Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

No flexplate movement w/rear AT cooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2007, 01:31 AM
  #16  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I know very little about the guts of a slushbox, and I haven't looked at them in the WSM as Gregg suggested. This may be a little out there but here's a theory:

What if it's not the parts in the tranny that are expanding but the tranny case itself? Case expands and pulls all the guts backwards. Flexplate clamp then shifts due to the rearward pulling combined with heat/shaft-twist/vibration. When the car cools the case goes back to normal size but there is no longer a source of heat/twist/vibration to move the flexplate clamp, so the flexplate is pushed forward. Ken's cooler would've reduced heat, possibly reducing tranny case expansion.
Old 05-28-2007, 08:39 PM
  #17  
Steve Cattaneo
Three Wheelin'
 
Steve Cattaneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hudson Valley NY
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
The converters are enclosed in their own housing. They could balloon until they pushed the transmission oil pump through the back of the transmission and they would not effect the torque tube or the front flex plate....the cast aluminum housing that the converter is enclosed in would crack and break if the converter pushed more than a couple of millimeters. Take a look at the workshop manual and see how all of these pieces are assembled and you will see what I'm talking about. The aluminum housings are never damaged, nor have I ever seen a converter that had any signs of ballooning. This is not the cause of the problem.

Since Porsche clearly recognized the problem on the early cars and made a positive stop for the flexplate, the problem has to be either "creep" or from the twisting of the torque tube shaft from torque. Since the GTS vehicles suffered more from this problem than the earlier models, we have always assumed that the problem had a direct relationship to torque. Guess the supercharger guys might be able to answer this.

I can't even begin to imagine what transmission temperature would have to do with this problem....perhaps you could share your insight/thoughts on this.

greg brown



Torque converter ballooning is real, and its affect is will know in the automotive industry. You haven’t seen it because you don’t know what to look for; you’re looking for a major failure. Front pump seal leaks and pump failure is the result of Newton's Third Law of Motion.


Torque converter ballooning and TC flange bearing wear movement as shown in Borland excellent animation, can easily push the engine crank against its thrust bearing, we are talking about a couple of thousands, not inches.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
Overrevving.pdf (24.3 KB, 134 views)
Old 05-28-2007, 08:47 PM
  #18  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,781
Received 150 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

I think this is finally beginning to make sense...

I assume that in order to replace the torque converter bearings, the transmission has to come out - correct? If I remember correctly, it's about 8 hours for the removal and replacement of the transmission, plus the labor for whatever else needs to be done. That can add up to a pretty significant bill many are not willing to pay. Does anybody have a rough estimate on the cost of replacing those bearings?
Old 05-28-2007, 08:56 PM
  #19  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Nicole:

Ideally the tranny should come out, but we removed the TC and replaced the bearing in Matt's 91 S4 without removing the tranny. As soon as my TT decides it's gone far enough and starts groaning and moaning I will be pulling it and the TC out with the tranny left in the car. The bearing is a small part of the job. Stan recommends front pump seal replacement too WYAIT.
Old 05-28-2007, 09:20 PM
  #20  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,154
Received 393 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Nicole - Are you factoring the price at Bill's shop rate?

My only trouble with the TC ballooning is that the engine flexplate moves toward the engine. One crazy theory I had was that maybe since the TC flexplate is attached at it's periphery, if the TC englarges, the TC flexplate is bowed rearwards, towards the TC, which would pull on the driveshaft?
Old 05-28-2007, 09:39 PM
  #21  
Steve Cattaneo
Three Wheelin'
 
Steve Cattaneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hudson Valley NY
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nicole,
Can you do me a big favor; there is a euro, (VW, BMW. Audi and MB) ECU Turning Company in Germany that I want to be their NY Dealer. Their web site is writing in German, no English translation. Can you send them an E - Mail on my behalf

Drive to NY I will change them for you.
Old 05-29-2007, 12:20 AM
  #22  
daveo90s4
Pro
 
daveo90s4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 686
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Since the flexplate is pushed forwards, the central shaft must be being gradually pulled rearwards out of the clamp, right? Is rearward pull on the central shaft a force that would be caused by 'ballooning'?. If yes, then could be a candidate explanation, but not necessarily THE explanation. If no, then cannot be the explanation. Does this sound right to you folks who know about auto transmissions?
Old 05-29-2007, 01:05 AM
  #23  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,781
Received 150 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

So, if I understand this correctly, you can either remove the transmission OR the torque tube to do this job. When I got my car I had the transmission removed to replace the leaking torque converter seal (at 63k miles). I wish I would have known this then...

