Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Fuel pump controller from a light dimmer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2009, 03:38 PM
  #1  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Fuel pump controller from a light dimmer

Here are a couple of cell phone photos of my attempt to produce a fuel pump control signal using the MAF signal.

First, background. I will be using the new generation Fuelab Prodigy fuel pump. That pump can pump out 170+ gallons per hour, which would exhaust the fuel return line in almost all circumstances. The good news is that the Prodigy pump accepts a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) signal that allows controlling the flow rate.

Since the air fuel mass ratio is about constant, and certainly within the range from 10 to 18, a natural signal source for the pump is the MAF signal. It would be nice to have the pump run hard only when the engine is ingesting air at a rapid rate. The 928 MAF signal is nominally 0-5V output which in practice fluctuates in the range 1.5V-5.5V most of time. The practical problem remains converting the 0-5V analog signal to PWM signal and include a couple of trims and adjustments in the conversion.

So here's what I did. I bought a light dimmer kit from Velleman. Kit number is K8004. It doesn't have a Porsche logo on it, so it was $20 + $8 for shipping. I also ordered an aluminum box from the web for about $10 + shipping, and then a couple of bags of waterproof connectors. I had grommets and wire already. So, we're looking about a $50 budget here.

The end result is an adjustable analog to PWM converter packaged in a way that is at least splash proof. Photos below.

Here's the starting point. The kit is quick to put together, instructions are very clear, and soldering is made easy by the layout.

Name:  FuelabAssembly 008.jpg
Views: 1161
Size:  49.7 KB

Next, it was time to test the complete converter. The RadioShack multimeter has PWM duty cycle logic in it, which makes this testing very simple. I followed the test plan that came with the kit and added a couple of my own. The kit worked without any adjustments or fixes.

Name:  IMG_2572.jpg
Views: 1573
Size:  76.8 KB

The box is a little bit of an overkill, it's a sealed waterproof electronics box. I drilled two holes and pushed modified Jegs grommets into the holes. Next, I pushed the shrink wrap and wire thru the grommet.

Notice the three pots in converter. These control PWM sensitivity, frequency, and offset. Offset is the minimum duty cycle that will be coming out the converter even if there's no input signal (or it's grounded). I set the frequency to about 1 kHz. The sensitivity now gets up to about 90% duty cycle when the input signal is about 5V.

Name:  IMG00025.jpg
Views: 2214
Size:  89.5 KB

Wiring is very easy, because the kit has short-circuit protection and overload protection. Since we are only moving data here and not actually powering the pump, thin wires will work just fine.

I terminated the wires to three waterproof (or at least my source in Hong Kong claims these are waterproof) female connectors. Both the MAF in and PWM out include a signal ground wire. I had to come up with my own color coding standard which is universally applied in my household today.

Red: DC in positive
Black: DC ground
White: Signal positive
Blue or green: Signal ground

Name:  IMG00023.jpg
Views: 973
Size:  76.2 KB


Here's the finished converter, my nearly empty wallet next to it give scale:

Name:  IMG00026 (1).jpg
Views: 1039
Size:  83.3 KB


Over the next couple of weeks, we'll see if this works in the car. I think it will. Alternatively, the Porsche may turn in to a literal "bondfire of vanities."
Old 07-11-2009, 05:36 PM
  #2  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Might work. Be sure the input to the light dimmer doesn't load the output of the MAF and change the MAF voltage to the LH/EZ-K. MAF output at idle is around 2.8 volts, 3 volts with cold engine.
Old 07-11-2009, 05:54 PM
  #3  
BBX
Rennlist Member
 
BBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm so hungry I thought that box in the second to last picture had Oreo's in it...
Old 07-11-2009, 06:54 PM
  #4  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Louie928
Might work. Be sure the input to the light dimmer doesn't load the output of the MAF and change the MAF voltage to the LH/EZ-K. MAF output at idle is around 2.8 volts, 3 volts with cold engine.
It doesn't draw any measurable amount of current. About the same as an opamp signal in.
Old 07-11-2009, 08:23 PM
  #5  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I remember looking over that pump and thinking about trying some kind electronic fuel pressure regulation, but ended up deciding against any side projects. Some kind of fixed return line restriction, a pressure sensor, and the fuel pressure could be electronically set.

BTW maybe an interesting source for a signal would be the injector pulse, plenty of current, and directly related to fuel consumption.
Old 07-11-2009, 08:33 PM
  #6  
entropy_engineering
Racer
 
entropy_engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Can the mosfets in the controller put out enough current for the pump long term?
Old 07-11-2009, 08:58 PM
  #7  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by entropy_engineering
Can the mosfets in the controller put out enough current for the pump long term?
Probably not if used the way you are thinking. The power transistors and the whole converter is sized to deliver about 5A continuously. So if I were to actually power my pump that draws up to 30A with this thing, the transistors would burn if the wires wouldn't melt first.

However, recall what I am using this for and how.

I have a pump with an internal controller that uses a PWM signal as a control input. The Ruth Goldberg machine I whipped up is simply translating an analog data signal into a PWM data signal, not to a PWM power source. The actual power circuitry is inside the fuel pump and this effort has nothing to do with it. The pump's internal controller that receives the PWM signal draws virtually no current from the PWM signal line. When installed, the whole converter that you see in the pictures could operate a month with 8 AA batteries.
Old 07-11-2009, 09:50 PM
  #8  
Kevin Michael
Rocket Pilot
Rennlist Member
 
Kevin Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: gettysburg pa.
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bell engineering and others already sell devices like this. Cool though if you can manufacture your own. I wish I knew more about that stuff. Good job.
Old 07-11-2009, 11:42 PM
  #9  
WallyP

Rennlist Member
Rennlist Site Sponsor

 
WallyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 6,469
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

160 mph @ 4mpg = 40 gallons per hour. Do we really need 170+ gallons per hour?
Old 07-12-2009, 01:28 AM
  #10  
entropy_engineering
Racer
 
entropy_engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ah, I missed that. Makes sense now thx.
Old 07-12-2009, 04:16 AM
  #11  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

The answer is a resounding "NO!" ;-) Need has nothing to do with this.

Originally Posted by WallyP
160 mph @ 4mpg = 40 gallons per hour. Do we really need 170+ gallons per hour?
Old 07-12-2009, 06:34 AM
  #12  
Larry928GTS
Registered User
 
Larry928GTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by WallyP
Do we really need 170+ gallons per hour?
Only if you're making somewhere around 2,100hp.
Old 07-12-2009, 08:30 AM
  #13  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I willl be running 2 Bosch 044s in my car, Though I will be having them on seperate switches. And only needed if I really crank up the power.
Old 07-12-2009, 12:08 PM
  #14  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

You should consider two options then.

First option, run the second pump based on a Hobbs switch so that it only comes on when boost is over certain threshold. This kit can be adapted pretty easily for a second fuel pump. http://www.racetronix.biz/customkiti...sp?kc=CEPH&eq=

Second option, get a real PWM power controller so you can run the second or both pumps based on something like the MAF signal.


Originally Posted by Lizard931
I willl be running 2 Bosch 044s in my car, Though I will be having them on seperate switches. And only needed if I really crank up the power.
Old 07-12-2009, 12:52 PM
  #15  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Tuomo,

I may consider running a boost switch to override the switches and turn on the second pump. However I plan on being able to manually activate it, along with the higher boost setting which will need the fuel.
I will not be running a stock EFI system, nor will I have any stock wiring in the car. This car will have the absolute minimum on it.


Quick Reply: Fuel pump controller from a light dimmer



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:03 AM.