Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

How to recognize perfect block for stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2005, 01:52 PM
  #1  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Question How to recognize perfect block for stroker?

There is some talk in archives about cylinder wall thickness. So far I have measured three different 100mm bore blocks ('88 & '89 S4 and '92 GTS) and none of them has more than 7mm thick walls on thinnest area. Seems cylinder tower outside diameter is about 115mm on all of them meaning there really cant be much more than 7mm. My home made measuring device isn't very accurate but it should be able to tell difference between 7mm and 10mm thick walls. Taking 2mm away from 7mm do not leave much room and is probably too little to work even in NA application using 968 pistons.

Is '85-86 32V block only safe option for stroker then? How much is cylinder outside diameter in them? Did early ROW S4 also use these blocks? Tried to search archives for '87 model year S4 engine number cut of before which it would be safe to assume block is this older thick walled version. How can it be recognized without removing heads? I have '83 S block where there is two mounting point in top V that are not present in '92 GTS.





'83 S with two mounting points on top center of V





'92 GTS without those and several other changes as well.





Did '85-86 32V have these same mounting points or is it somehow different also?

Awfully many questions but how to know just by looking complete engine if early S4 block has thick walls or not is most important one. Hope someone can give easy answer to it.
Old 06-22-2005, 02:08 PM
  #2  
Dave Howerdel
Three Wheelin'
 
Dave Howerdel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can tell you that my US85 has the holes.
Need them for the throttle body.
Old 06-22-2005, 02:59 PM
  #3  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Reynolds has a minimum tolerance of .250" (6.35mm) for wall thickness. I think there are some strokers out there running .220"(5.59mm) thickness without issues. The one I'm building has two thin walls right around the 5mm mark. Now the thin walls are on two separate cylinders, and are only at one of the compass points, with the remaining cylinder wall being in the .220" range or greater. I'm going to run it, we'll see if she holds together.

A local owner rebuilt his 85 and it had some mighty thick cylinder walls. I'd say the '85/'86 blocks would be great candidates, you'lljust have to mill out the mounts in the "V".

Was that a typo where you wrote that you have an "'83 S block"? Did you mean to say '85? I didn't think the 4.7L motors had enough wall thickness to be bored to 104mm. You would be working with the 16v heads also, which may not be optimum with the larger displacement.
Old 06-22-2005, 03:17 PM
  #4  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I wasn't able to measure more than just the top faces of my spare '85 block's cylinder walls, but they range between 8mm and 7mm. The inner two cylinders on either side have thinner walls (ie 7mm at their thinnest point). Again I know this is very rough, I don't have a caliper handy.
Old 06-22-2005, 03:23 PM
  #5  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Howerdel
I can tell you that my US85 has the holes.
Need them for the throttle body.
And they are exact same as in pictures? What I'm looking for is information what to look for when block could be one of those earlier 32V motors. If those two points are ground down can it be seen when S4 intake is on.
Old 06-22-2005, 03:27 PM
  #6  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
Was that a typo where you wrote that you have an "'83 S block"? Did you mean to say '85? I didn't think the 4.7L motors had enough wall thickness to be bored to 104mm. You would be working with the 16v heads also, which may not be optimum with the larger displacement.
No typo. It's ROW '83 S 4.7L block. There's no hope what so ever to use it as outside diameter is about 112mm. It can maybe be bored to 100mm but not 1mm more. I used it only to show those two mounting points in hope that someone could verify if '85-86 32V block has those exact same points or some totally different ones.
Old 06-22-2005, 03:31 PM
  #7  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
I wasn't able to measure more than just the top faces of my spare '85 block's cylinder walls, but they range between 8mm and 7mm. The inner two cylinders on either side have thinner walls (ie 7mm at their thinnest point). Again I know this is very rough, I don't have a caliper handy.
Damn, I would have expected them all to be few mm's more meaning block would have 7mm left after 4mm overbore. Is there no holy grail to hunt for?

Anyway, thanks for the information to everyone. Keep it coming.
Old 06-22-2005, 04:21 PM
  #8  
mpesik
Banned
 
mpesik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on a huge ball
Posts: 7,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those are great pics. The snap of the 2 blocks together is.....................beautiful
Old 06-22-2005, 04:49 PM
  #9  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Mike thanks ... I do agree.
Old 06-22-2005, 04:52 PM
  #10  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Errka wrote:

>>>Damn, I would have expected them all to be few mm's more meaning block would have 7mm left after 4mm overbore.

Erkka,

Are you taking into account that a 4mm overbore would only reduce the wall thickness by 2mm?

If Renyolds says .250" (6.35mm) for minimum wall thickness, that means that you need to start at .330" (8.35mm) wall thickness for the 4mm overbore. I've seen varying cylinder thicknesses in bare blocks. Maybe Thurston can chime in here, but I think when I took a caliper to his '85 block there were all in this range. They are out there, just got to keep looking.
Old 06-22-2005, 05:00 PM
  #11  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
Are you taking into account that a 4mm overbore would only reduce the wall thickness by 2mm?
Yes Adam, 7mm - 2mm makes it THIN by my standards also
Old 06-22-2005, 05:02 PM
  #12  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Right you are Errka. But, no guts no glory.

-Adam
Old 06-22-2005, 05:44 PM
  #13  
Dave Howerdel
Three Wheelin'
 
Dave Howerdel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
And they are exact same as in pictures?
Here is a shot of the 85 sans intake. (Pardon the mess)

Old 06-22-2005, 06:50 PM
  #14  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Howerdel
Here is a shot of the 85 sans intake. (Pardon the mess)

Thank you Dave. Looks about same as '83 S. Makes sense that factory used same moulds and only increased cylinder outside diameter when they could get away with it until S4.
Old 06-22-2005, 11:13 PM
  #15  
Normy
Banned
 
Normy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FLORIDA
Posts: 5,248
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

OK I got all pissed off at DEVEK about two years ago because it seemed like I had to pull their teeth to find out that blocks prior to 1987 had different wall thicknesses! You cannot reliably bore a pre-S4 block to 104 mm. What I learned is than when Porsche cast the earlier blocks, they didn't pay enough attention to where the sand casting sat and some water jackets wound up excessively close to the cylinder. This isn't true with S4 and later blocks. The earlier stuff....If it's bored out...it will bore out fine, but very quickly under use you will crack your cylinder wall. At least on SOME pre S4 blocks....

The later stuff is a completely different story. And then again, steel sleeves are out there too.

N!


Quick Reply: How to recognize perfect block for stroker?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:13 PM.