Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Engine wizards please chime in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2008 | 12:46 PM
  #16  
mark kibort's Avatar
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29,956
Likes: 180
From: saratoga, ca
Default

ditto what was said.

however, I would leave the heads alone and just do the cams or probably have the cams increased for lift by 1mm as it can work with no lash caps for the hydrolic lifters. that 1mm more lift would give more hp than the increased valve diameter i would imagine.

mk
Old 11-08-2008 | 03:30 PM
  #17  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling
Ryan,
I don't mean to be rude or start anything but unless you have assembled an engine with the oversized valves and measured stock pistons vs 968 pistons, you really need to list your opinions as just that.....
Uh yeah you do, or you woudlnt say it.

Cause i make these posts all the time but i dont start it off with "im not trying to be rude" So lets call it what it is, i can respect that

Your right i haven't put together a stock block with 39mm intake valves. I do believe my original post did mention that "i dont think" but let me go back and check it out and i will adjust it if necessary...... or do we think the point has already been made?
Old 11-08-2008 | 03:35 PM
  #18  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Sterling,

This is my original unedited post, you can see whats CLEARLY said in the beginning.

I also believe you said that everything does fit, but just barely. And as you mentioned when you take into account an engine expanding when its warm then you may have contact. Agreed

I dont know what your talking about when you mention 968 pistons. That was never discussed in this thread......... or i really missed that one. This would be a stock bottom end (new rods) and heads modified to fit the 39mm 968 intake valves (WHICH ROGER IS PRATICALLY GIVING AWAY! )

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
Jim,

I am no expert here but think i can handle this one

No the pistons dont need any modifications, only the heads and their seats.

The S3 cams do need to be modified but i dont know specifically how, I do know they are apparently the same as GT cams but they are longer physically so must be cut down or something like that.

I know Roger was talking about replacing rods in his car which he will keep at 5.4L. I would replace those i guess. Please do tell, what rod manufacturer your using and what those were going to run.

And it was a pleasure to meet you at Sharktoberfest last month

Cheers
I think its safe to say that my post was stated simply as opinion, I do see "I think" in there.
Old 11-08-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #19  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling
968 engines use 968 intake valves... measure the intake valve pockets on the 968 pistons to see the clearance needed for the larger valves. 968's have larger valve pockets than S4...

I really didn't mean to be rude... but even saying that you think you can handle that is an opinion.... and you need to clearly state that you have done no comparisons..... or measurements....

I've had them side by side the pistons as well as the valves, done the measurements with calipers and done contact tests with clay. If you don't notch the pistion, don't even bother having the work done for the intake valves as you will have issues. Porsche saw fit to have larger pockets for larger valves... so that is one thing I'm not going to try to re engineer how much tolerance is needed.
Sterling,

I don't doubt you've done this work. Youve done a hell of allot for engine development and i love reading your posts.

I thought it was clear that I thought i could handle the post, CLEARLY you think i was wrong, so thats cool, i stand corrected. So to my original post saying no you dont need to cut the pistons, I am wrong, i dont know what the hell im talking about when it comes to 968 valves and otherwise stock 928 pistons.

lets not make this some war or words, your right im wrong
Old 11-08-2008 | 06:22 PM
  #20  
6.0-928S's Avatar
6.0-928S
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 1
From: Conshohocken,Pa.
Default

Sterling is correct. When I built my motor I flycut my own pistons myself in a Bridgeport to accept the larger valves, not only for the valve head diameter but also deeper for several reasons. Although I did install heavier valve springs, valve float is always a possibility. Also I wanted extra room for higher lift cams in the future. With all the effort & money I put into my engine, mods were made with reliability insurance in mind. Can't afford to do it twice. And if I decide to do more radical mods later the shortblock was done so it could handle the additional power. So the pistons were flycut to handle any future mods as well as engine tolerance 'malfunctions'.

