Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Using a turbo wastegate in a supercharger application

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2011, 04:16 AM
  #46  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,706
Received 666 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z


A lot of people seem to confuse boost and torque, and assume that more boost automatically means more torque. That's definitely not the case.

More boost just means more measured pressure in the intake manifold. More torque means more pressure thown on the pistons, assuming the internals of the engine are the same.

I really don't care at all what the pressure in the intake manifold is.

Boost pressure is a parameter that can be easily measured and data logged to give the driver some idea of what is going on. The pressure in the inlet manifold is irrelevant if the air cannot flow into the combustion chamber but the pressure exists to force air in there -QED.

The dynomometer is mostly of significance with respect to before and after scenarios and acceleraton for any given gear ratio depends entirely on torque at the operating point [thereafter the ability of the tyres to hold it].

The only thiing that generally limits the TS as I am aware is the size of the intercooler that can be fitted. The way the auto box works on a stock S4 motor screams for more low end torque to wake it up. This presumably is why Porsche segregated the S4 and GT models to better mate cams to gear ratios.

Most die hards who fit the likes of Tim's kit invariably seem to be owners of manual transmission cars. Obviously some are autos but I do not know the percentage splits. It would be interesting to know whether the auto owners are as happy as the manual tranny owners are. Similarly a back to back comparison of the auto model with TS versus centrif s/c driven by an independent test driver.

Ultimately, no matter what is done, blowing [if done well] will produce a more exhillarating experience- of that I have no doubt.

Using a blow off valve I have quite a lot of reservations about in the sense of losing more than one gains.

At the end of the day the only thing that matters is the abiity to get the air into the combustion chamber. I think Ted's post says it all- the curve shift at the lower end resulting from different pulley ratio is just not worth much at all on a centrif s/c.

Regards

Fred
Old 11-03-2011, 10:57 AM
  #47  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
The pressure in the inlet manifold is irrelevant if the air cannot flow into the combustion chamber but the pressure exists to force air in there
BINGO!!

There is one major difference between every known positive displacement supercharged 928 (twin screw) and the centrifugal 928's: The Intake Manifold.

Yes, under pressure the intake manifold & runner length is still a factor.

Every centrifugal supercharged 928 retains the stock intake manifold. We've shown in other threads that a non-functioning flappy on a supercharged car will lose torque down low, just like a stock 928.

If a custom intake manifold were fitting with shorter runners with a centrifugal blower, the engine will lose low end torque, just like a normally aspirated 928.
Old 01-20-2012, 06:19 PM
  #48  
killav
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
killav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 1,534
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default .

Just recieved a Pro-Charger kit for my brother in law's 98 LS-1 Z-28. I am installing this for him over the next few weeks. After some initial break-in, he plans to add a wastegate to the charge pipe and performing the modifications discussed in this thread. This is a twin intercooled kit.

I will report back once complete but it might be a few months from now as he is over-seas in Afghanistan.....
Attached Images  
Old 01-20-2012, 08:26 PM
  #49  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Mike--

Why not put the wastegate in at initial compressor install time? It will sit closed until you up the pulley ratio.

From a process-control point of view, the easiest solution is to add a second throttle body at the inlet of the compressor. Control that throttle with a spring-backed diaphragm actuator, from pressure on the intake downstream of the pedal-operated throttle. ASSuming that you didn't starve the compressor inlet to the point of surging across the blades (this is a huge assumption), it would take care of the whole thing nicely.

Question-- do Murph-III owners have the abulity to get full throttle in third gear (auto box) now at less than 3000 RPM without tire spin?



Quick Reply: Using a turbo wastegate in a supercharger application



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:03 AM.