Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Tangled with an R8 today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2009, 05:23 PM
  #16  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,622
Received 2,189 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
Anthony, the 599 must have been putting along or the roads were pretty twisty, because the 599 should eat just about ANYTHING on the road BIG TIME w/o even breaking a sweat! Maybe it was just the driver.

The 430 Scuderia is close to the 599 in flat out performance and superior on a track or in the twisties if you are willing to risk it all (can't imagine that...) and is at least 2 steps above an R8... The regular 430 is probably just a tick or tick and a half above the R8 as you noted though. The steering feel and directness in a 430 is superior to ANYTHING I have ever driven though. That car was telepathic, and with 510HP F-AAAAAAA-S-T!!
Unfortunately the 599 was relatively new with an older driver with wife and he never got on it as hard which I would have loved to witness. Although he did move along nicely. I agree with you on the Scuderia I would have to say based on performance and if I were to own a newer F car that would be the one. From what I saw my turbo is easily 2 clicks faster than the R8 although I know it had some exhaust work i believe it was stock otherwise. I am confident on the track I would keep up or pass an R8 in my turbo.

Do you know the weight of an F430 off hand? I am roughly running about 6.9 pounds to every 1 hp from what I saw the F430 had no where near the torque of my car which is roughly 460 pound feet. I would have to assume the 430 weighs close to the R8 just on shear size alone. Where these cars win is the F1 tranny's. They shift so quickly that if you blink you loose precious time so having your gear work perfect is everything and you need extra power to keep up on the same level.

So although power to weight has a lot to do with performance so does a quick shifting box. For me shifting is part of the package although not for all but I find these cars to be too much like playing a video game. Impressive and fun but after a while they get played out.

Although, I have to admit they do sound tremendous.
Old 06-10-2009, 05:28 PM
  #17  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

A 2008 F430 coupe is 3200lbs, and the spider is 3351lbs, identical to the older 928 to the last pound even!

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 06-10-2009, 05:35 PM
  #18  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,622
Received 2,189 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
A 2008 F430 coupe is 3200lbs, and the spider is 3351lbs, identical to the older 928 to the last pound even!

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
So roughly 300 pounds +/- less than an R8. The F430 was a spider so it still has a .3 pound to hp advantage over my car so I am assuming the torque is what makes the difference. (Please no debates about torque)
Old 06-10-2009, 05:42 PM
  #19  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well, it seems to me that a spider would be almost exactly the same weight/hp. 3351/490 = 6.84lb/hp. +0.06lb/hp compared to your 6.9 is negligible. Not sure where the 500+hp figure is from for a F430, even the 2009 model is 490hp@8,500RPM and 343lb.ft@5,250RPM.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 06-10-2009, 07:48 PM
  #20  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

And you guys saw my race with the Ferrari Challenge 360 (a step below the 430) a few years back? the quick shifting was cool and so was the sound, but heck, i was right there the entire race with a car worth 10% of this thing. I have a set of headers! Oh, and a street sport suspension. we were pretty evenly matched and about the same weight.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...racing+ferrari


not bad for a 20 year old (18 at the time) 928

mk

Originally Posted by cobalt
So roughly 300 pounds +/- less than an R8. The F430 was a spider so it still has a .3 pound to hp advantage over my car so I am assuming the torque is what makes the difference. (Please no debates about torque)
Old 06-11-2009, 10:05 AM
  #21  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,622
Received 2,189 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Well, it seems to me that a spider would be almost exactly the same weight/hp. 3351/490 = 6.84lb/hp. +0.06lb/hp compared to your 6.9 is negligible. Not sure where the 500+hp figure is from for a F430, even the 2009 model is 490hp@8,500RPM and 343lb.ft@5,250RPM.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
That makes more sense. Thanks for the info.

Mark your a mad man but great stuff.
Old 06-11-2009, 03:19 PM
  #22  
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
pcar928fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Not sure where the 500+hp figure is from for a F430, even the 2009 model is 490hp@8,500RPM and 343lb.ft@5,250RPM.
510 or maybe even 525 is for the 430 Scuderia...which is also a lighter car than the standard 430...



Quick Reply: Tangled with an R8 today



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:49 PM.