Hammer
Old 11-08-2008 | 07:12 PM
  #21  
john gill's Avatar
john gill
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 512
Likes: 8
From: Mount Mort, Ipswich , Australia
Default

The piston cutouts are deep enough but not wide enough , you will need to widen the intake cutouts to allow for the wider 968(928 part no.) valves , yes I would rebalance the assembly just to be sure , the newer rods should be same as the the older ones given newer construction,

PS the cutouts are deep enough to take larger lift cams than the modified s3 cams.

Old 11-08-2008 | 08:54 PM
  #22  
docmirror's Avatar
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 101
From: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Default

I spoke with Elgin a few days ago. He is no longer modifying the S3 cams for S4 heads. I'm looking into a new source for the cam changes. Should have some info late next week.
Old 11-08-2008 | 09:09 PM
  #23  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
I spoke with Elgin a few days ago. He is no longer modifying the S3 cams for S4 heads. I'm looking into a new source for the cam changes. Should have some info late next week.
Any specific reason why? Just not making enough money on them i imagine?
Old 11-08-2008 | 09:35 PM
  #24  
Tony's Avatar
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 14,676
Likes: 585
From: Las Vegas
Default

Jim, i'd put about 5-7psi though that engine and a good crank case vent system to wake it up long before i'd start messing with heads and valves. Heck even 3-5psi makes a huge difference. Each his own
Old 11-08-2008 | 09:47 PM
  #25  
docmirror's Avatar
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 101
From: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
Any specific reason why? Just not making enough money on them i imagine?
He's semi-retired. doesn't want to fool with it anymore. Let most of his employees go, and now just futzing around in his shop. He didn't sound very interested in doing any more Porsche work at all.
Old 11-08-2008 | 10:10 PM
  #26  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
He's semi-retired. doesn't want to fool with it anymore. Let most of his employees go, and now just futzing around in his shop. He didn't sound very interested in doing any more Porsche work at all.
ha ha we must have scared him off no doubt!
Old 11-09-2008 | 10:17 PM
  #27  
Jim M.'s Avatar
Jim M.
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,047
Likes: 906
From: DFW Texas
Talking

In general GTS motors have incredibly mild cams.....and respond VERY well to GT cams..... Around 330+ whp with just the cams.....

With 85-86 cams modified to fit would be similar....of course having those reground by elgin would be a monster....maybe 400whp?
__________________
Brian
Iceman, Now your seeing the big picture!
Old 11-10-2008 | 02:54 PM
  #28  
IcemanG17's Avatar
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,271
Likes: 75
From: Stockton, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Jim M.
Iceman, Now your seeing the big picture!
This is true......if Porsche would have put a GT cam in the GTS it would have easily been 400 crank HP & about 40hp higher than the 911 turbo of its day (1994 turbo 3.6) and would have been 85 hp higher than the 315hp 91-92 turbos
Old 11-10-2008 | 10:28 PM
  #29  
andy-gts's Avatar
andy-gts
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 12
From: lawrence,kansas
Default

Hi Jim,
I am putting in gt like cams from drnick right now and hope to have more hp ...but the sc is already installed and I have the sharktuner and programmable chips in it now also...I can un hook the sc and blow some chips with the cams installed and give you an Idea of the hp gain just from the cams if you like.
andy
Old 11-10-2008 | 10:50 PM
  #30  
mark kibort's Avatar
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29,956
Likes: 180
From: saratoga, ca
Default

now that elgin is out of the 928 cam business, i guess ill have to figure out a way to fix the broken sprocket Holbert cams. I heard there was a guy in Canada that could fix and replace the sprockets on solid sprocket cams. I did get a quote for about $1000 to fix them. However, with a little base circle grind, that could be a hot cam for about $1500.

I would like to eventually get a set of stock S4 heads and put 968 valves in them, with the modified cam, bolt it all up to the new stroker motor. that way, i could replace all the stock stuff on the original Holbert engine.

mk


Quick Reply: Engine wizards please chime in



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:40 PM.