Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 body how strong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2007, 03:14 PM
  #16  
JHowell37
Drifting
 
JHowell37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Davidsonville, MD
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

From one of the the few people who has actually cut a 928 shell into about 8 pieces I'll tell you that I was quite impressed with just how over the top the designers went with these things. The little divits made by the spot welders are less then a 1/4 inch but required a 3/8 inch drill bit or larger to completely drill out the spot welds. There are thousands of them throughout the car. Many of the body seams after being spot welded have some sort of structural adhesive/seam sealer applied. Cut out a complete cross-section of a rocker panel and you will find 3 layers of steel and in some places, 4 layers. Currently, my car has a quarter panel removed and a cross-section of the rocker panel removed. It's sitting on the ground with no special braces or anything and the doors open and close just fine. In other words, you can remove a lot of structural support, but because each part is made so well, they have some ability to compensate for parts that are compromised.

In addition to the countless spot welds, multiple layers of heavy gauge steel, and structural glue/seam sealer, all of that stuff they spray in the car for sound deadening adds yet another layer of material providing structural rigidity.

Honestly though, one doesn't need to chop up a car to realize how tough it is. Just pay attention when you get in it. It feels like you're sitting down in a chair that's been bolted to a concrete slab. Can your Honda Accord give you that feeling?

I was flipping through my 911 Buyer's Guide from Motorbooks, and it mentioned the structural rigidity of the 911. It basically stated that Porsche advised body shops to replace the front subframe if it was bent in a collision because it was so strong that it was next to impossible to properly straighten.
Old 05-09-2007, 03:28 PM
  #17  
JHowell37
Drifting
 
JHowell37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Davidsonville, MD
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peter F
I agree that the 928 is strong compared to many other cars.
Still curious how it compares to other sports cars though.
I seem to remember seing something on this but could not find anything searching the forum.
There is the crossmember in the engine compartment so it seems to need extra structure side to side up front.
Rear is probably stronger side to side since no one has developed a crossmember to be used there.

/Peter
Well obviously newer sports cars will probably surpass the 928 in structural rigidity based on the evolution of engineering and technology. If you look at how the car is designed the majority of the structure runs from front to back, not side to side. There is no cross bar in the rear because the floor from the firewall back is a structural member that holds the two sides of the car together. The area forward of the jack pads is a subframe which needs extra support since it carries the weight of the engine and everything else that's crammed under the hood.
Old 05-09-2007, 04:12 PM
  #18  
rhys
Instructor
 
rhys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ, Czech Republic, Russia
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
In fact the 928's are made from recycled uranium from old Soviet missiles. You can crash them into a steel wall at 170MPH and not even have a scratch (you or the car), but the wall will be nowhere to be found. Sharks are completely invincible.
I tried that, and as soon as I get out of this full-body cast, I plan to write a review of the out-of-body, near-death experience.
Old 05-09-2007, 04:15 PM
  #19  
rhys
Instructor
 
rhys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ, Czech Republic, Russia
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
The body has its strong sections and its softer sections. The regular steel in the fenders (rear) and the fire wall seem very soft to me, and a bit less stiff than today's cars, but the rails, and the boxy areas that run from front to rear seem very strong, stronger then the boxed rails in my modern cars.
I believe a better term for what the OP was asking would be "rigid", or "torsional rigidity" rather than "strong"
Old 05-09-2007, 05:35 PM
  #20  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,496
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,069 Posts
Default

I drag out this old quote from around 1990 whenever this subject comes up:

Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
A fifteen-year-old California boy who stole and crashed a 1987 Porsche 928S, later told an officer, "I had it as fast as it would go, and I wasn't letting off." The officer estimated the car was traveling "about 200 mph" at the time of the accident. When the Porsche left the road, it flew 65 to 75 yards, knocked down a pine tree, sliced neatly through two mature cedar trees -ten feet above the ground- and concluded its flight by leveling a maple tree with an eighteen-inch trunk. Examining the wreckage, a reporter for the Anne Arundel County Sun spotted the nearby remains of a compact-disc player and the Bon Jovi CD "Slippery When Wet", whose last track is "Wild in the Streets."
That is all I need to know
Old 05-09-2007, 05:54 PM
  #21  
DonS
Drifting
 
