As of today Oct 1st, no more "cats" in Mass. for any 928!!
#16
Sounds like they decided to draw a line at OBD-II, pretty cool. And surprising coming from that liberal-Dem haven. Here in Jaw-ja we have a 25-year rolling exemption, so my car no longer requires them but '84 has one more year. I just had mine tested for the helluvit and passed with flying colors, nope no mods going on here.
#18
Heck, all you guys are lucky compared to us in the Republic of Kalifornia. They stopped the rolling date, and are stuck at 1975. So basically, that's it, no waiting a year to get that car you've always wanted to tinker with.
Ugh.. engine swaps here are pretty difficult.
Ugh.. engine swaps here are pretty difficult.
#19
- lifting it to check the front wheel bearings
- jamming it repeatedly into "1st" when it keeps going backwards
I run cats on all of mine and will continue to do so. The exception would be the '89 once it becomes a dedicated track car.
IMO, no-cats is just too damn loud if you have an RMB. It's a lot louder if you have an X-pipe w/o cats. It's NASCAR loud if you've got GT cams with an RMB and a test pipe. I cannot imagine how loud my '91 would be with no cats, x-pipe, RMB and the SC. I'm going to bet it would make ears bleed.
And yes, it still is not legal to 'tamper' with the emissions control systems.
Nevertheless, getting a 928 inspected in Mass now has a much lower stress factor.
#20
I am running cats on both and will continue to do so, but have had dual slight NOx issues this year (HC & CO are ok).
I think the 86.5 is simply lean...ARM-1 goes to full rich as it should on full throttle then falls back to stable RED LIGHT, which is where it sits regardless of throttle/idle and hardly ever hunts at all; recent O2 sensor. I believe it's trying to fight a vacuum leak at the throttle body->center intake tube. That and/or there is a fuel pressure problem that goes away momentarily when the f/p damper does its thing when punched, and/or there is a short in the TPS idle switch that is overridden by a working WOT signal (anyone know what LH does if it gets BOTH closed and WOT signals?). Either way, intake removal coming
The ARM-1 behaves as it should on the GT, so not, apparently, lean, but some other issue (maybe needs a new cat, or maybe patching the small cracks in the headers and plugging the open AI bung on the cat helped, but I decided just to wait rather than retest).
I think the 86.5 is simply lean...ARM-1 goes to full rich as it should on full throttle then falls back to stable RED LIGHT, which is where it sits regardless of throttle/idle and hardly ever hunts at all; recent O2 sensor. I believe it's trying to fight a vacuum leak at the throttle body->center intake tube. That and/or there is a fuel pressure problem that goes away momentarily when the f/p damper does its thing when punched, and/or there is a short in the TPS idle switch that is overridden by a working WOT signal (anyone know what LH does if it gets BOTH closed and WOT signals?). Either way, intake removal coming
The ARM-1 behaves as it should on the GT, so not, apparently, lean, but some other issue (maybe needs a new cat, or maybe patching the small cracks in the headers and plugging the open AI bung on the cat helped, but I decided just to wait rather than retest).
#21
And the carbon footprint of manufactering the green car is equivelant to driving the catless car 80,000 miles.
#22