Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Interest in 968 or 944S2 pistons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2008, 10:12 PM
  #16  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

That is cheap.
Old 11-01-2008, 02:00 AM
  #17  
ShawnSmith
Pro
 
ShawnSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

...and then there's the piston's Greg has made based on the 968 piston as a starting point....
Old 11-01-2008, 09:34 AM
  #18  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,133
Received 68 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark anderson
I have 2 sets of used S2 pistons and 2 sets of 968 pistons. $400 per set. I also have a few new 928 104.5 pistons.
What would be the CR with S2 pistons and 85/86 32 v heads?
Old 11-01-2008, 10:45 AM
  #19  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Carter
What would be the CR with S2 pistons and 85/86 32 v heads?
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.

Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Old 11-01-2008, 11:30 AM
  #20  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,133
Received 68 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.

Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Thanks; looks like it may work for me as I would use the stock crank and have boost. Mark I'm interested and will try and get in touch with you Monday.
Old 11-03-2008, 01:02 PM
  #21  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,325
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.

Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
what about a GT fitted with these - what displacement and compression ratio will it have?

what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
Old 11-03-2008, 01:12 PM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

That would be a great engine with a stock GTS crank. but, a lot of work. I think you could make more mods on the GTS to make near the same result for a lot less hassle. big valve heads, have the GT cam reground for more lift and some dyno tuning could get you in the near 400rwhp range!

mk

Originally Posted by Cheburator
what about a GT fitted with these - what displacement and compression ratio will it have?

what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
Old 11-03-2008, 02:16 PM
  #23  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheburator
what about a GT fitted with these - what displacement and compression ratio will it have?
S4/GT crank + custom rods + 104mm 944 S2 pistons = 5362cc and around 9.5:1 CR depending on what numbers are used.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/344250-head-and-piston-top-cc-numbers.html#post4073230
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/455702-sbc-swap-pros-and-cons-who-bought-the-renegade-mounts-and-kit.html#post5828260
http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
GTS crank + custom rods + 104mm 944 S2 pistons = 5838cc and around 10.2:1 CR depending on what numbers are used. Big intake valves would need larger holes on pistons and CR would suffer a little as 944 S2 has 37mm intake valve.

Closest to 6.2 using commonly available parts is 100.5mm 1st oversize S4/GT pistons + custom rods + stroker crank = 6045cc and around 10.6-11.6 CR depending on what pistons and numbers are used. That would be interesting engine. I would build it using 100mm stock size GT pistons to keep cost even more down down to earth and give later option of rebuild using 1st oversize if necessary. Result is 6045cc and CR very good for racing 11.2-11.5:1. Basically you would need $2500-3000 Moldex crank and $1500 custom rods. All the rest would be stock GT parts. Only trouble is that much of the piston skirt would need to be removed so that they would work in block at BDC. This means other way round ie. stock crank and 104mm pistons is much easier and it costs less very likely also. Down side is lower displacement.

I have 8 Mahle 944 S2 104mm standard size tolerance group 1 pistons which obviously have full skirt. Plan is to try them into 104 bore stroker block before putting KS 968 in there for actual stroker engine build just to see how such setup would work. If normal S4/GT or even GTS crank works together with them it would be slightly cheaper way to get larger displacement than full bore stroker.
Old 11-03-2008, 02:23 PM
  #24  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,325
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
That would be a great engine with a stock GTS crank. but, a lot of work. I think you could make more mods on the GTS to make near the same result for a lot less hassle. big valve heads, have the GT cam reground for more lift and some dyno tuning could get you in the near 400rwhp range!

mk
Mark,

I was thinking - bore the spare GT block out to accept the 968 pistons, put the GTS crank and 968 valved heads, with GT-reground cams into it and hey presto, I would have a monster 5.9ltr engine making stupid bhp (for its size) and still have a steel linered GTS -block + GTS pistons with less than 20k miles lying spare in the garage in case the Gods of Nurburgring demand their due.

Machnist charges - to bore out the block - in Bulgaria are stupidly cheap. Building the 2 x GTS heads with new ceramic seats, new guides, new seals, tri-angle cutting of the new 968 valves cost me around $700

Thus, it could be a possible path...
Old 11-03-2008, 02:31 PM
  #25  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheburator
Machnist charges - to bore out the block - in Bulgaria are stupidly cheap.
And he has correct tools and experience for Alusil? In any case your largest problem is to find block which has enough material for 104mm bore.
Old 11-03-2008, 02:42 PM
  #26  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,325
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
And he has correct tools and experience for Alusil? In any case your largest problem is to find block which has enough material for 104mm bore.
This guy has been building race engines for about 30 years - mainly BMW ///M stuff but has also been trained by Mercedes to work on alusil blocks. He has already bored a S2 to accept 100m pistons...

Why would I need custom rods - could I not use my GTS rods with 968/S2 small skirt pistons?
Old 11-03-2008, 02:51 PM
  #27  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheburator
This guy has been building race engines for about 30 years - mainly BMW ///M stuff but has also been trained by Mercedes to work on alusil blocks. He has already bored a S2 to accept 100m pistons...
Sounds really good.

Why would I need custom rods - could I not use my GTS rods with 968/S2 small skirt pistons?
944 S2 and 968 pistons have smaller compression height than 5L or GTS pistons. There is difference between 5L and GTS also. IIRR 5L crank and 150mm stock rods would be more than 2mm below deck level at TDC and GTS more than 1mm. This would kill CR ratio also. Besided GTS rods are worst possible stock rods to use, doesn't matter if they are late '94-95 MY ...2R version.
Old 11-03-2008, 03:13 PM
  #28  
Mark Anderson
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Mark Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 7,044
Received 350 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

if you are looking for displacement I have the following

Scat stroker crank $2,000
Oliver 5.85 rods $1,000
968 pistons $ 400

this will give you 6.5 liter
Old 11-03-2008, 03:43 PM
  #29  
Abby Normal
In Your Face, Ace
Rennlist Member

 
Abby Normal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,120
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.

Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
I used 951 pistons and that made it 8:1
Old 11-03-2008, 08:17 PM
  #30  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,325
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark anderson
if you are looking for displacement I have the following

Scat stroker crank $2,000
Oliver 5.85 rods $1,000
968 pistons $ 400

this will give you 6.5 liter

Too big...

Only allowed 6.2ltrs max displacement. That's why the 2 Zakspeed Vipers run on 8 cylinders only


Quick Reply: Interest in 968 or 944S2 pistons?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:33 PM.