Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

90 GT suddenly running very rough

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2008, 06:11 AM
  #61  
astvic
Intermediate
 
astvic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the "not running on all cylinders" issue.
Everything is fine today

My conclusion was the COILS and IGNITION MODULES (also mentioned earlier).
With new coils the car suddenly changed dramaticly.
Much more power in the ignition !!!! totally new engine expirence.
Try to change them with some new once. If they only perform let's say 50% (you can only measure there performance only if they are electrically intact or not) then there wouldn't be enough "power" to ignit. (just my therory)
After that I changed the ignition modules. The bad coil can and will damage the ignition modules (from what I have heard).
My coils was the original onces (18 years old) .

Just an input.
Don't forget to exercise the spark plug connectors !!!!!!!!!!!
All mine looked good and also measured correct (3 ohm), but when I took under specail care, two of them broked. Just as easy as a boiled sausage. Afterward I could see that they actually was broken. Only 15% of the plastic in the 90 degree angle was intact. (if you now what I mean)
Old 07-12-2008, 06:37 AM
  #62  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Hi Stan,
Don't forget that until the engine water temperature gets up to around 70C, the car is running open loop.
this is a good time to be able to properly evaluate the MAF as fuelling is dependant on MAF calibration in this phase of running. At very low water temps there is mixture enrichment from the LH, but from about 40-70degC the engine should run well.

Cat equipped cars can tolerate quite bad MAF ageing when water temp is high enough for the O2 loop to take control. It can cope with quite severe MAf ageing once fully "adapted". (say up to 10 % or so.)

The 3% that Jon mentioned is the point at which throttle response and WOT power can suffer, because under those situtaions the O2 sensor is ignored, and the car is again open loop, and MAF calibration is critical.

In your case I would consider the possibility of a bad injector.......
Old 07-12-2008, 07:00 AM
  #63  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by The_Remora
One year old gas?!? thats enough time for that stuff to turn back into dinosaurs!

His year old gas has 'appreciated' monetarily by a lot.

Stan, think you're running diesel in that car after aging for a year.
Good luck with getting her running.


Any chance to drain tank and run a few gallons of the $4.70 stuff in there.
Cheapest I saw around Lime Rock was $4.59 for premium.

Heard the classic motorcycle guys were having the worst fuel related problems till they put in fresh gas.
Cheapest low cost fix if that is part of the problem.
Old 07-12-2008, 11:33 AM
  #64  
WICruiser
Burning Brakes
 
WICruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chilton Wisconsin
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Unforyunately adding Stable after the fuel has aged for a year doesn't do much good. Once the fuel has degraded there is not much you can do other than get as much out as you can and dilute with fresh fuel.
Old 07-12-2008, 09:11 PM
  #65  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Remember at SITM few years back the fuel pump was powered up and an extraction fuel line attached to the passenger front fuel line (the place where people attach aftermarket fuel pressure gauge).
The pump then pumped fuel from tank out.
Something like that.
This way any questionable fuel in the rails and the line from tank to motor is also pumped out.
Don't know if this helps.
Old 07-12-2008, 09:58 PM
  #66  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 28,245
Received 2,434 Likes on 1,365 Posts
Default

if your trying to pump out bad fuel i would NOT use the fuel pump to do it, just remove the rear pump cover then the soft line to the fuel pump , the fuel will flow out slowly as its going through the screen filter, , eventually most of the fuel will drain out leaving about 4 to 7 ozs depending on how high the rear is. new fuel pumps and filters are very expensive ( no need to pump a few gallons of bad fuel throught your fuel system)
Old 07-13-2008, 02:16 PM
  #67  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Hi Stan,
Don't forget that until the engine water temperature gets up to around 70C, the car is running open loop.
this is a good time to be able to properly evaluate the MAF as fuelling is dependant on MAF calibration in this phase of running. At very low water temps there is mixture enrichment from the LH, but from about 40-70degC the engine should run well.

Cat equipped cars can tolerate quite bad MAF ageing when water temp is high enough for the O2 loop to take control. It can cope with quite severe MAf ageing once fully "adapted". (say up to 10 % or so.)

The 3% that Jon mentioned is the point at which throttle response and WOT power can suffer, because under those situtaions the O2 sensor is ignored, and the car is again open loop, and MAF calibration is critical.

In your case I would consider the possibility of a bad injector.......
I would think a bad injector would be constant, right? When I disconnect the MAF, the car idles as good as it ever has. This is true whether I have the recently rebuilt MAF in place or the old (not known to be bad) MAF in place.

