Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

X pipe install made easier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2010, 09:21 AM
  #31  
Don Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Don Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cypress (Houston), TX
Posts: 2,632
Received 113 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

That could be my problem. I think my mid support gave out about a decade ago...
Old 12-02-2010, 04:26 PM
  #32  
Jerome Craig
Rennlist Member
 
Jerome Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I used two wraps of this to seal the slots on the rear tailpipes and put the fiberglass wrap over it as per the instructions. I made sure that the bandage butted up against the cats so there would not be any opening between the cat and the tailpipe. I did not, however, have any of the bandage covering the area where the cats and tailpipes joined.
Name:  Muffler&Tailpipe Bandage.jpg
Views: 267
Size:  57.4 KB
After a month of daily use, I do not seem to have any leaks. BTW: I'm running the x-pipe with GT resonators and GT muffler. There is a bit of a drone between 1500 - 1700 rpm; but the jump in hp and tq is noticeable and the sound as the engine revs toward redline is amazing!

Jerome
Old 12-02-2010, 04:33 PM
  #33  
Tom in Austin
Rennlist Member
 
Tom in Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas!
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Dumb question ... why does the maker of the X-pipe have an end which is larger than the pipe it connects to?
Old 12-02-2010, 07:34 PM
  #34  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,282
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom in Austin
Dumb question ... why does the maker of the X-pipe have an end which is larger than the pipe it connects to?
Actually a good question.

I have two X-pipes, one of the Motorsport SLC ones, and a stainless one from the UK by Ritech Systems (might be spelled wrong).

The UK one bolts up much easier - slip-fit and clamp to the rear pipes, same as the stock cats, and it has an O2 bung at the merge, which I prefer to on each bank.

The UK one does look a little skinny at the merge of the X - I suspect the larger diameter pipes on the Motorsport X were chosen for the optimal cross-sectional area at the merge. I haven't compared them on the dyno on the same car - I should do, just haven't had the chance.

Stan - your point about the mid support is a good one. My '89 was missing it (presumed gone when a rebuilt TT was fitted under a PO's stewardship), and I recently put a replacement one on when doing my TT. I'll order the Heat Sheath and hopefully fix it.
Old 12-02-2010, 07:50 PM
  #35  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,498
Received 2,709 Likes on 1,312 Posts
Default

Note the important part of this is that you want the rear duel pipe support fiitted to the pipes ,
if its not fitted then the pipes after the X will move and cause the joint to fail.
The middle support ties the exhaust in with the TT and engine.
Stan - your point about the mid support is a good one. My '89 was missing it
Are you guys talking about #'s 6-11 in this diagram? Neither of my cars (despite stock exhausts) had/have this support, I always assumed this was some sort of vestigial appendix-type thing in PET. Where does that #9 bracket attach? To the TT, or the heat shield bracket, or ????

Old 12-02-2010, 09:05 PM
  #36  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,282
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Are you guys talking about #'s 6-11 in this diagram? Neither of my cars (despite stock exhausts) had/have this support, I always assumed this was some sort of vestigial appendix-type thing in PET. Where does that #9 bracket attach? To the TT, or the heat shield bracket, or ????

7 - the giant hose clamp, holds 6 against the TT.

A rubber exhaust hanger then joins 6 and 9.

The bolt (11) then clamps the pipes between 10 and 9 holding them fixed in position.

The whole lot fits through that neat square hole in the heat shield.

I'll go take a pic in a minute if I can figure out where I left my garage camera, although the heat shield hides a lot of it.
Old 12-02-2010, 09:13 PM
  #37  
Ispeed
Drifting
 
Ispeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: an unnatural suburban habitat
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Are you guys talking about #'s 6-11 in this diagram? Neither of my cars (despite stock exhausts) had/have this support, I always assumed this was some sort of vestigial appendix-type thing in PET. Where does that #9 bracket attach? To the TT, or the heat shield bracket, or ????

I believe that center support to the TT was deleted when they went to the smaller resonators (mid '88). I have one on my '87 and it is in a great location to support things. I wouldn't go without it.

#7 is a clamp around the TT. You need 6, 7, 8a, 9, 10 and 11.
Old 12-03-2010, 07:24 AM
  #38  
Tom in Austin
Rennlist Member
 
Tom in Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas!
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

PET shows the center mounting for GTS as well ... I posted about this and seems most people's cars don't have one. I had Sean put one on my '94 last time he was going over things and now the amount of movement in the exhaust system is noticeably less.

