Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

** Update ** Here's Are The Offsets ! - 11 inch Rim

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2008, 06:25 PM
  #61  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

yea actually. it only takes 1 mm to make a rubbing noise. if it was a 5mm too far out then it wouldn't rub, it would crash and deform the fender. So yeah 3mm can make a huge difference. The difference between fitting and rubbing.

EDIT: I just checked Ebay for you and Vertex isnt selling their spacers on there. There are 15mm spacers but they are the type that requires longer bolts and you dont want those. I would buy the Vertex spacers and be done with it. Where are you anyway? are you in the States or in Euroland?
Old 04-09-2008, 06:38 PM
  #62  
Nadine
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Nadine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm in Scotland.....

BTW, where do I buy a Single Shank Nut Spanner 08-029 to adjust the height ? My Norton C Spanner doesn't fit properly.

Cheers

Nadine

Last edited by Nadine; 04-09-2008 at 07:37 PM.
Old 04-10-2008, 12:37 PM
  #63  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BRETT AINLEY
Hi NADINE

Thats the same calculator that SAID that 245/45/18 would fit on front of mine with a 7.5 out..

TAKE MY WORD THEY DIDNT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They jammed on rear of front arch...

I am not sure who wrote that calculator, but for me at least it DIDNT work properly....

All the best Brett
All-

I wrote the calculator.

Sorry I didn't respond earlier - had issues getting on r'list the last few days. As the calculator states, you need to do your own research. I'm going to modify the calculator to show that anything less than a 50mm offset may not work! becasue obviously the warning about it sticking beyond the fenders is not enough.
Old 04-10-2008, 02:49 PM
  #64  
Brett928S2
Three Wheelin'
 
Brett928S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
All-

I wrote the calculator.

Sorry I didn't respond earlier - had issues getting on r'list the last few days. As the calculator states, you need to do your own research. I'm going to modify the calculator to show that anything less than a 50mm offset may not work! becasue obviously the warning about it sticking beyond the fenders is not enough.
Hi Andrew

I would not have minded the sticking out bit lol...it was the couldn't turn the steering wheel even an inch when the tyres were sticking on lower part of rear bottom part of arch I didn't like lol...

Maybe it was down to make of tyres (Falkens) as obviously some have different shapes than others...

But for your calculator...on 7.5 fronts with a 50 offset,

A 225/40/18 WILL fit

A 245/40/18 WILL NOT fit

A 235/40/18 MAY fit (didn't try that size)

Hope this helps

All the best Brett
Old 04-10-2008, 03:08 PM
  #65  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Yep... the more data points... the better off we are.
Old 04-10-2008, 03:28 PM
  #66  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The problem with the calculator is that it does nothing with the tire profile size. For example, it will say a 225/40-18 will fit, and that a 225/70-18 will also fit (which definitely would not, if such a size existed). For it to work properly it would need to use the profile size to calculate the total diameter of the wheel/tire combo, then use that value in the calculation along with offset and tire width to deterime whether it would fit or not.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
Old 04-10-2008, 03:36 PM
  #67  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think the calculator is great as is and thank Andrew for taking the time to put it together. It helped me out.

IT WORKS, NO NEED TO CHANGE IT

225 70 18, come on?
Old 04-10-2008, 03:41 PM
  #68  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
I think the calculator is great as is and thank Andrew for taking the time to put it together. It helped me out.

IT WORKS, NO NEED TO CHANGE IT

225 70 18, come on?
Ok, fine, how about 245/45-18 with ET52? I'm not saying the calculator is bad, I've also used it. I'm just saying it can be improved to be even better. Why would you say it doesn't need to be changed when there are cases where it has provided misinformation? Every great invention goes through at least several iterations.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
Old 04-10-2008, 04:11 PM
  #69  
Dennis K
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dennis K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BRETT AINLEY

A 245/40/18 WILL NOT fit

:
Originally Posted by BRETT AINLEY
Hi NADINE

Thats the same calculator that SAID that 245/45/18 would fit on front of mine with a 7.5 out..

TAKE MY WORD THEY DIDNT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Brett - Which tire did you use, 245/40/18 or 245/45/18? If it was the second, the larger diameter could have been the problem.

