"Our 928 Porsche headers showed an astonishing 23% horsepower gain..."
#31
Three Wheelin'
#32
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As far as ability of an exhaust system to flow enough air for a given amount of horsepower without causing significant back pressure, this is from one of David Vizard's books:
1. For avoiding significant restriction from back pressure, the pipe should flow at least 2.2CFM per horsepower produced.
2. A straight pipe will flow ~115CFM per square inch of area (using inside diameter of the pipe)
1. For avoiding significant restriction from back pressure, the pipe should flow at least 2.2CFM per horsepower produced.
2. A straight pipe will flow ~115CFM per square inch of area (using inside diameter of the pipe)
Is there a system that will fit the 85 with the big battery box?
Last edited by Rick Carter; 08-30-2008 at 02:44 PM.
#33
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I found this:
So a single 3" is good for 369 hp and dual 2.5" is good for513 hp according to this formula.I'm guessing this is crank hp so I should "upgrade"; edit or a single 3.5" is good for 502 hp and a single 4" is good for 657 hp.
Is there a system that will fit the 85 with the big battery box?
So a single 3" is good for 369 hp and dual 2.5" is good for513 hp according to this formula.I'm guessing this is crank hp so I should "upgrade"; edit or a single 3.5" is good for 502 hp and a single 4" is good for 657 hp.
Is there a system that will fit the 85 with the big battery box?
Weld in the bung, I can post pictures of the device Mike Schmidt made to screw into the bung with a vacuum fitting attached.
Run the vacuum line into the cabin, attach the gauge and go for a drive. If you see over 1-2psi....it's not flowing enough.
#34
Inventor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Single exhausts are much more difficult to control noise with.
So the factory 52mm ID pipes will flow only ~293 rwhp comfortably? (My best dyno runs flatten out at the top, like they hit a wall. 52mm ID pipe after the 59.5mm ID X-pipe.)
Dual 2½" OD (59.5mm ID) = ~383 rwhp
52mm = 2.047" = 3.291"² * 115cfm = 378.553cfm * 2 = 757.106cfm / 2.2 = 344.139chp - 15% = 292.518rwhp
59.5mm = 2.342" = 4.309"² * 115cfm = 495.626cfm * 2 = 991.252cfm / 2.2 = 450.569chp - 15% = 382.983rwhp
So the factory 52mm ID pipes will flow only ~293 rwhp comfortably? (My best dyno runs flatten out at the top, like they hit a wall. 52mm ID pipe after the 59.5mm ID X-pipe.)
Dual 2½" OD (59.5mm ID) = ~383 rwhp
52mm = 2.047" = 3.291"² * 115cfm = 378.553cfm * 2 = 757.106cfm / 2.2 = 344.139chp - 15% = 292.518rwhp
59.5mm = 2.342" = 4.309"² * 115cfm = 495.626cfm * 2 = 991.252cfm / 2.2 = 450.569chp - 15% = 382.983rwhp
Last edited by PorKen; 08-30-2008 at 04:02 PM.
#35
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Notice that the book excerpt says "straight pipe". You have restriction to flow every time the pipe makes a bend. Keep that in mind when building your exhaust.
#36
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#37
Three Wheelin'
#38
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I found this:
So a single 3" is good for 369 hp and dual 2.5" is good for513 hp according to this formula.I'm guessing this is crank hp so I should "upgrade"; edit or a single 3.5" is good for 502 hp and a single 4" is good for 657 hp.
Is there a system that will fit the 85 with the big battery box?
So a single 3" is good for 369 hp and dual 2.5" is good for513 hp according to this formula.I'm guessing this is crank hp so I should "upgrade"; edit or a single 3.5" is good for 502 hp and a single 4" is good for 657 hp.
Is there a system that will fit the 85 with the big battery box?
