Question for the top speed guys?
#1
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Take a stock 87 with a x pipe and tuning, with a 2.20 auto, which will have the fastest top speed, the same car with the 2.20 auto or with a G28/10 2.73?
#2
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Given they both have unlimited distance to achieve, and its the same car just with a swapped transmission, with the same humidity, density, etc. they should be able to achieve the exact same speed.
#3
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
now if you take the 2.73 auto from the factory and swap into the 2.20 then top speed would be different. but if the gearing were the same of the tranny seperate from the ring and pinion then the 2.2 would have the fastest top speed.
#4
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would not think they would be the same at all, even with the same rear end gear due to power losses in the automatic.
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From my experience with a 2.54 vs 2.20 auto, with stockish horsepower, the 2.54 will have a 3-5+ mph
higher top speed. When you get more power (say 450+rwhp), then the 2.20 can go faster (depending on
the hp to rpm curve). The main reason I go with a 2.20 is that 200 mph is at 5,700 rpm vs 6,500+ rpm
with 26" diameter tires, thus less chance of blowing up the motor from oil issues...
higher top speed. When you get more power (say 450+rwhp), then the 2.20 can go faster (depending on
the hp to rpm curve). The main reason I go with a 2.20 is that 200 mph is at 5,700 rpm vs 6,500+ rpm
with 26" diameter tires, thus less chance of blowing up the motor from oil issues...
Trending Topics
#8
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
since I do not have that much power, I wonder which would be faster.
rear end ratio has a lot to do with top speeds if you have enough power.
#9
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From my experience with a 2.54 vs 2.20 auto, with stockish horsepower, the 2.54 will have a 3-5+ mph
higher top speed. When you get more power (say 450+rwhp), then the 2.20 can go faster (depending on
the hp to rpm curve). The main reason I go with a 2.20 is that 200 mph is at 5,700 rpm vs 6,500+ rpm
with 26" diameter tires, thus less chance of blowing up the motor from oil issues...
higher top speed. When you get more power (say 450+rwhp), then the 2.20 can go faster (depending on
the hp to rpm curve). The main reason I go with a 2.20 is that 200 mph is at 5,700 rpm vs 6,500+ rpm
with 26" diameter tires, thus less chance of blowing up the motor from oil issues...
#10
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With forced induction, and 2.20 gears, and 1" taller tires than stock, I can vouch that it will travel much faster than the driver (me) is willing to go on public roads.
And you are right Greg, with this combination (before I added FI), it would take a looooong time to build speed when shifting into 1:1, felt like I would have needed 5 miles to get to top speed.
#11
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My late 90 S4 with Louie X pipe [no ST at that time] with its 2.54 gearing invariably ran out of steam before it could get to max power rpms. The taller gearing of the 2.2 box would simply fare worse. To make that work you need more than a stockish S4 is able to offer- hence why folks like George run the 2.2 because he has a sh*thouse full of power to drive it. So would Andy's new stroker motor.
The 2.75 is only available on manuals [correct?] so presumably there is a bit more available at the rear wheels as well. On top end, stock motor, I would say no contest. Thus why hot GT's can and do rev out in top gear- that and the hotter cams of course.
The stock S4 auto will struggle in 4th gear by comparison but in all fairness I have never been able to test this in 15C temps. When rwhp equals air resistance no more go- plain a simple. The S4 auto does high speed cruising very well but it takes a long distance to max out. I have long opined that a 2.75 final ratio would be far superior for warp drive missions. Thus 2.64 and worse, 2.2 will kill a stock S4 off- just loses the sporty feel and leaves it feeling way less than a "super car".
With a slight downhil incline and what I suspect was a bit of a tail wind I did once manage to see x87 kph on the clock but the ambient was still about 30C at the time so I would have been down about 5% or 15 bhp compared to standard [rated] conditions but that was exceptional.
Regards
Fred
The 2.75 is only available on manuals [correct?] so presumably there is a bit more available at the rear wheels as well. On top end, stock motor, I would say no contest. Thus why hot GT's can and do rev out in top gear- that and the hotter cams of course.
The stock S4 auto will struggle in 4th gear by comparison but in all fairness I have never been able to test this in 15C temps. When rwhp equals air resistance no more go- plain a simple. The S4 auto does high speed cruising very well but it takes a long distance to max out. I have long opined that a 2.75 final ratio would be far superior for warp drive missions. Thus 2.64 and worse, 2.2 will kill a stock S4 off- just loses the sporty feel and leaves it feeling way less than a "super car".
With a slight downhil incline and what I suspect was a bit of a tail wind I did once manage to see x87 kph on the clock but the ambient was still about 30C at the time so I would have been down about 5% or 15 bhp compared to standard [rated] conditions but that was exceptional.
Regards
Fred
#12
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With forced induction, and 2.20 gears, and 1" taller tires than stock, I can vouch that it will travel much faster than the driver (me) is willing to go on public roads.
And you are right Greg, with this combination (before I added FI), it would take a looooong time to build speed when shifting into 1:1, felt like I would have needed 5 miles to get to top speed.
And you are right Greg, with this combination (before I added FI), it would take a looooong time to build speed when shifting into 1:1, felt like I would have needed 5 miles to get to top speed.
I do have a local cop buddie who has offered to find out how fast mine will go for me, must be nice to have a get out of jail free card.
#13
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Our DOT has been building round-a-bouts like crazy the last couple of years. Recently a rather large one not far from my house. I asked one of my cop friends if he would like to do some skid pad testing with his car chasing me around it.
I'm pretty sure the look on his face was debating between using his gun or tazer on me.
#14
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Stock 87 5spd with 2:20 will red line in 4th gear no problem( I think its around 140 MPH). I don't know about 5th never had the ***** to try it. That would take a lot of open road and maybe slightly illegal. I have seen 160 MPH, which was pretty close to the limit for both car and driver, Car had more to give, but the driver had reached the fear of death and or Jail speed limiter.