Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Injector resources and questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2009, 02:58 PM
  #1  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Injector resources and questions

Group --

Two injector resources that you may be interested in and then a question.

First, here's a catalog of most all fuel injectors know to man. It will not answer all your questions, but it can be used to rule out some definite non-matches. I don't think I've seen this resource posted here yet, but if someone has already done it my apologies:

http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tableifc.htm#tabtop

Second, in case someone is thinking about making their own intake manifold, here are some injector bosses that are available both in aluminum and in steel. The look pretty cool and should weld reasonably easily to a runner:



They aren't cheap, though. $40 per boss plus shipping.

Now, then to questions. I've read most if not all injector threads on the forum. There's a lot of info about replacement injectors. However, I would like to know more about the largest injectors that people are succesfully running with the LH computers. So far, I've found short Siemens Deka high-impedance 60 lbs/h and 83 lbs/h injectors that might work. However, I'd very much appreaciate any comments based on actual experience with very large injectors.
Old 02-23-2009, 03:07 PM
  #2  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the injector boss is very simple, those look overly complex, very large and would lead to a very high profile fuel rail

Actually, i am looking for a low profile injector, something like 2/3rds the height of the current 928 injector. Do you see anything matching that description in their product line?
Old 02-23-2009, 03:26 PM
  #3  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The shorties are in some fords and chevy cars and trucks.
Old 02-23-2009, 03:40 PM
  #4  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

http://suprasonic.org/public_html/so...rs/RCtech.html
Old 02-23-2009, 04:10 PM
  #5  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

The Sharktuner should cope easily up to the 62#. I don't personally know of anyone going over 42# yet with ST but I am sure 62 will be OK.
Old 02-23-2009, 04:39 PM
  #6  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
The Sharktuner should cope easily up to the 62#. I don't personally know of anyone going over 42# yet with ST but I am sure 62 will be OK.
John,

How does the shark tuner work with twin mas air metering devices and twin throttle position sensors?

I know the twin screw setup by DR does this, it is critical to my intake design, im just not exactly sure how the LH handles the signal when it comes from a pair of MAF's and TPS's
Old 02-23-2009, 05:17 PM
  #7  
90 S-4
Pro
 
90 S-4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OC. Calif
Posts: 633
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ptuomov,
I'm interested in those injector bosses, who sells them, great find, Thanks..
Old 02-23-2009, 05:28 PM
  #8  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
The Sharktuner should cope easily up to the 62#. I don't personally know of anyone going over 42# yet with ST but I am sure 62 will be OK.
So the short Siemens Deka #60 high-impedance injectors would work with the reprogrammed '87 fuel computer? My guess is it would. Given the manual transmissions we're forced to live with, I don't think the #83s are necessary.
Old 02-23-2009, 06:08 PM
  #9  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

DR uses only one MAF in one of the intake channels. The other "MAF" is just a dummy.

I am working on a way to combine two active MAFs for the ST.
Old 02-23-2009, 06:09 PM
  #10  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Yes, I believe they would be OK, at rated fuel pressure.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
So the short Siemens Deka #60 high-impedance injectors would work with the reprogrammed '87 fuel computer? My guess is it would. Given the manual transmissions we're forced to live with, I don't think the #83s are necessary.
Old 02-23-2009, 06:27 PM
  #11  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
DR uses only one MAF in one of the intake channels. The other "MAF" is just a dummy.

I am working on a way to combine two active MAFs for the ST.
would you also use 2 TPS switches, or since they would be linked to the same cable from the throttle pedal, you would really only need one TPS sensor reading off a single throttle body?
Old 02-23-2009, 06:49 PM
  #12  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

As the WOT switch part seems so failure prone, maybe it would be a good idea to have two connected in parallel :-)
Old 02-23-2009, 06:59 PM
  #13  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
DR uses only one MAF in one of the intake channels. The other "MAF" is just a dummy. I am working on a way to combine two active MAFs for the ST.
I can't hook up a toaster the right way, so please bear with me on this question: Why not just "average" the two MAF signals? What I am thinking about here is

MAF1 -> resistor -> output terminal <- resistor <- MAF2

Wouldn't this about "average" the two signals voltages? I don't think this MAF signal has to "drive" anything so maybe this would work.

See http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_8/8.html

If the plenums are connected at some point, the LH / sharktuner should then function as before.

Completelymisunderstoodthisagain?
Old 02-23-2009, 07:13 PM
  #14  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 547 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

I think you need the SUM of the two airflows, not the average. Your average signal would give you half of actual total Assuming that they are both passing exactly the same amount of air, then doubling the 'average' would hardly be the right way either. I'm sticking with SUM, final answer.
Old 02-23-2009, 07:21 PM
  #15  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Respectfully disagreeing

Originally Posted by dr bob
I think you need the SUM of the two airflows, not the average. Your average signal would give you half of actual total Assuming that they are both passing exactly the same amount of air, then doubling the 'average' would hardly be the right way either. I'm sticking with SUM, final answer.
Sum could be produced with an op amplifier. However, I don't think SUM is what we want. The stock fuel computer goes nuts with over 6v, since it expects 0-5v. That's why you always have to feed in 0-5v.

Now, as you correctly point out, with stock maps the computer feeds in only half the fuel. But the map can be changed to feed in more for a give MAF signal level.

Effectively, the hardware is fixed to accept 0-5v, but that can then be internally mapped to whatever desired by changing the fuel maps.


Quick Reply: Injector resources and questions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:18 PM.