Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Timing Belt service interval

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2010, 07:03 AM
  #1  
TheoJ
Racer
Thread Starter
 
TheoJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Venlo, Netherlands
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Timing Belt service interval

and there it was again... in another thread: 4-5 years of service: TB replacement !! (or if the mileage of 60k miles was reached)

Is there any document from Porsche that actually says so? I have a feeling that 5 yers is a good time to replace but never found any formal instruction about this. Anyone?

regards
Old 02-14-2010, 07:26 AM
  #2  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

How timely.

My 90 GT has done very few miles or kiometres since the last TB change 4.5 years ago. It's about ready for the tension check at 1500 miles ?!?

I have the TB I took off 4.5 years ago - it still looks like I could put it back on. Go figure
Old 02-14-2010, 08:18 AM
  #3  
jmrjames
Pro
 
jmrjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Snow Bird MA to FL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

This TB thing seems weird to me. I wonder if this is a design flaw or some sort of plot. Are there any other cars (Not Porsche) that requires this much attention to a Timing issue ?

Just a stupid question.
Old 02-14-2010, 11:04 AM
  #4  
WallyP

Rennlist Member
Rennlist Site Sponsor

 
WallyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

This was thrashed out pretty throughly several years ago on the Forum.

Consensus at that time seemed to be:
- There is no Porsche recommendation other than 60,000 mile replacement.
- Porsche expected us to drive the damn things, so 60,000 miles would be 5-10 years at most.
- The belt ages due to heat, oil and ozone, in addition to mileage wear.
- Given the cost of repairs if the belt fails on interference models, better safe than sorry. Five years or 50,000 miles seemed reasonable.

Still would seem reasonable, but I suspect that we over-do the caution. The chorus of cries to replace the belt on a very low-mileage GTS in the Middle East is an example. It might be safer to leave that belt on, rather than have a very inexperienced shop learn how to change a belt on your car...
Old 02-14-2010, 12:37 PM
  #5  
Gary Knox
Rennlist Member
 
Gary Knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 3,395
Received 462 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

On my first 928 - an '87 S4 with 50K on it when I bought it in 1999 had never had the belt changed. I was a "novice" with respect to 928's at the time, but had an Audi V8 with almost the same cam drive belt system. The factory spec on that car was to change the belt at 90K miles.
So - I drove the 928 for 2 years before I discovered 928 Owners Club, and learned of all the knowledge available from other & long time owners. I promptly had the belt changed AT 14 years and 80K miles. Of course it was a Porsche belt, not an aftermarket one. But - I now seem to change whenever I buy a car that is new to me, and at about 50K miles or 5 years. I DO think we are a bit paranoid, but as Wally says - a bad belt is a bad problem.

Gary Knox
Old 02-14-2010, 01:29 PM
  #6  
StratfordShark
Drifting
 
StratfordShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
Posts: 3,259
Received 88 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmrjames
This TB thing seems weird to me. I wonder if this is a design flaw or some sort of plot. Are there any other cars (Not Porsche) that requires this much attention to a Timing issue ?

Just a stupid question.
My nephew just wrote off engine in his Alfa 156 when TB failed. I think he had skipped the regular change interval...
Old 02-14-2010, 01:54 PM
  #7  
jmrjames
Pro
 
jmrjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Snow Bird MA to FL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Thank you for the information. I believe the nutshell answer saved me a lot of searching.

I have been used to chains and spokes that provided this function. It seems that this set up requires less attention.

Another dumb question, Are all years of the 928 interference models ?
Old 02-14-2010, 03:14 PM
  #8  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Its not just about the belt. Lots of other stuff in there that needs review. I'm figuring to disassemble and reinspect these 32V cars at least once in 18 months, ongoing.
Old 02-14-2010, 03:25 PM
  #9  
WallyP

Rennlist Member
Rennlist Site Sponsor

 
WallyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

"I have been used to chains and spokes that provided this function. It seems that this set up requires less attention."
I had a timing chain system failure on a Jag six-cylinder.

All 32-valve engines are definitely interference.

Early 16-valve engines are almost certainly non-interference.
Later 16-valve engines are usually non-interference, but have been shown to be interference in some cases.
Old 02-14-2010, 06:15 PM
  #10  
IrishLegend
Three Wheelin'
 
IrishLegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,267
Received 82 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I thought it was like this?

'78 - '84 = non-interference
'85 - '95 = interference

Is this wrong?
Old 02-14-2010, 06:17 PM
  #11  
Porscheaddiction
Advanced
 
Porscheaddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cornwall,Ontario Canada
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmrjames
This TB thing seems weird to me. I wonder if this is a design flaw or some sort of plot. Are there any other cars (Not Porsche) that requires this much attention to a Timing issue ?

Just a stupid question.
Check out some of the Ferrari forums and you will see Porsche is not the only ones with this sort of attention requirement on TB.
Old 02-14-2010, 06:18 PM
  #12  
WallyP

Rennlist Member
Rennlist Site Sponsor

 
WallyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

You can get a lot of loud arguments...

The way that I stated it is my best assessment of the question.

We have had posts where members stated flatly that they have had valve crashes on 16-valve engines.
Old 02-14-2010, 06:25 PM
  #13  
rluvsporsche
Instructor
 
rluvsporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Bay, California
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My experience with 110,000 mile I've only replaced the belt 2 times. I prefer to follow Porsche recommendation. IMHO, if 60K is good enough for Porsche then its good enough for me.
Old 02-14-2010, 06:38 PM
  #14  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 28,412
Received 2,545 Likes on 1,429 Posts
Default

not only does the belt get replaced, so does the tensioner roller, the pivot bushings and the pivot bolt, and the tensioner gasket and boot at a minimum
Old 02-14-2010, 06:48 PM
  #15  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rluvsporsche
IMHO, if 60K is good enough for Porsche then its good enough for me.
At current rate it takes me 48 years to get to 60k miles on automatic GTS. Should I use belt I changed last year until 2057?


Quick Reply: Timing Belt service interval



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:24 AM.