Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Thinking about 104mm bores

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2009, 11:40 PM
  #16  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have overbored over 50 blocks for 104mm bores and have never seen a block as thick as Sterlings 104mm overbore being thicker post boring than a stock S4 was preboring!!! With Porsche min/max tols per Reynolds it had to have been a block that was a defect (core shift) and got through QC.

Maybe Bud can comment with his experience boring and honing blocks for 104mm pistons?
Old 06-22-2009, 01:33 AM
  #17  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I have the parts for two engines, one is the full house effort with a billet crank the other was designed to be much cheaper and has a capacity of 327 CI or almost 5.4 litres. I have built a custom manifold for this engine, it has high flow heads, around 265 to 270 cfm at 0.500 lift which is what the cams go to. The pistons are custom and designed for the alusil block material with manufacturer's recommended clearances and rings. They are light also and you should use the S crank and have the offset that the factory pistons have. Comp will be around low 11s. Power should be in the 400 to 450 range, get lucky maybe a touch more.

Greg
Old 06-22-2009, 03:48 AM
  #18  
terry gt
Burning Brakes
 
terry gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

what is the minimum aceptable wall thickness for a 104.5 bore ? I have a 86 block that is already bored . At the top of the bore the cyl . measure min .230 inches to max .265 inches . is this ok?
Old 06-22-2009, 04:03 AM
  #19  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Some wall thickness info in these old threads.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...hift-data.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...r-stroker.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-strokers.html
Old 06-22-2009, 08:57 AM
  #20  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

If you go Nikasil make sure you get the correct rings for Nikasil. Rings for stock Alusil will start chunking the Nikasil in 17K to 20K miles. Just ask just about any 911 racer shop. I learned this the hard way from a car I bought that I thought the Nikasil the previous owner had done was a good thing.
Old 06-22-2009, 10:39 AM
  #21  
RicerSchnitzzle
Three Wheelin'
 
RicerSchnitzzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Banished to the SBC Wastelands
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RicerSchnitzzle
I checked the cylinder thickness at the top of 2 spare 85 blocks I have. Both were just under 4mm. Increasing bore 4mm would take away 2mm, leaving a little less than 2mm. Half the original thickness. Is this really safe long term?
Okay, I'm pretty stupid... Read the wrong side of the caliper. Need to replace the battery so I don't have to figure it out.

It was just shy of .4" Looked again and my bore ranges from 8.5 to 9mm measured at the top.

What's the easiest way to check bore spacing as this might be a decent block for boring. I still think I'm staying with a 6.0L and stock pistons, but who knows, I might find an extra $2K sitting around for block work.
Old 06-22-2009, 11:40 AM
  #22  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RicerSchnitzzle
It was just shy of .4" Looked again and my bore ranges from 8.5 to 9mm measured at the top.
That sounds much better.

I still think I'm staying with a 6.0L and stock pistons, but who knows, I might find an extra $2K sitting around for block work.
If you have two blocks which have 8.5mm+ walls I might be able to help make decision easier by buying one. Using any 100mm stock pistons together with stroker crank is problematic as there isn't room for full piston skirt in block when stroke is longer than stock.
Old 06-22-2009, 01:13 PM
  #23  
9x8
Racer
 
9x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Evil Empire.
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Using any 100mm stock pistons together with stroker crank is problematic as there isn't room for full piston skirt in block when stroke is longer than stock.
6.0 with stock pistons won't work indeed, but it might be possible to go with 944 ones from what I heard.
Old 06-22-2009, 02:11 PM
  #24  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Erkka,

Both of my 86 blocks have 8mm cylinders. From what I have been told the S4s are 7mm.

One is being used, the other does ned a rebore but is otherwise good........
Old 06-22-2009, 04:33 PM
  #25  
kccampro
Pro
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yet another post that's beyond my knowledge... I have two Euro S motors (M28/11 & M28/12) and a complete S4 motor. Which option in this thread is the cheapest if you want to replace the pistons as part of a rebuild? I just want a stong running motor for the DE project that I can beat on a few times a year, for many years, without spending stroker money. Are 944 pistons cheaper? I'm lost... back to searching the threads...
Old 06-22-2009, 04:50 PM
  #26  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iccy928
Yet another post that's beyond my knowledge... I have two Euro S motors (M28/11 & M28/12) and a complete S4 motor. Which option in this thread is the cheapest if you want to replace the pistons as part of a rebuild? I just want a stong running motor for the DE project that I can beat on a few times a year, for many years, without spending stroker money. Are 944 pistons cheaper? I'm lost... back to searching the threads...
Sell the S4, buy a MUCH cheaper 85/86 short block, and build a straight up normal Euro hybrid (Euro top, US bottom) its a solid known performer and should be plenty for DE.

What year is your chassis? Anything CIS would make an easy drop in.
Old 06-22-2009, 05:35 PM
  #27  
kccampro
Pro
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 4 motors at the moment... two Euro S 4.7L (M28/11 and M28/12), a running S4 motor and a running US '83 4.7L

I need to decide what my best option is and then freshen up that engine. The chassis is a '80 Euro with a full chrome molly cage, coil overs, LSD and S4 brakes. I need to figure out which engine to use and just go with it... otherwise this thing will never make it to the track. Definately using the CIS set-up. Also, want to send the Euro S heads to 928 Motorsports for the porting and polishing since what I have in mind is just a good breathing, good compression strong running NA motor.

Bill


Originally Posted by danglerb
Sell the S4, buy a MUCH cheaper 85/86 short block, and build a straight up normal Euro hybrid (Euro top, US bottom) its a solid known performer and should be plenty for DE.

What year is your chassis? Anything CIS would make an easy drop in.

Last edited by kccampro; 06-22-2009 at 05:57 PM.
Old 06-22-2009, 08:13 PM
  #28  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

80 Euro is CIS, and so are both of the Euro S motors you have. Either one, pick the best etc. should drop right in and provide plenty of go power in a track car.

The S4 and US 83 would be a wiring nightmare to put in your car, neither have spare parts that would useful either, so I would sell them to somebody that can use them.

I don't think porting and polishing a stock Euro S head has any real benefit, the cam is the limiting factor on the breathing combined with the intake system.

If I took the heads off of a Euro S motor for any reason, they would not be going back on anything but a US 85/86 shortblock. Too much bang for the buck to ignore, at least a 10% increase in HP and torque.

For a track car, and if my state wasn't smog bonkers, I might get a set of long tube headers, but at the minimum 85/86 exhaust manifolds and a Y or X merge pipe.
Old 06-22-2009, 09:19 PM
  #29  
kccampro
Pro
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
If I took the heads off of a Euro S motor for any reason, they would not be going back on anything but a US 85/86 shortblock. Too much bang for the buck to ignore, at least a 10% increase in HP and torque.

For a track car, and if my state wasn't smog bonkers, I might get a set of long tube headers, but at the minimum 85/86 exhaust manifolds and a Y or X merge pipe.
Ok... now we're gtting somewhere. I think I'm starting to understand. I thought a 'hybrid' meant 16v heads on a 5.0L block, but it sounds like not all 5.0L blocks are the same. What's unique about the '85/'86 block that makes more power than my '88 S4 block? Thanks for the info danglerb.
Old 06-22-2009, 09:28 PM
  #30  
terry gt
Burning Brakes
 
terry gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Danglerb , thanks for the links , has anyone tryed reinforcing the cyl walls using devcon 3874 ? Filling the water jacket with sugar or salt ( it disolves) and filling the top 1/2 inch with epoxy , then drilling it for water pasages ? to create a reinforcing ring ?


Quick Reply: Thinking about 104mm bores



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:21 AM.