Based on what you are saying it seems that the LH is not properly adjusting fuel when it knows how much air is passing through the MAF, but when it doesn't know, it presumably uses defaults that work.
Old 07-13-2008, 02:18 PM
  #68  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by astvic
I had the "not running on all cylinders" issue.
Everything is fine today

My conclusion was the COILS and IGNITION MODULES (also mentioned earlier).
With new coils the car suddenly changed dramaticly.
Much more power in the ignition !!!! totally new engine expirence.
Try to change them with some new once. If they only perform let's say 50% (you can only measure there performance only if they are electrically intact or not) then there wouldn't be enough "power" to ignit. (just my therory)
After that I changed the ignition modules. The bad coil can and will damage the ignition modules (from what I have heard).
My coils was the original onces (18 years old) .

Just an input.
Don't forget to exercise the spark plug connectors !!!!!!!!!!!
All mine looked good and also measured correct (3 ohm), but when I took under specail care, two of them broked. Just as easy as a boiled sausage. Afterward I could see that they actually was broken. Only 15% of the plastic in the 90 degree angle was intact. (if you now what I mean)
Why would disconnecting the MAF mask such a problem? While I know new parts can go bad, all the wires are new. Also, since I checked the plugs and found them all to be similar, and good, it would seem they are all working equally.
Old 07-13-2008, 02:33 PM
  #69  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
I would think a bad injector would be constant, right? When I disconnect the MAF, the car idles as good as it ever has. This is true whether I have the recently rebuilt MAF in place or the old (not known to be bad) MAF in place.

Based on what you are saying it seems that the LH is not properly adjusting fuel when it knows how much air is passing through the MAF, but when it doesn't know, it presumably uses defaults that work.
Hi Stan,
Yes you are correct.

Sometimes LH can fail so they think the WOT switch is always operated, resulting in over fuelling tec.

Can you swap in another LH ?
Old 07-13-2008, 02:39 PM
  #70  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Hi Stan,
Yes you are correct.

Sometimes LH can fail so they think the WOT switch is always operated, resulting in over fuelling tec.

Can you swap in another LH ?
Thank you for the thought

No, I don't have another LH. I might be able to convince a neighbor to loan me one. I don't know how quickly an LH goes bad, but mine was tested just a few months ago and was fine then.
Old 07-13-2008, 03:26 PM
  #71  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Sometimes LH can fail so they think the WOT switch is always operated, resulting in over fuelling tec.
If it were over fueling, would this possibly lead to a fault being detected by the ignition circuit relay?
Old 07-13-2008, 03:42 PM
  #72  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
If it were over fueling, would this possibly lead to a fault being detected by the ignition circuit relay?
No, as the over fuelling would be the same for all cylinders, so exhaust temps would be equal, and the igntion protection circuit would not be triggered.
Old 07-13-2008, 03:55 PM
  #73  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
No, as the over fuelling would be the same for all cylinders, so exhaust temps would be equal, and the igntion protection circuit would not be triggered.
Ok, thanks. Perhaps with the MAF disconnect the EGTs aren;t monitored then. So if one is bad, the disconnected MAF would prevent the erroneous EGT from being reported.... Not sure, but I will try disconnected them next and then reconnecting the MAF.

I just hope I remember this stuff in the future
Old 07-13-2008, 05:20 PM
  #74  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,433
Received 1,605 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
No, as the over fuelling would be the same for all cylinders, so exhaust temps would be equal, and the igntion protection circuit would not be triggered.
I disagree John. I think that if the over-fueling is massive the lower combustion a/f limit can be reached periodically in one or more cylinders. The mixture is too rich to ignite properly. Even under perfect 'factory' conditions the cylinders will not get exactly the same amount of fuel.

I base my opinion on direct observation, troubleshooting, and repair of a 90GT a few weeks ago. The o2 sensor and MAF were both bad. The motor was running so rich that the protection circuit triggered. The obvious explanation is that the over-rich condition coupled with other uncharacterized non-optimum conditions (such as perhaps bad spray pattern on one or more injectors) quenched one or more cylinders sufficiently to cause a temperature differential between the EGTs.
Old 07-13-2008, 06:54 PM
  #75  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
I disagree John. I think that if the over-fueling is massive the lower combustion a/f limit can be reached periodically in one or more cylinders. The mixture is too rich to ignite properly. Even under perfect 'factory' conditions the cylinders will not get exactly the same amount of fuel.

I base my opinion on direct observation, troubleshooting, and repair of a 90GT a few weeks ago. The o2 sensor and MAF were both bad. The motor was running so rich that the protection circuit triggered. The obvious explanation is that the over-rich condition coupled with other uncharacterized non-optimum conditions (such as perhaps bad spray pattern on one or more injectors) quenched one or more cylinders sufficiently to cause a temperature differential between the EGTs.


Rich A/F enough to have visible black exhaust emissions?
Saw that at SITM with the sick Texas 928 spewing black smoke from running way rich.


Quick Reply: 90 GT suddenly running very rough



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:10 PM.