It's my personal preference to use dual pipes on a car you'll be driving on the street. IMHO, they sound better and you can muffle them better. Even if loud they still sound nice if there is a suitable crossover. The large (>3.5" OD) pipes have advantages for a track car being lighter and somewhat easier to route, but it's really difficult to muffle well. I did some dyno tests on single 3.5" vs dual 2.5" and the duals gave better mid range torque although top end was the same. Not sure what effect, if any, there would be on a SC car.
There is no problem in getting a 2.5" pipe between the diff housing and battery box. I built a dual pipe system for my neighbors '85 several years ago.
#39
Drifting
#40
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rick,
It's my personal preference to use dual pipes on a car you'll be driving on the street. IMHO, they sound better and you can muffle them better. Even if loud they still sound nice if there is a suitable crossover. The large (>3.5" OD) pipes have advantages for a track car being lighter and somewhat easier to route, but it's really difficult to muffle well. I did some dyno tests on single 3.5" vs dual 2.5" and the duals gave better mid range torque although top end was the same. Not sure what effect, if any, there would be on a SC car.
There is no problem in getting a 2.5" pipe between the diff housing and battery box. I built a dual pipe system for my neighbors '85 several years ago.
It's my personal preference to use dual pipes on a car you'll be driving on the street. IMHO, they sound better and you can muffle them better. Even if loud they still sound nice if there is a suitable crossover. The large (>3.5" OD) pipes have advantages for a track car being lighter and somewhat easier to route, but it's really difficult to muffle well. I did some dyno tests on single 3.5" vs dual 2.5" and the duals gave better mid range torque although top end was the same. Not sure what effect, if any, there would be on a SC car.
There is no problem in getting a 2.5" pipe between the diff housing and battery box. I built a dual pipe system for my neighbors '85 several years ago.
I will start looking for an )( and a shop that can fabricate mandrel exhaust. Thanks Louie.
Hacker,
I should be able to use my WB bung to check back pressure, I would like to see pics of the set up. Thanks.
#41
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#42
Three Wheelin'
#44
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Supercharged engines need to be a little careful about exhaust size. This is especially true when the cams are not designed for supercharging as in the 928s. You can easily get into a situation where during the valve overlap period some of the incoming (pressurized above atmosheric) charge gets blown out the exhaust valve. You are going to need some backpressure to minimize that. How much is the question. You want to end up with a situation that puts the greatest incoming charge in the cylinder when the intake valve closes. The N/A rules for backpressure and exhaust pipe size don't hold up when supercharging. The 400 hp Audi with 3" pipe that John has is an example. I'm not saying the 3" exhaust is good for a 400hp 928, and maybe it isn't even the best for the Audi. It's an example of the exhaust being smaller than it seems like it should be, yet does work. Turbo charged engines are entirely different in exhaust requirements.
In your case, the 3" single seems like it's small and would be by N/A standards. However, it may not be for your engine. When I was working up Jim Hurtt's SC installation, Jim wanted 500 rwhp as a goal. He bought a set of headers for it, and I was going to build a nice dual 3" system using them. I worked up some exhaust system mods on Engine Analyzer simulator. I was surprised to see that there would be no big difference between a dual 2.5" system using stock exhaust manifold and the headers with dual 3" pipes. I stayed with the stock manifolds, X pipe, and dual 2.5" system and he got his 500 rwhp at 9 lbs boost. I did some other work to the intake system too which did help.
Before doing a lot of work to change your exhaust I'd do one test. Take your car to a dyno. Do a few baseline runs to establish power on that day. Then remove your exhaust behind the Y. Do a couple more runs to see if there is much difference. That'll tell you if the length of 3" pipe is having a big effect. If you see more than 10-15hp, then either get a 3.5" pipe, or go to dual 2.5" pipe. If no 20hp gain, then the 3" single is probably a good compromise. The 3" full exhaust may give more mid range torque than without. You may prefer the fatter mid range even if the top end is down some. Without the rear exhaust, it'll be loud and the dyno guy will probably whine and grumble. They'll live through a couple runs. The dyno result removes speculation and can save money in the long run.