But it sounds like something that should be combined with a rebuild torque tube - no?

Originally Posted by Steve Cattaneo
Drive to NY I will change them for you.
Don't say such things - I love to travel, and sometimes just need an excuse...
Old 05-29-2007, 01:24 AM
  #24  
Schocki
Rennlist Member
 
Schocki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Madrid, España
Posts: 2,174
Received 189 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Nicole,
You have to take the tranny out. Torque tube removal is only possible on 5-speed manual cars. There is not enough room...
Old 05-29-2007, 01:38 AM
  #25  
majhopper
Instructor
 
majhopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My own pet theory is that relieving TT pressure under certain circumstances can exacerbate the problem. ie - car on wheels vs car on lift.

I liked Constantines fix, but it almost seems too fixed. The Flex plate seems to be a Suck plate...
Old 05-29-2007, 01:39 AM
  #26  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schocki
Nicole,
You have to take the tranny out. Torque tube removal is only possible on 5-speed manual cars. There is not enough room...
Schocki: We did it on a 91 S4. The trick is sliding the tranny back and dropping the bellhousing. Then it takes some gymastics to get the upper rear TT bolts off and the TC cover off, but we managed. Figure about an hour more than a 5-speed TT.
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...highlight=tube
(pictures in post 23)

It's the same technique I used to replace the rear main seal on my 89 with tranny inplace.
http://www.billsworkshop.com/P928S4/seal/seal.htm
Old 05-29-2007, 01:49 AM
  #27  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by majhopper
My own pet theory is that relieving TT pressure under certain circumstances can exacerbate the problem. ie - car on wheels vs car on lift.
What difference does the lift make?
Old 05-29-2007, 03:25 AM
  #28  
majhopper
Instructor
 
majhopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
What difference does the lift make?
I don't know. But I do know that the WSMs call for removal of X-Member in many non-intuitive circumstances. We know the engine is not "balanced" cold, as per the .4mm advance on the pass side to compensate for unequal heat driven structural changes. Head on forces in an unbalnced system become lateral forces - and vice versa.
Old 05-29-2007, 10:09 AM
  #29  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When we started looking into this whole affair, torque converter (TC) ballooning was looked into as a possible cause for the drive shaft causing a forward push against the front flexplate. What we found was the forward push does cause some wear on the TC housing bearings, not due to being pushed forward by a ballooning TC, but due to the tension of the forward push against the front flexplate and the subsequent backward push agianst the TC housing bearings.

I can understand the TC bearings wearing and causing some problems with the operation of the driveshaft. However, the bearing wear/TC ballooning does not seem to be the major cause of most of the incidences of forward thrust on the front flexplate. When one releases the forward pressure by un-clamping the front clamp and letting the flexplate glide back onto the driveshaft, the forward thrust comes back after a time, at about the same 3-4 mm load.

The theory this is being caused by a ballooning TC would mean the TC is still ballooning and still pushing the driveshaft forward at the same rate and the drive shaft will keep this up with each subsequent release until the driveshaft is moved way forward, the rear flexplate is hitting and machining itself into the TC housing, the transmission is not operating correctly and metal shavings are appearing from the TC housing opening.

Yes TCs are known to balloon and cause many problems. However, TC ballooning is not known to occur with the frequency that forward flexplate movement has been found in the auto 928.

As Borland has recommended, changing the TC housing bearings is a good idea when the trans is out of the car, as is replacing the TT bearings and the trans front pump seal.

Constantine
Old 05-29-2007, 10:56 AM
  #30  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I bet you don't have a 1995 Boxster
Originally Posted by majhopper
__________________
1977 911SC 3.0L Euro - The Whale
1995 986 - The Baby Shark
1986.5 928S - The Shark
1986.5 928S - The Parts Bin
2001 Volvo V70 - The Problem
1999 Toyota Landcruiser - The Wife's

Just because we have chiseled abs...
and stunning features...
it doesn't mean that we can't die
in a freak gasoline fight accident.
---Derek Zoolander


Quick Reply: No flexplate movement w/rear AT cooler



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:29 AM.