, any reason why you didn't drain it to the pan?

I'll be doing something similar on my cars, the 16V's have the easiest place to tap in and drain to.
I made this after seeing the cross section on this website...Works well
http://www.airwolf.com/Products_AirOilSeparators.htm

Old 05-02-2012, 04:43 PM
  #42  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Very nice, any reason why you didn't drain it to the pan?

I'll be doing something similar on my cars, the 16V's have the easiest place to tap in and drain to.
The SC bracket was already installed when I built this and it was partially blocking the front bolt of the oil pan block-off plate. I also made the entire thing a little too long. If it was a couple inches shorter, it would be easier to route a drain line. To be honest, I wasn't expecting the seperator to work as well as it did but draining it is easy, so I left it as is.
Old 05-02-2012, 05:17 PM
  #43  
Shane
Sharkaholic
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 5,162
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DR
Sorry I haven't gotten back to you yet, playing catch-up now that the major SITM plans/changes are done.

For clarity sake, the SharkVent System Shane has is approx 3 years old (July 2009?) and is one or the first few 85-86 Versions. The Cam Cover hose issue was caught by someone shortly after that and corrected. My apologies to Shane that we missed updating him years ago. Also, Thank you Shane very much for posting your fix, which was almost exactly what I would have suggested with that earlier system.

However, approx 2.5 years ago after a lot more feedback and testing I did a complete redesign of the SharkVent Systems that eliminated any issues with Cam Cover connections completely. This redesign made the system much more effective and even reduced the load on the ProVent Separator. The side benefit was also that simplified the system dramatically and made for an even easier installation than it already was.

Hope that helps and sorry I didn't see this thread sooner!

Dave
Thanks Dave, not your fault I took a three year hiatis, from working or driving any of my sharks, I've had Zelda for 7 years and at least 5 years worth of parts (including the sharkvent) to be installed but I'm slowly catching up.
Old 05-02-2012, 05:28 PM
  #44  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shane
Thanks Dave, not your fault I took a three year hiatis, from working or driving any of my sharks, I've had Zelda for 7 years and at least 5 years worth of parts (including the sharkvent) to be installed but I'm slowly catching up.
Hi Shane,

I can relate about the 3 (or more) year hiatis, hopefully your's was voluntary!

It is great to know you are back at it again! Funny about 5 years worth of parts, sounds very familiar..Ha, Ha!!

Still hoping you can make it SITM, Jeannie, I and many others would love to see you make it out here someday!

All the best,

Dave
Old 05-02-2012, 05:33 PM
  #45  
BIMMERMIKE
Rennlist Member
 
BIMMERMIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 1,573
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Hi DR.,

Do you have any complete Sharkvent for sale now?
Thanks

Originally Posted by DR
Hi Shane,

I can relate about the 3 (or more) year hiatis, hopefully your's was voluntary!

It is great to know you are back at it again! Funny about 5 years worth of parts, sounds very familiar..Ha, Ha!!

Still hoping you can make it SITM, Jeannie, I and many others would love to see you make it out here someday!

All the best,

Dave


Quick Reply: '85-'86.5 Sharkvent Install Question?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:35 PM.