Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Is true dual exhaust overrated for perfomance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2011, 10:14 AM
  #1  
rgs944
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Is true dual exhaust overrated for perfomance

I have been doing a lot of reading on different car forums trying to decide on exhaust options. I know there are some good vendors here that sell kits but I do not want to spend $2500 on exhaust to update the entire factory exhaust. I am thinking of going to a single 3 in. mandrel bent exhaust coming off of a Y just after the cats. I will be using pre- bent 8 in. offset pipes from flowmaster to do the routing. My local shop will weld the pieces together after I get the correct layout. The car will remain mostly stock except for the exhaust. A big advantage in going with the single is weight and cost savings, but will it hurt performance? I have learned it should flow as well as 2.5 duels so I do not think it will. So here is the big question, will a single 3 in. exhaust have any negative effect on the x-pipe gains upstream? Below is a link to a flowmaster Y that I would use to go to the single 3 in. pipe after the cats. The Flowmaster guy told me that the scavenging effects of this Y have proven to be remarkable. Who knows but it sounded good. After the Y" I will be installing one flowmaster muffler in the original resonator location. Any thoughts?

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/sh...=&orig=Y250300
Old 03-01-2011, 10:19 AM
  #2  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,134
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Ott's Performance Engineering Single vs. Dual & Pipe Size
Old 03-01-2011, 10:42 AM
  #3  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 361 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Great link!
Old 03-01-2011, 11:50 AM
  #4  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I would never say that dual exhaust is overrated. There are single exhaust systems that yield the same gains as dual.

I can compare a car that does have a single 3" exhaust that makes over 370 HP and that is a 208 chassis CLK55 AMG. It has a 5.4L V8 and a single pipe exhaust that still makes more power than our newest 928, the GTS. Of course the piping is all mandrel bent, which would significantly help flow.

According to Louie Ott's research and judging by his dyno graphs, there is only a 7-10 HP difference between a single and dual setup all depending on pipe size with the 3.5" single pipe losing torque and a 3" pipe maintaining the factory curve but less HP than a dual 2.5" exhaust (only 10HP which could be picked up somewhere else like Roger's EIS intake.) Had I known about Louie's page sooner, I probably would have opted for a 2.5" to 3" merge collector and kept it single all the way back. I also keep getting burned by the passenger side muffler when checking the ATF. A 10 horsepower difference cannot be felt anyways in your butt dyno.

If you decide to go 3" single pipe, get rid of your factory's dual cats. Adding a Y-pipe afterwards will introduce too much scavenging and you will experience horsepower loss. Other than that, stick with an x-pipe and 2.5" dual pipes.

Below is also a chart that will give you a general idea of how pipe sizes relate to engine displacement and horsepower:


Last edited by Mongo; 03-01-2011 at 12:33 PM.
Old 03-01-2011, 12:22 PM
  #5  
Aspkiller
Rennlist Member
 
Aspkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Incline Village, NV & Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 511
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Why stop at 3 inch? A 4" Flowmaster 50 will fit, as will the 4" continuation pipe.
Old 03-01-2011, 12:22 PM
  #6  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

4" is way too big on a street 928 with a 5.0L unless it's supercharged. I would say 3.5" is better if a large pipe is needed.

The trick is to keep the exhaust gasses hot so that they are passed through the pipes faster. If the pipe is too big, the exhaust will cool becoming more dense and may result in loss of torque in low and mid-range. It's all about balance.
Old 03-01-2011, 12:33 PM
  #7  
Aspkiller
Rennlist Member
 
Aspkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Incline Village, NV & Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 511
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Good Point. My reference is my '82 Auto, where I put in an LS6 that is making about 420 flywheel hp. With the 3 speed auto, it is really a great street car. Just need to put some stickier tires on now.

Also, where's the chart you mentioned?
Old 03-01-2011, 12:41 PM
  #8  
rgs944
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

One big reason I would go with 3 in. is cost. I really like that new Flowmaster Y- pipe but I do not think they have it in 3.5 or 4. If I could find the pre-bent 3.5 in., (and a good Y in 3.5 in) I would look into going that route. There is just no one around here that does mandrel bending, so for best value for the buck I think I will need to stay with the 3 in. Flowmaster line.
Old 03-01-2011, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aspkiller
Also, where's the chart you mentioned?
If you can't see it, click this link. It is in my Rennlist album.

https://rennlist.com/forums/members/...eter-table.jpg
Old 03-01-2011, 12:51 PM
  #10  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,134
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rgs944
One big reason I would go with 3 in. is cost. I really like that new Flowmaster Y- pipe but I do not think they have it in 3.5 or 4. If I could find the pre-bent 3.5 in., (and a good Y in 3.5 in) I would look into going that route. There is just no one around here that does mandrel bending, so for best value for the buck I think I will need to stay with the 3 in. Flowmaster line.

Burns Stainless
and Stainless Works
Old 03-01-2011, 12:52 PM
  #11  
mickster
Race Car
 
mickster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo;8343054
According to Louie Ott's research and judging by his dyno graphs, there is only a 7-10 HP difference between a single and dual setup all depending on pipe size with the 3.5" single pipe losing torque...

snip

[img
https://rennlist.com/forums/members/mongo-albums-other-picture9152-exhaust-diameter-table.jpg[/img]
Seems the 3.5" Single pipe into a magnaflow muffler is the best solution--seems to have the most torque based on Ott's dyno chart.

I guess the backpressure helps.

Michael
Old 03-01-2011, 12:55 PM
  #12  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rgs944
One big reason I would go with 3 in. is cost. I really like that new Flowmaster Y- pipe but I do not think they have it in 3.5 or 4. If I could find the pre-bent 3.5 in., (and a good Y in 3.5 in) I would look into going that route. There is just no one around here that does mandrel bending, so for best value for the buck I think I will need to stay with the 3 in. Flowmaster line.
Your Flowmaster part is Y250350. This is for a 2.5" to 3.5" Y-pipe merge. Good luck on finding mandrel bent 3.5". It is not cheap. I do have a good source for mandrel bent 2.5" and 3" though.

What is your displacement though? If you are not running a stock S4 or GTS motor, you need at least 3.5".

Last edited by Mongo; 03-01-2011 at 01:40 PM.
Old 03-01-2011, 01:44 PM
  #13  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickster
Seems the 3.5" Single pipe into a magnaflow muffler is the best solution--seems to have the most torque based on Ott's dyno chart.

I guess the backpressure helps.

Michael
I remember a thread a while back where Louie said a 3.5" pipe would reduce the torque output though, but yield more HP on the top end. It's a trade off depending on where and how you drive your car.
Old 03-01-2011, 01:47 PM
  #14  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The typical V-8 hotrod sound is the result of having two seperate exhaust systems, one for each bank. The uneven firing order where two cylinders on one bank fire one after the other is part of the rythmic pattern our ears and brain seem to LIKE. So I would say Yes dual exhausts are over rated BECAUSE we like how they SOUND.....and two exhaust tips look better than a single
Old 03-01-2011, 01:59 PM
  #15  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Yup. I am getting tired of mine. I love the loudness, but I want that scream of a single pipe!


Quick Reply: Is true dual exhaust overrated for perfomance



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:25 PM.