Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

90 GT engine rebuild pics at 213k miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2009, 07:39 AM
  #1  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default 90 GT engine rebuild pics at 213k miles

This got posted to our Landshark aussie 928 list, and I figured there's some people here who might find it interesting as a reference point in answer to the questions about "high mileage" 928's.

http://928.landsharkoz.com/Forums/ta...c/Default.aspx

The guys doing the rebuild are Buchanan Automotive - generally regarded as the best independent 928 workshop in Sydney, if not Australia.

Thanks to Bruce and Sean Buchanan for posting up the pics.
Old 10-01-2009, 08:11 AM
  #2  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

looks like a good write-up
Old 10-01-2009, 10:03 AM
  #3  
S4ordie
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Rennlist Member
 
S4ordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 8,856
Received 335 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

Wow! That is some amazing wear (very little) for that many km/mi. So in the end it sounds like all the did was clean everything (except the intake runners....?) and reassembled with new rod bearings, valve seals and waterpump. I assume all the small ancillary bits as well. That is amazing.
Old 10-01-2009, 12:27 PM
  #4  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

When I did the valve cover gaskets on mine at 216k miles I didn't see a single pit on any of my cams either. So I just gotta get off my butt and do the BG intake treatment to get the carbon off the pistons and be good to go for another 200k miles

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460.lb.ft
Old 10-01-2009, 12:42 PM
  #5  
killav
Rennlist Member
 
killav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 1,534
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

This goes back to the old addage, you get what you pay for. In our case, these were high end GT cars and the Engineering that went into not only the Engine but all aspects of the car is clearly evident. Are their areas that are just horrible (HVAC and Electrical systems come to mind) then yes. But you can't deny that these engines were built to last and the cars to be driven.
Old 10-01-2009, 01:46 PM
  #6  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

It's not really surprising. The engine is rated at 316HP. It's lifetime duty cycle has been about 10-15%. Not exactly stressing the metals or wear items. Properly lubricated, and maintained at a decent temp this is the wear I would expect.
Old 10-01-2009, 02:23 PM
  #7  
namasgt
Three Wheelin'
 
namasgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,675
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the cylinder walls look good.
Old 10-01-2009, 05:42 PM
  #8  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
It's not really surprising. The engine is rated at 316HP. It's lifetime duty cycle has been about 10-15%. Not exactly stressing the metals or wear items. Properly lubricated, and maintained at a decent temp this is the wear I would expect.
That is a very good point. My wife's acura is 3.2L. Its rated at 260hp. So almost as much power, but way less cubic inches to do it. And at 93,000, its using oil. Not leaking it. Sealed up great. Its BURNING the oil. Because the ring gaps are getting big, or the valve guides are a bit more open. Its not going through the intake. I checked that.
Old 10-01-2009, 07:12 PM
  #9  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
That is a very good point. My wife's acura is 3.2L. Its rated at 260hp. So almost as much power, but way less cubic inches to do it. And at 93,000, its using oil. Not leaking it. Sealed up great. Its BURNING the oil. Because the ring gaps are getting big, or the valve guides are a bit more open. Its not going through the intake. I checked that.
I don't know a thing about Acura engines but excess oil consumption is always associated with improper break-in, or a design flaw. Most often is improper break-in. (run it hard, get it hot early in the life of the engine).
Old 10-04-2009, 09:41 PM
  #10  
cold_beer839
Rennlist Member
 
cold_beer839's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lillington, NC
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What oil did you use and what climate temperatures did you experience?



Quick Reply: 90 GT engine rebuild pics at 213k miles



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:51 PM.