Andrew - As a data point, I've used 245/40/18 on an 8.5x18 w/ 52 mm offset but the fender was heavily rolled. It still rubbed the fender during U-turns. Not recommended for a street setup.
Old 04-10-2008, 04:14 PM
  #70  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

well 52mm offset is pretty far out. Mine at 57m is about as far as i would want to go, another 5mm and it would look like crap.

Does Andrews calculator say that a 57mm fits and a 52mm does not? If so then yes the calculator is correct, if not then yeah it should be modified. I used it for rear fitment, fronts seem to be less of an issue.
Old 04-10-2008, 04:30 PM
  #71  
Brett928S2
Three Wheelin'
 
Brett928S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis K
Brett - Which tire did you use, 245/40/18 or 245/45/18? If it was the second, the larger diameter could have been the problem.

Andrew - As a data point, I've used 245/40/18 on an 8.5x18 w/ 52 mm offset but the fender was heavily rolled. It still rubbed the fender during U-turns. Not recommended for a street setup.

Hi Dennis

Ok, good point..have now rechecked wheels/tyres and paperwork...

First wheels are 7.5 x 18 with a 50 offset...(50 offset also means centre caps WILL NOT fit over bearing caps)

TRIED 245/45/18.....DO NOT FIT (Couldn't move steering wheel more than an inch before wheels/tyres LOCKED on bottom of front arch at rear)

235/45/18 didnt try but doubt they will fit without rubbing

225/40/18 DID fit (with very slight rubbing on inside on full lock)..my answer ...dont use full lock lol

My problem may well be that 7.5 is not allowing the tyres to spread enough so they make too much height...

All the best Brett
Old 04-10-2008, 04:50 PM
  #72  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

45 aspect ration on an 18" wheel is HUGE~

17" has a 45 aspect ration, go up an inch in rim size, go down 5 in aspect ratio, thats always worked for me.
Old 04-10-2008, 04:51 PM
  #73  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
well 52mm offset is pretty far out. Mine at 57m is about as far as i would want to go, another 5mm and it would look like crap.

Does Andrews calculator say that a 57mm fits and a 52mm does not? If so then yes the calculator is correct, if not then yeah it should be modified. I used it for rear fitment, fronts seem to be less of an issue.
I don't think you are understanding this correctly. As the profile of a tire increases, so does the overall diameter. You can only increase the diameter so much until the wheel/tire will no longer fit. It's not just the offset I'm talking about. A good example of a tire that many want to fit is 235/40-18. The calculator makes no distinction between a 235/40-18 and a 235/35-18 tire, when, in fact, there is a real difference between the two in terms of diameter. When you are looking to run tires that come very close to the max. dimensions of the wheel well, the diameter becomes an important value. Brett was one who was caught by this as the calculator said a 245/45-18 tire would fit, but in fact it did not because the width in conjunction with the wheel ET *and* diameter of the wheel (due to the 45 profile) caused it to rub during turns.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
Old 04-10-2008, 04:54 PM
  #74  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
I don't think you are understanding this correctly. As the profile of a tire increases, so does the overall diameter. You can only increase the diameter so much until the wheel/tire will no longer fit. It's not just the offset I'm talking about. A good example of a tire that many want to fit is 235/40-18. The calculator makes no distinction between a 235/40-18 and a 235/45-18 tire, when, in fact, there is a real difference between the two in terms of diameter. When you are looking to run tires that come very close to the max. dimensions of the wheel well, the diameter becomes an important value. Brett was one who was caught by this as the calculator said a 245/45-18 tire would fit, but in fact it did not because the width in conjunction with the wheel ET *and* diameter of the wheel (due to the 45 profile) caused it to rub during turns.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
I'm well aware of aspect ratio and tire width and rim size, see post above.

I wouldnt be surprised if that value was not taken into account in Andrews calculator. I still dont get why you would put a 2xx 45 18 on a 928 though. Thats a huge tire!
Old 04-10-2008, 04:58 PM
  #75  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
45 aspect ration on an 18" wheel is HUGE~

17" has a 45 aspect ration, go up an inch in rim size, go down 5 in aspect ratio, thats always worked for me.
Really? What about a 45 aspect ratio on a stock 16x8 wheel with a 245? Or a 50 aspect ratio on a stock 16x7 wheel with a 225?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C


Quick Reply: ** Update ** Here's Are The Offsets ! - 11 inch Rim



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:09 PM.