Still wonder if these get overlooked when people replace their TT. Would be easy to overlook putting #7 onto the new tube and once you finished that job who would go back and take care of it?
Old 12-03-2010, 08:34 AM
  #39  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I've seen so many 88+ cars without these that I reckon either PET is wrong or the factory just forgot to fit them. It would be interesting to see how many Porsche AG have in stock - if it's in the 10s of 1000s it would prove my theory.

For those that want to fabricate their own the clamp for the pipes is an exact replica of the clamps that are used to to join sections of temporary construction site fencing together ( the kind of fence that is a panel of mesh about 6' long and about 5' high, surrounded by a 2" tube with a downstand leg at one end that sits in a concrete "shoe" with a 2" hole in it." And I never told you to "borrow" one. They also use this type of fence at open air rock concerts.
Old 12-03-2010, 01:44 PM
  #40  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The reason the crossover designer made them with a 2.5" tube is to allow fittment to the now released 2.5" cat back system. I saw no reason to create horsepower then neck it down when it would need to be reworked at a later date for those that want even more power. (always looking ahead!) The intent the whole time was to create a full high flow exhaust system, not just a single piece. There are so many options available to connect it to the factory cat back that it is up to the customer as to how they want to do it. The fiberglass tape I send with them has worked for me for years when done properly.

I am sure that there are easier and better ways according to each customer to connect them in each situation but as you are seeing, every situation is different. Missing the center support allows more flex and can work the fiberglass out. I can't send center supports along with each crossover "just in case". Quite a few of our customers actually weld them onto the catback...done deal. If the aluminized tape works for you...use it. If you want to use tubing reducers, feel free! It's entirely up to you as to your preferred method of attachment. If someone comes up with a failsafe connection that is cost effective and works for everyone I would be more than happy to use it.

Some of our customers have had 3-bolt flanges welded to the end of the crossover and the front of the cat back. That would be the preferred method but would preclude installing one at home for most people. If you really wanted a nice setup, a V-band clamp with flanges would be sweet but would also have to be welded on.
Old 12-03-2010, 02:34 PM
  #41  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ispeed
I believe that center support to the TT was deleted when they went to the smaller resonators (mid '88). I have one on my '87 and it is in a great location to support things. I wouldn't go without it.

#7 is a clamp around the TT. You need 6, 7, 8a, 9, 10 and 11.
I think you could be right about the deletion of this support in 89. My 89, which I know was never messed with, has none of these center support parts.

I installed the SLC x-pipe (from Roger) over a year ago. Very soon after that, I swapped in an 87-88 (large resonator) exhaust cat-back (with my existing RMB) to manage the noise, which was way too loud with the small 89 resonators. The 87-88 large resonators really helped tame the exhaust note - still mean sounding when jumped on but not offensively loud and much more tolerable when cruising. I still don't have the center support. Despite that and only using the fiberglass packing Roger provided, the exhaust has no noticeable leaks. I do have the clamps TIGHT as Stan recommends. Although I did it with hand tools, the band is nicely deformed around the joint and hasn't lost the packing in the year or so it's been on.
Old 12-03-2010, 02:43 PM
  #42  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,498
Received 2,709 Likes on 1,312 Posts
Default

The center support parts are still available from Porsche for about $50. I'm pretty certain the exhaust on my GT was never touched before I got it, and there was no sign of these clamps it.

I also had good luck with the fiberglass wrap and tightening the hell out of the clamps so they deformed around the connections:

Old 12-03-2010, 08:01 PM
  #43  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I don't think anyone was messing with the TT in my GT before I rebuilt it. I did not have any center exhaust supports on the TT.

I also have a problem sealing my cats to the catback. The problem is I may have tightened the band clamp bolts too much. As you can see from Rob's picture above, his clamp edges are already tucking themselves under the metal divider on the cat side. This is what happened to mine except worse.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 12-03-2010, 08:20 PM
  #44  
fraggle
Rennlist Member
 
fraggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bristow, VA
Posts: 3,402
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

My '87, #1608, doesn't have the center clamp hardware, but it make have been removed before I got it. However, considering the condition I've found things I have my doubts.
Old 12-03-2010, 09:13 PM
  #45  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,453
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,054 Posts
Default

Here's my secret to a no muss no fuss x-pipe install:

http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/30732/10002/-1


Quick Reply: X pipe install made easier



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:10 AM.