#45
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rick,
Supercharged engines need to be a little careful about exhaust size. This is especially true when the cams are not designed for supercharging as in the 928s. You can easily get into a situation where during the valve overlap period some of the incoming (pressurized above atmosheric) charge gets blown out the exhaust valve. You are going to need some backpressure to minimize that. How much is the question. You want to end up with a situation that puts the greatest incoming charge in the cylinder when the intake valve closes. The N/A rules for backpressure and exhaust pipe size don't hold up when supercharging. The 400 hp Audi with 3" pipe that John has is an example. I'm not saying the 3" exhaust is good for a 400hp 928, and maybe it isn't even the best for the Audi. It's an example of the exhaust being smaller than it seems like it should be, yet does work. Turbo charged engines are entirely different in exhaust requirements.
In your case, the 3" single seems like it's small and would be by N/A standards. However, it may not be for your engine. When I was working up Jim Hurtt's SC installation, Jim wanted 500 rwhp as a goal. He bought a set of headers for it, and I was going to build a nice dual 3" system using them. I worked up some exhaust system mods on Engine Analyzer simulator. I was surprised to see that there would be no big difference between a dual 2.5" system using stock exhaust manifold and the headers with dual 3" pipes. I stayed with the stock manifolds, X pipe, and dual 2.5" system and he got his 500 rwhp at 9 lbs boost. I did some other work to the intake system too which did help.
Before doing a lot of work to change your exhaust I'd do one test. Take your car to a dyno. Do a few baseline runs to establish power on that day. Then remove your exhaust behind the Y. Do a couple more runs to see if there is much difference. That'll tell you if the length of 3" pipe is having a big effect. If you see more than 10-15hp, then either get a 3.5" pipe, or go to dual 2.5" pipe. If no 20hp gain, then the 3" single is probably a good compromise. The 3" full exhaust may give more mid range torque than without. You may prefer the fatter mid range even if the top end is down some. Without the rear exhaust, it'll be loud and the dyno guy will probably whine and grumble. They'll live through a couple runs. The dyno result removes speculation and can save money in the long run.
Supercharged engines need to be a little careful about exhaust size. This is especially true when the cams are not designed for supercharging as in the 928s. You can easily get into a situation where during the valve overlap period some of the incoming (pressurized above atmosheric) charge gets blown out the exhaust valve. You are going to need some backpressure to minimize that. How much is the question. You want to end up with a situation that puts the greatest incoming charge in the cylinder when the intake valve closes. The N/A rules for backpressure and exhaust pipe size don't hold up when supercharging. The 400 hp Audi with 3" pipe that John has is an example. I'm not saying the 3" exhaust is good for a 400hp 928, and maybe it isn't even the best for the Audi. It's an example of the exhaust being smaller than it seems like it should be, yet does work. Turbo charged engines are entirely different in exhaust requirements.
In your case, the 3" single seems like it's small and would be by N/A standards. However, it may not be for your engine. When I was working up Jim Hurtt's SC installation, Jim wanted 500 rwhp as a goal. He bought a set of headers for it, and I was going to build a nice dual 3" system using them. I worked up some exhaust system mods on Engine Analyzer simulator. I was surprised to see that there would be no big difference between a dual 2.5" system using stock exhaust manifold and the headers with dual 3" pipes. I stayed with the stock manifolds, X pipe, and dual 2.5" system and he got his 500 rwhp at 9 lbs boost. I did some other work to the intake system too which did help.
Before doing a lot of work to change your exhaust I'd do one test. Take your car to a dyno. Do a few baseline runs to establish power on that day. Then remove your exhaust behind the Y. Do a couple more runs to see if there is much difference. That'll tell you if the length of 3" pipe is having a big effect. If you see more than 10-15hp, then either get a 3.5" pipe, or go to dual 2.5" pipe. If no 20hp gain, then the 3" single is probably a good compromise. The 3" full exhaust may give more mid range torque than without. You may prefer the fatter mid range even if the top end is down some. Without the rear exhaust, it'll be loud and the dyno guy will probably whine and grumble. They'll live through a couple runs. The dyno result removes speculation and can save money in the long run.