Interest in 968 or 944S2 pistons?
#18
Rennlist Member
#19
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
#20
Rennlist Member
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
#21
Rennlist Member
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
#22
Rennlist Member
That would be a great engine with a stock GTS crank. but, a lot of work. I think you could make more mods on the GTS to make near the same result for a lot less hassle. big valve heads, have the GT cam reground for more lift and some dyno tuning could get you in the near 400rwhp range!
mk
mk
what about a GT fitted with these - what displacement and compression ratio will it have?
what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/344250-head-and-piston-top-cc-numbers.html#post4073230
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/455702-sbc-swap-pros-and-cons-who-bought-the-renegade-mounts-and-kit.html#post5828260
http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html
what about a GTS with these - 5.9ltrs, but what compression ratio? could be potentially interesting, given that my class is restricted to 6.2 ltrs, and i have 968-valved GTS heads sitting in their box...
Closest to 6.2 using commonly available parts is 100.5mm 1st oversize S4/GT pistons + custom rods + stroker crank = 6045cc and around 10.6-11.6 CR depending on what pistons and numbers are used. That would be interesting engine. I would build it using 100mm stock size GT pistons to keep cost even more down down to earth and give later option of rebuild using 1st oversize if necessary. Result is 6045cc and CR very good for racing 11.2-11.5:1. Basically you would need $2500-3000 Moldex crank and $1500 custom rods. All the rest would be stock GT parts. Only trouble is that much of the piston skirt would need to be removed so that they would work in block at BDC. This means other way round ie. stock crank and 104mm pistons is much easier and it costs less very likely also. Down side is lower displacement.
I have 8 Mahle 944 S2 104mm standard size tolerance group 1 pistons which obviously have full skirt. Plan is to try them into 104 bore stroker block before putting KS 968 in there for actual stroker engine build just to see how such setup would work. If normal S4/GT or even GTS crank works together with them it would be slightly cheaper way to get larger displacement than full bore stroker.
#24
Rennlist Member
That would be a great engine with a stock GTS crank. but, a lot of work. I think you could make more mods on the GTS to make near the same result for a lot less hassle. big valve heads, have the GT cam reground for more lift and some dyno tuning could get you in the near 400rwhp range!
mk
mk
I was thinking - bore the spare GT block out to accept the 968 pistons, put the GTS crank and 968 valved heads, with GT-reground cams into it and hey presto, I would have a monster 5.9ltr engine making stupid bhp (for its size) and still have a steel linered GTS -block + GTS pistons with less than 20k miles lying spare in the garage in case the Gods of Nurburgring demand their due.
Machnist charges - to bore out the block - in Bulgaria are stupidly cheap. Building the 2 x GTS heads with new ceramic seats, new guides, new seals, tri-angle cutting of the new 968 valves cost me around $700
Thus, it could be a possible path...
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#26
Rennlist Member
Why would I need custom rods - could I not use my GTS rods with 968/S2 small skirt pistons?
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Why would I need custom rods - could I not use my GTS rods with 968/S2 small skirt pistons?
#28
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
if you are looking for displacement I have the following
Scat stroker crank $2,000
Oliver 5.85 rods $1,000
968 pistons $ 400
this will give you 6.5 liter
Scat stroker crank $2,000
Oliver 5.85 rods $1,000
968 pistons $ 400
this will give you 6.5 liter
#29
In Your Face, Ace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Around 9.5:1 with 95.25mm stroke crank and 5.85" rods. Any other combination and things start to get interesting. Stock S3 crank and custom lenght rods would give low 8:1 or high 7:1 for example.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
Stock valves are too small I think and part of the fun from larger displacement is lost.
#30
Rennlist Member