Todays quandry.....HP vs Torque race 928 comparo
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After reading a brief HP-torque battle on Carls Bonneville thread.....with Kibort on the "HP" side (also known as "kiborts") and Carl taking the "torque" side....whom I agree with....I thought I would ask a ??? using this video from my last race day with Rick and his race 928
The stats:
928 Estate (camera car)
2780lbs dry without driver
215whp (12.9lbs per whp)
256 torque (10.9lbs per torque)
automatic
Ricks 928 (yellow)
2570lbs dry without driver
222whp (11.6-1)
233 torque (11.0-1)
5 speed
Rick's car has a clear power-weight edge, but torque to weight is almost identical...both cars were dyno'd the day before on the same dyno...
The Evidence
At :45 you see the start of the drag race......I had to lift briefly at the start, then I moved left to complete the pass...................at 3:55 its the start of race 2....same result
How is this possible??.....can't say driver, since we both are "flat"![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
I ask professor kibort for an answer??
The stats:
928 Estate (camera car)
2780lbs dry without driver
215whp (12.9lbs per whp)
256 torque (10.9lbs per torque)
automatic
Ricks 928 (yellow)
2570lbs dry without driver
222whp (11.6-1)
233 torque (11.0-1)
5 speed
Rick's car has a clear power-weight edge, but torque to weight is almost identical...both cars were dyno'd the day before on the same dyno...
The Evidence
At :45 you see the start of the drag race......I had to lift briefly at the start, then I moved left to complete the pass...................at 3:55 its the start of race 2....same result
How is this possible??.....can't say driver, since we both are "flat"
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
I ask professor kibort for an answer??
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
#4
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Meh......rogerbox versus 5-speed has more to do with the outcome of that video than any other factor.
We have a pair of Corvette's on our team with identical power / weight (per NASA rules) but one has 100+more lb-ft of torque across the board (stock LS3 versus 6+ liter de-tuned for hp/weight rules).
Same tires (new A6's each day), same brakes etc.....
The cars are neck and neck at every track, every race with the LS3 car in the lead for overall wins.
If torque was the dominating factor you guys claim it to be, the LS3 car would be lapped. Especially at larger tracks like Road America.
Those of us who have driven both cars can say the higher torque car is definitely easier to drive, but dollars to donuts it's not actually faster. At least not in the dominating factor the torque junkies would like it to be.
If torque was the most important factor in road racing, it wouldn't have taken a rules change to make the diesels competitive in endurance racing.
The NASA scenario is the best proof behind this argument. Every car in each class is within the same HP / Weight rules yet the torque figures are all over the map. From low torque, high reving small engines to the 6+ liter in one of our cars. Yet lap times among equal drivers are within a small margin.
Someone go wake the Kibort........
We have a pair of Corvette's on our team with identical power / weight (per NASA rules) but one has 100+more lb-ft of torque across the board (stock LS3 versus 6+ liter de-tuned for hp/weight rules).
Same tires (new A6's each day), same brakes etc.....
The cars are neck and neck at every track, every race with the LS3 car in the lead for overall wins.
If torque was the dominating factor you guys claim it to be, the LS3 car would be lapped. Especially at larger tracks like Road America.
Those of us who have driven both cars can say the higher torque car is definitely easier to drive, but dollars to donuts it's not actually faster. At least not in the dominating factor the torque junkies would like it to be.
If torque was the most important factor in road racing, it wouldn't have taken a rules change to make the diesels competitive in endurance racing.
The NASA scenario is the best proof behind this argument. Every car in each class is within the same HP / Weight rules yet the torque figures are all over the map. From low torque, high reving small engines to the 6+ liter in one of our cars. Yet lap times among equal drivers are within a small margin.
Someone go wake the Kibort........
![popcorn](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
#5
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To that point...it depends on the track.
The torque car will win an autox type course, where you dont need the HP end of the stick to go FASTER, you just need to get to point A to B quicker, before you fall out of the torque curve.
The HP car will win on long tracks, where SPEED makes up for coming out of a corner a little less lively...ya..dudes is 2 cars ahead of you leaving a corner, but you have 15mph on him halfway down the straight.
The torque car will win an autox type course, where you dont need the HP end of the stick to go FASTER, you just need to get to point A to B quicker, before you fall out of the torque curve.
The HP car will win on long tracks, where SPEED makes up for coming out of a corner a little less lively...ya..dudes is 2 cars ahead of you leaving a corner, but you have 15mph on him halfway down the straight.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#7
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
forget the tq, two clear factors are gear-to-gear shift delay during the drag race (if heard correctly) and likely he never caught you during the race because you are smoother transitioned around the entire track with the auto.
curious, were the hp curves identical from the dyno pulls. simple comparo with shift points identified would let you calculate usable hp in the rpm/gear range...aren't these "kiborts"?
curious, were the hp curves identical from the dyno pulls. simple comparo with shift points identified would let you calculate usable hp in the rpm/gear range...aren't these "kiborts"?
Trending Topics
#8
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
TQ and HP are usually only talked about in term of peak numbers. So, you can have 2 cars with identical numbers, but the shapes of the curves can be vastly different, and one may have much higher over all average numbers also described as area under the curve. Frankly, I think the whole HP vs. TQ controversy is kinda dumb as both number are directly related to each other. One is calculated from the other. If one car has higher TQ in one part of the RPM range, its HP numbers have to be higher there too.
#9
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#10
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The less gears you have, the fatter you want your torque curve to be because when you shift even at redline, the RPMs will drop a lot more. If a car had only one gear, the car's acceleration would exactly follow the engine's torque curve (assuming the tires stayed hooked up all the time).
Dan
'91 928GT S/C
475hp/460lb.ft
Dan
'91 928GT S/C
![EEK!](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#11
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
These discussions always degenerate into silly arguements of variables and semantics. And yet, like a good car wreck, I just can't turn away and avoid enjoying the misery.
#12
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Cheers](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/beerchug.gif)
#13
Rennlist Member
#14
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#15
Rennlist Member