85-86 intake runner tubes
#46
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
look! Im talking about challenging claims of "feel" of idle speed changing, smoother idle, and less throttle pressure at given normal road speeds. Put it this way, if you get a higher idle speed with the rings, then if i put some large obstruction in the tubes, i should be able to get a lower idle speed, right. if i had an S3 intake, i would take something that could semi , very partially, block the runners and show that it would have no effec on idle speed. Ken has some great stuff. this "invention" will help at WOT, but how much is left to be determined.
Dont get upset with me for challenging something that has still not been given logical reasons for doing what it is claimed to do.
Dont get upset with me for challenging something that has still not been given logical reasons for doing what it is claimed to do.
#47
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting. I wonder how that would look on an ad for something you're selling?
And yet you call Ken a 'snake oil salesman'. You're a complicated guy Mark. But I'm afraid you've lost all the credibility you once had with me.
And for the record, Ken didn't say the rings added any HP. He even said they didn't affect the top of the arc at all. What is claimed (and noticed by those of us using them) is that driveability is improved. The idle is smoother and therefore can be lowered. The low end grunt is more noticeable. There is a very noticeable pull that used to happen higher in the RPM range that is lowered with the use of the torque rings.
.
And yet you call Ken a 'snake oil salesman'. You're a complicated guy Mark. But I'm afraid you've lost all the credibility you once had with me.
And for the record, Ken didn't say the rings added any HP. He even said they didn't affect the top of the arc at all. What is claimed (and noticed by those of us using them) is that driveability is improved. The idle is smoother and therefore can be lowered. The low end grunt is more noticeable. There is a very noticeable pull that used to happen higher in the RPM range that is lowered with the use of the torque rings.
.
Now, i suggested a little test on a stock intake. since the idle goes up with the rings, it seems logical that the idle should go down if you create even more "flow issues" at that junction point. stuff a corner of rag in there, and see if idle drops. it wont . why , because at idle the air molecules are very very few. remember we are operating at a pretty large vacumm at idle.
yes, i challenge things that dont make a lot of sence. even our government backs a theory that clean air fliters give you better gas mileage. couldnt be further from the truth. the arguments are the same i see here. but very few really understand how engines and air flow work!
sorry, ive lost your confidence. Again, separate how much we like Ken and all his great iventions, and look at this one at face value. all im asking for is some proof here and we have seen none. forget about the chips, which im sure do their job and are fantastic. Im only talking about the rings here.