Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Motor Mount Experiment - Picture Intensive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2010, 03:06 PM
  #1  
depami
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,828
Received 240 Likes on 129 Posts
Default Motor Mount Experiment - Picture Intensive

I recently installed new mounts only to learn that they could be defective.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-opinions.html

The engine height may have been acceptable but I feared they may be hollow and continue to sink so out they came. When I tapped on them they indeed did sound hollow. I could stick a wire way down into each of the four “vent” holes in both mounts. The next step was to measure the cavity.

Name:  Picture 013.jpg
Views: 376
Size:  48.9 KBName:  Picture 016.jpg
Views: 342
Size:  39.3 KB

I dropped them in a pail of water until no more bubbles came out. They held about 6 ounces of water each.

I then performed some “compression” tests.

Name:  Picture 005.jpg
Views: 352
Size:  68.8 KB

104 pounds (all I have) yielded 1/4" compression.

Name:  Picture 004.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  67.6 KB

Adding 50 or 60 pounds yielded 5/8” compression.

Name:  Picture 012.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  71.8 KB

I got some of this stuff. http://www.shopmaninc.com/moldmaking.html (No affiliation, just what I got).

Name:  Picture 017.jpg
Views: 361
Size:  40.2 KBName:  Picture 018.jpg
Views: 352
Size:  45.8 KB

It’s easiest to mix if you pour the thick into the thin. I mixed only enough for one at a time.

Name:  Picture 024.jpg
Views: 352
Size:  24.9 KB

It was too thick to go through the funnel so I had to pour it free hand. Glad I only mixed enough for one as it was barely flowing by the time the mount was full.

Name:  Picture 023.jpg
Views: 390
Size:  36.2 KB

Another test showed less than 1/4" compression.

Name:  Picture 012.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  71.8 KB

The pan was about 1/2" lower than the cross member. Now they are nearly even.

Name:  EH5.jpg
Views: 366
Size:  43.3 KBName:  Picture 035.jpg
Views: 349
Size:  52.7 KB

There was about 1/2" pan to cross member clearance. Now there is about 7/8”.

Name:  EH3.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  32.6 KBName:  Picture 039.jpg
Views: 348
Size:  46.9 KB

The hooks also show about a 3/8” gain.

Name:  EH7.jpg
Views: 379
Size:  58.2 KBName:  Picture 027.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  36.4 KB

Am I safe to run these?

Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Old 05-20-2010, 03:24 PM
  #2  
jeff spahn
Rennlist Member
 
jeff spahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 8,598
Received 389 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Wow, now I know my mounts are bad.
Old 05-20-2010, 03:25 PM
  #3  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

I suspect that the mounts need to provide a certain amount of flexibility if you want any more than just getting the engine up higher. Adding a relatively rigid/non-compressible filler to the mount may or may not give you the flexibility you desire. Even if it's there now, no clue on how the filler will break down over time with multiple flexes from normal vibration.

----------------

I'm a big fan of hydraulic mounts. I replaced mine with genuine P mounts before the Ford mounts were identified as possible replacements. Maybe next time I'll look at the aftermarket hydraulics, but the hollow rubber ones will likely not get used. The hydraulic mounts provde a certain amount ofmotion damping that a 'solid' rubber or hollow mount will never achieve. IMO, the excellent ride qualities and passenger comfort are compromised too much.
Old 05-20-2010, 04:00 PM
  #4  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Safe? You appropriately labelled this an experiment. Keep us posted.

You found a six ounce cavity that had an opening large enough to drip rubber through and put a funnel snout into it? Amazing. The ones I have from Roger have no such "vent" holes. Your initial load test is interesting in that the first 100 lbs yielded 1/4" but adding just another 60 lbs more than doubled that. Egad. Looks like your rubber fill added a lot of support, but, as dr. bob said, who knows how durable it is?
Old 05-20-2010, 04:15 PM
  #5  
Giovanni
Race Car
 
Giovanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,269
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I was a poor student in College and this was one my first DYIs on my Nissan Maxima. http://www.saabcentral.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=102450

Have you tested the polyurethane and see how soft it is? Depending on the softness it may work just fine.
Old 05-20-2010, 04:38 PM
  #6  
depami
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,828
Received 240 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
You found a six ounce cavity that had an opening large enough to drip rubber through and put a funnel snout into it? Amazing. The ones I have from Roger have no such "vent" holes.
I drilled a 3/8" hole for the funnel snout. Two of the vent holes are visible in the photo with the funnel. They are down around the edge.

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Your initial load test is interesting in that the first 100 lbs yielded 1/4" but adding just another 60 lbs more than doubled that.
That was a joke. Do you really think I only weigh 154 or 164 lbs?

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Looks like your rubber fill added a lot of support, but, as dr. bob said, who knows how durable it is?
The rubber I used is quite durable. I’ve playing with a 1.5” diameter X 3/16” thick piece since I poured them on 5-14-10. I have folded it onto itself a few thousand times and can see absolutely no sign of degradation or fatigue.
Old 05-20-2010, 04:41 PM
  #7  
depami
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,828
Received 240 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Giovanni
I was a poor student in College and this was one my first DYIs on my Nissan Maxima. http://www.saabcentral.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=102450

Have you tested the polyurethane and see how soft it is? Depending on the softness it may work just fine.

They have different durometer compounds available. I used Shore 60. It is about like a pencil eraser.
Old 05-20-2010, 05:27 PM
  #8  
depami
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,828
Received 240 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

I am not too concern with how the rubber will hold up, I think it will be fine. And, if everyone has been satisfied with the “feel” of the solid mounts (the good ones that is) I think I will be happy with the “feel” of these after being filled with this stuff.

The one concern I do have is if they will hold together. If you look at these two photos you should be able to see how these mounts are (supposed to be) held together. The hollow one in the photo is missing the “hook” (circled area) that holds it together.

Name:  Solid Mount 2.jpg
Views: 372
Size:  52.5 KBName:  Hollow Mount 2.jpg
Views: 334
Size:  66.5 KB

If this rubber is merely filler and isn’t “bonded” to the original rubber, the mounts could theoretically “pull apart”.
Old 05-21-2010, 12:16 PM
  #9  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

They will be fine.

And they will last no issues



Quick Reply: Motor Mount Experiment - Picture Intensive



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:32 PM.