Stroker
01-22-2003, 03:35 AM
#31
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NorCal928
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Curt,
I'm just referring to the difference in the hp/tq curves that are associated with S4, GT and GTS cam profiles. Wider/broader curves with S4 or GTS, but lower in the RPM range (v. GT cams), hence the relationship to driving style/requirements.
I'm just referring to the difference in the hp/tq curves that are associated with S4, GT and GTS cam profiles. Wider/broader curves with S4 or GTS, but lower in the RPM range (v. GT cams), hence the relationship to driving style/requirements.
01-22-2003, 05:34 PM
#32
Racer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by marc@DEVEK:
<strong>The only 440 rwhp stroker was built by me using gt cams....and it is a very specially detailed out engine running pump gas!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">I can't vouch for the engine's output, but it is Devek-built. Perhaps there was some misunderstanding.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva"><strong>The 86 is an automatic, no headers or exhaust, no intake mods...just plain brute power with a pwoer curve that does not quit!
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Ahh, thanks. Much better to know specific details (than conjecture). Make it a 5-speed with headers and exhaust, and I suppose it would be a lot closer to what I had expected.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva"><strong>Everyone think that peak hp is the big deal....it is not, it always about area under the curve!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">And where the sweet spot is, depending on your intended use. Thanks for the info, Marc.
<strong>The only 440 rwhp stroker was built by me using gt cams....and it is a very specially detailed out engine running pump gas!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">I can't vouch for the engine's output, but it is Devek-built. Perhaps there was some misunderstanding.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva"><strong>The 86 is an automatic, no headers or exhaust, no intake mods...just plain brute power with a pwoer curve that does not quit!
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Ahh, thanks. Much better to know specific details (than conjecture). Make it a 5-speed with headers and exhaust, and I suppose it would be a lot closer to what I had expected.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva"><strong>Everyone think that peak hp is the big deal....it is not, it always about area under the curve!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">And where the sweet spot is, depending on your intended use. Thanks for the info, Marc.