Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Exhaust, singel or dual, what´s best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2008, 09:52 PM
  #16  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doktor-t
My -86 with 32v engine has the same exhaust as the S4, ie dual 2,1/4" tubing. I found out that the stock exhaust was dead heavy and not an ideal thing for a sportscar.

I´m about to build a new exhaust for the car but cannot decide what way to go.

1# Dual 2,5" with X-pipe.
Pro: Good flow
Con: Not very lightweight

2# Dual 2,5" forming an Y-pipe and mate into a single 3" tubing.
Pro: Lightweight
Con: What about exhaustflow, is it enought?

3# Dual 2,5" forming an Y-pipe and mate into a singel 3,5" tubing.

Pro: Flow must be good
Con: ...


What would you choose? Pros and cons?


/Tobias, Sweden
Number 1. The single 3" is about 2.875" ID and it doesn't have as much area as your stock dual pipe system. Yes, the duals weigh more and will be more expensive, but the weight savings of the single cost more torque than the savings in weight gain in performance. A single 3.5" is difficult to muffle adequately and it seems to flow too well and costs mid range torque as compared to the dual 2.5" (2.375" ID).

Check the dyno charts in the link provided by Rick Carter. That tells the story.
Old 02-03-2008, 09:58 PM
  #17  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Louie928
A single 3.5" is difficult to muffle adequately and it seems to flow too well and costs mid range torque as compared to the dual 2.5" (2.375" ID).
Thanks Louie. Thats what I was looking for - the comment you have made here. "Difficult to muffle inadequately, means too loud to me. Is that what you mean?
Old 02-03-2008, 10:09 PM
  #18  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Thanks Louie. Thats what I was looking for - the comment you have made here. "Difficult to muffle inadequately, means too loud to me. Is that what you mean?
Hi Brendan,
That's what I meant. Check the offerings of the 3.5" mufflers and then see where they will fit. One muffler won't be adequate. You can put one behind the Y and in front of the transmission. It's really hard to put a 3.5" muffler beside the tranny unless it's quite short. The inlet angle there makes things really tight with the big tubing. You can put another muffler in the rear.
Old 02-03-2008, 10:28 PM
  #19  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doktor-t
So, either I choose dual 2,5" with an X or dual 2,5" merging into a singel 3,5" since it seems better with 3,5" than 3".

What about groundclerance when using 3,5" pipes? Any pics of a 3,5"?

/Tobias
If you prefer the torque loss of the single 3.5" system, I'd suggest using a "Y" merge collector right up front with the 2.5" inlets of the "Y" connected right to the exhaust manifolds. I have seen an X pipe with 2.5" outlets connected to a "Y" merge going into a single 3.5" or 3". That just complicates things.

When I did these exhaust tests I had an X pipe with nothing behind it. I had a good "Y" merge pipe (one Tom Cloutier made) with nothing behind that. There was no noticeable difference between them. The dual 2.5" X pipe, and the "Y" merge (two 2.5" inlets and merging into a 3.5" outlet was the same. Next step was to connect an exhaust system to go out the rear. Adding the dual 2.5" pipes with 2.5" straight through Bullet brand mufflers showed a torque increase from below 3000 to about 4500 rpm as compared to no rear exhaust. Top end was the same. Next was to put on a 3.5" rear exhaust connected to the "Y" merge and try that. The 3.5" rear exhaust showed no change from having no rear exhaust at all. That is less torque from 3000 to 4500 than the X pipe with 2.5" duals. True, it isn't much of a difference, but a series of small improvemente adds up.
Old 02-03-2008, 11:45 PM
  #20  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
That's why I run a 4" exhaust
John
Exactly what I was looking for!!!! So a single 3.5 flows about the same as a dual 2.5.....so a single 4 flows about the same as a dual 3" I guess......that should be enough!!!
Old 02-03-2008, 11:48 PM
  #21  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

My thoughts on exhausts kinda work like this.....for a race shark.....where noise isn't as much of a concern....i would go with a 3.5" single system for a stockish motor...bumped to 4" for a stroker

On a street 928.....dual 2.5" is plenty for stockish motors....dual 3" for S/C-strokers....
Old 02-03-2008, 11:58 PM
  #22  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Am expecting delivery of rest of parts this week to try 2.25 dual on a 16V.
No science. So I can say I have duals.

Seems like there are real advantages for single, though.
Old 02-04-2008, 12:01 AM
  #23  
FBIII
Three Wheelin'
 
FBIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On a euro S with MSDS headers having a 3 inch collector could you run 3" into 3" cats into a y pipe and then 3.5 after the Y? My thinking was to run as large a cat as possible to minimize its affect and to also add a small amount of muffling.
Old 02-04-2008, 07:17 AM
  #24  
doktor-t
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
doktor-t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Okey guys, I´m convinced. I will go with the dual 2,5" with an X to be on the safe side so to speak. I´ll try to use one dual muffler at the rear to get the tones down but still retain a good roar

Thanks for your inputs and opinions.

/Tobias, Sweden
Old 02-23-2008, 02:10 PM
  #25  
LostInSpace
Rennlist Member
 
LostInSpace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK - Ex NZ
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've been thinking about a dual 2.5 system as well and was wondering how the 2.5 inch tubes mate up to the exhaust manifold, i.e. what is the internal diameter of the manifold?
Old 02-23-2008, 07:00 PM
  #26  
largecar379
Three Wheelin'
 
largecar379's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: not where you think I am
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I prefer my set-up, but would have gone to this if not for the sidepipes:

headers into crossover

crossover into 3 inch pipe (duals)

CATs if required (duals,3 inch in/3 inch out)

Flowmaster mufflers (duals, 3 inch in/3 inch out)

twin 3 inch pipes out the rear

for a street car you should not really need to worry about the weight, but if for a race car--who needs CATs and mufflers?


--Russ

Last edited by largecar379; 12-14-2008 at 02:26 AM.
Old 02-23-2008, 07:04 PM
  #27  
Drewster67
Nordschleife Master
 
Drewster67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

MSDS headers into straight pipes that merge into 1 3" pipe that have a 2 chamber 40 series flowmaster at the end.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uTI6-YV-fCU



Quick Reply: Exhaust, singel or dual, what´s best?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:04 AM.