Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Porsche 928 GTS, CNBC's 12th most desirable Porsche

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2010 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
blitz928's Avatar
blitz928
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default Porsche 928 GTS, CNBC's 12th most desirable Porsche

CNBC's Most desirable Porsches ...The GTS made the list. Show a picture of a S4/GT though.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/34774345?slide=1

http://www.cnbc.com/id/34774345?slide=13
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:12 PM
  #2  
bronto's Avatar
bronto
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 52
From: Reno, NV
Default

Originally Posted by CNBC
Units Built: 2,887
Speed: 260 mph
These figures don't look right to me.
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:20 PM
  #3  
SeanR's Avatar
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Likes: 503
Default

Take a look at the picture of the 944
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:21 PM
  #4  
blitz928's Avatar
blitz928
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Take a look at the picture of the 944
NA
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:27 PM
  #5  
mickster's Avatar
mickster
Race Car
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 5
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

Originally Posted by bronto
These figures don't look right to me.
260 KPH is 161 MPH.

Someone at CNBC is not familiar with the metric system...and even that number is not right...falls below the 171 MPH that PCA claims.
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:37 PM
  #6  
pcar928fan's Avatar
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

161 is correct for S4/GT's from the Porsche Tech Spec book, but it is 171 for the GTS, so they got the wrong pic but the right data for that pic...
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:40 PM
  #7  
blitz928's Avatar
blitz928
Thread Starter
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
161 is correct for S4/GT's from the Porsche Tech Spec book, but it is 171 for the GTS, so they got the wrong pic but the right data for that pic...
Because only we can tell the difference between a S4 and a GTS.
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
hacker-pschorr
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 2,251
From: Up Nort
Default

I hate slide-shows.....

1. 356 #1
2. 356 Speedster
3. 550 Spyder (would be #1 in my book, at least for street cars)
4. 356 Carrera GT Coupe
5. 904 GTS
6. 911S (67-69)
7. 917 K/L/PA/10/30 (1969-1973)
8. 911 Carrera RS (1973-1974)
9. RSR/935 (1974-1979)
10. 944 Turbo 951 - too funny, picture of a N/A, probably an 83-85 too
11. 959 (after the 951??? Lart must work there)
12. 928GTS
13. Carrera 2 Cup Car (1992)
14. Boxster
15. Panamera......dear Lord, why? At least the Cayenne isn't on this list
Old 01-11-2010 | 07:45 PM
  #9  
jorj7's Avatar
jorj7
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 54
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
161 is correct for S4/GT's from the Porsche Tech Spec book, but it is 171 for the GTS, so they got the wrong pic but the right data for that pic...
Doesn't match my version of the Spec Book:

Old 01-11-2010 | 08:02 PM
  #10  
pcar928fan's Avatar
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Sorry George you are right it is 162! 1 mph...nice, thanks for pointing that out. In the Tech Spec book for the 87/88 S4 it lists the max speed at 1/2 DIN weights at 162. I stand corrected....well, actually I never stand, but SIT corrected...
Old 01-11-2010 | 08:44 PM
  #11  
jayc67's Avatar
jayc67
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield, TX
Default

I think I'd rather just go around quoting to my friends that CBNC says my car will do 260mph.

No sense in getting bogged down over facts or metric conversions.
Old 01-11-2010 | 09:07 PM
  #12  
pcar928fan's Avatar
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

^^^^^
You know that is one of the reasons why I left Leyland West Ins for my cars... They just COULD NOT GRASP that my '92 had an odometer that read in Km's instead of miles so when I would go over 2500 km's in a year they would nearly double the cost of my policy because they didn't understand that 2500 kms is NOT 2500 MILES...I would have to call and without fail I would get a great product of the CA school system that was to stupid to grasp the concept! Nice to see CNBC has hired that person away from LW! LOL!
Old 01-11-2010 | 09:12 PM
  #13  
Jadz928's Avatar
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 137
From: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Default

Where's the 993 Turbo?

How can the Panamera with few road miles, and a lack-of-customer satifaction rating make the list?

I could've made that list up with a Wiki or Google search.
Old 01-11-2010 | 09:13 PM
  #14  
jayc67's Avatar
jayc67
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield, TX
Default

ow can the Panamera with few road miles, and a lack-of-customer satifaction rating make the list?
Because Porsche has a fantastic marketing department that knew CNBC was putting out this list
Old 01-11-2010 | 09:20 PM
  #15  
pcar928fan's Avatar
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Yea, and where is the CGT?! Or the GT1-98? Or since they did include some race cars the 962?! That was the most effective and capable race car of all times!


Quick Reply: Porsche 928 GTS, CNBC's 12th most desirable Porsche



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:04 PM.