Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists
View Poll Results: Would you swap out a 2.73 R/P transmission for a 2.2 R/P one on a >400rwhp 928?
Yes, I think it would be worth it and the lower gears would suit the additional power better
57.14%
No, I don't think it would be worth it, plus it would inevitably make the car *seem* slower
42.86%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Question for the >400rwhp club

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2008, 04:12 PM
  #1  
dprantl
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Question for the >400rwhp club

If you have a supercharged 928 with a 5-speed 2.73 rear pinion transmission, do you think it would be worth it to swap the transmission out for one with a 2.2 5-speed?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
'86 928S 5-spd w/LSD *sale pending*
Old 03-03-2008, 04:19 PM
  #2  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

I'm planning on swapping the 2.73 for a 2.20 transmission in my 81. With the extra power the 2.73 is not needed.

Problem is, with your GT you have one of the best transmissions you get get for a 928. I wouldn't swap that out for a 2.20 box just because the GT box is stronger.
Old 03-03-2008, 05:10 PM
  #3  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Just bump up the rev limiter!

Edit: My assumption is that you want to do this for higher topend...
Old 03-03-2008, 05:11 PM
  #4  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Just bump up the rev limiter!
I heard a rumor these engines can be revved up to 9,750rpm
Old 03-03-2008, 05:11 PM
  #5  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the answer would depend on how much over 400rwhp you're talking about. Is it 401rwhp, or 600+rwhp?
Old 03-03-2008, 05:13 PM
  #6  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Z's got a point... even if it is blunt.
Old 03-03-2008, 05:14 PM
  #7  
89 928 turbo
Instructor
 
89 928 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

........and 0-60 in the quarter's?
Old 03-03-2008, 05:30 PM
  #8  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

This goes back to many discussions, but gearing doesnt make HP and acceleration is proportional to power at any given speed.

Acceleration = Power/(mass x velocity)

There are trade offs through the gears , so it really depends on the target speed range that you will be driving the car in. on the race track, you would choose a gear box that would put you at close to redline for the majority of the straights, before the turns. on a drag strip, depending on traction limitations, there will be some slight gains, even if the final speed is not optimized for the final gear ( ie, 2.2 vs 2.75) the big variable there is traction. in that comparison, if you cant take advantage of the lower 1st gear, then there might be situations where you could be slower.

For example. I did some tests in my first gear, where i have 300+ rwhp. at near max torque or 4000rpm, there is no way that i can keep the wheels from spinning on the street with warm 305x18s race rubber. even if i floor it from a rolling 2000rpm, when it gets to near max torque, it spins the tires. This means that there is a limitation of grip that wont be helped by any additional HP. better traction, launch control, etc will be the most dominant factors. the rest of the gears will have grip and the overall acceleration will be a blend of the HP available in all the gears up to the target speed.

Again, when Anderson changed from 2.2 to 2.72, he didnt see a drop in lap times. IN fact, he is just starting to be about .5 seconds faster than he has been over the past 10 years, with the 2.73, but im sure that 80 more hp hasnt hurt that improvement!

the answer is no. the main reason to use the 2.72 would be for the stronger gears as was mentioned. both the GT and the GTS are stronger gear boxes, and thats why i would do it. I would also do it with 400rwhp, because the tracks i visit are perfect for the 2.2 gear speed ranges. that changes when you get more more HP.

Lots of factors

mk



Originally Posted by 89 928 turbo
........and 0-60 in the quarter's?
Old 03-03-2008, 05:36 PM
  #9  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
the answer is no. the main reason to use the 2.72 would be for the stronger gears as was mentioned. both the GT and the GTS are stronger gear boxes, and thats why i would do it.
This is just a small detail (since I'm not sure how may 16V's have over 400rwhp) the early transmissions are not very strong, and come with the 2.73 (or 2.75) rear end.

This is another big reason why I'm chaning boxes. The 85+ 2.20 is a stronger box than the early ones and 1st gear is useless on my car.
Old 03-03-2008, 05:38 PM
  #10  
dprantl
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z
I think the answer would depend on how much over 400rwhp you're talking about. Is it 401rwhp, or 600+rwhp?
I'd say around 430 - 450. I was also thinking about the 15% better gas mileage while cruising on the highway with the 2.2...

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
'86 928S 5-spd w/LSD *sale pending*
Old 03-03-2008, 05:43 PM
  #11  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
I'd say around 430 - 450. I was also thinking about the 15% better gas mileage while cruising on the highway with the 2.2...

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
'86 928S 5-spd w/LSD *sale pending*
Are you really worried about gas mileage?
Old 03-03-2008, 05:44 PM
  #12  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Gas mileage is the wrong metric to be concerned about IMHO.
Old 03-03-2008, 05:49 PM
  #13  
dprantl
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Are you really worried about gas mileage?
Well I use my car as a daily driver. Sometimes I do not worry about gas mileage and drive her hard. Other times if I'm going 400 miles one way, it's nice to be able to get 24 - 25mpg. I'm not saying it's a big factor, just something to throw in to the discussion. Is it wrong to want a car that can "do it all"?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
'86 928S 5-spd w/LSD *sale pending*
Old 03-03-2008, 05:58 PM
  #14  
89 928 turbo
Instructor
 
89 928 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



I know that when I went to larger injectors (30#) that my car told me my instant mileage was over 33mpg....

I think she was just trying to make me feel better about myself...

jt
Old 03-03-2008, 06:32 PM
  #15  
dprantl
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89 928 turbo


I know that when I went to larger injectors (30#) that my car told me my instant mileage was over 33mpg....

I think she was just trying to make me feel better about myself...

jt
Hmm, that's strange. My GT has 30# injectors and the gas mileage display is still very accurate (~20-22mpg on highway cruise @ 75mph). I thought that this was just based on manifold vacuum/pressure. Is that not the case?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C
'86 928S 5-spd w/LSD *sale pending*


Quick Reply: Question for the >400rwhp club



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:58 PM.