DonS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Live Music Capital of the World - Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Carter
In Cannonball Run II they tried to crush a 928 with Bigfoot, the monster truck not Sasquatch. IIRC they had to cut the pillars before it would crush.
The way I heard it was they were looking for a car that could land on it's roof without crushing or hurting the occupants and the 928 was the only one they could find that was capable of such a stunt.
Old 05-09-2007, 07:59 PM
  #22  
Jim M.
Rennlist Member
 
Jim M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 5,006
Received 852 Likes on 441 Posts
Default

I lost my 89GT to an accident. To make a long story short, I crashed into a previous accident at about 45 MPH. The front of my car was pushed back to the front of the engine. That's about 18" of Porsche stuff compressed and disintigrated to nothing all against the front of the block and water pump. Well both doors opened and closed normally. The windshield didn't even crack. To me they are VERY strong.

Jim Mayzurk
93 GTS 5-spd
Attached Images  
Old 05-09-2007, 08:02 PM
  #23  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes Jim BUT the door gap is a little off ! The crush zone worked very well which we see all the time with the HUNDREDS of cars we have taken apart.
Old 05-09-2007, 08:51 PM
  #24  
DonS
Drifting
 
DonS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Live Music Capital of the World - Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
Yes Jim BUT the door gap is a little off ! The crush zone worked very well which we see all the time with the HUNDREDS of cars we have taken apart.
Jim, as professional disassemblers where do you guys draw the line as 'non-recoverable'? When the block moved?

Last edited by DonS; 05-09-2007 at 09:42 PM.
Old 05-10-2007, 01:55 AM
  #25  
jpitman2
Rennlist Member
 
jpitman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,283
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I think you are looking for a measure called torsional rigidty, measured in ft/lbs per degree of twist produced, or Nm/degree. Most frequently quoted by makers when they increase the stiffness of a model....dont know it for any specific makes, but it should be findable.
A couple of times when I have had all 4 corners on stands I have found one corner not really sitting on its stand, just being held up by the other 3.
jp 83 Euro S AT 50k.
Old 05-10-2007, 04:13 AM
  #26  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Another way at looking at how strong the 928 frames are is how well they hold up over time-mileage....look at how many 928's are on the road with well over 100K miles and not a single squeek-rattle......that speaks volumes about strength.....I've driven 1 year old cars that squeek-rattle 1000% more than my 928!
Old 05-10-2007, 04:20 AM
  #27  
Peter F
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Peter F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posts: 1,242
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A couple of times when I have had all 4 corners on stands I have found one corner not really sitting on its stand, just being held up by the other 3.
Thia has happend to me as well, I thought it was more due to that the floor was not level.
Either way the car did not settle down after days in the air on the fourth corner.
(had to add a thin pcs of wood to compensate)

/Peter

Last edited by Peter F; 05-10-2007 at 02:48 PM.
Old 05-10-2007, 02:26 PM
  #28  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The front end is the weakest link BY DESIGN in a big shunt the engine gets pushed down under the car. The motor mount ears on the block shear off ,the bell housing breaks and the engine starts going under the car. When we buy a car at a salvage auction it comes with a branded salvage title and maybe 1 out of 100 will get "saved". We are in the parts business and that is what we do best ! We do not fix cars do not service cars we sell parts ! and lots of them If you jack up the car using the front suspension front bracket on the frame and put jack stands under the forward jack points,what you find is that when you release the jack then pump it back up there is some flex as you start to lift from the suspension the body does not come off the jack stands until you raise the jack a bit. Almost nothing in life is "solid"/ rigid there is always some degree of flex. Late model 911s (996/997) hard the ONLY option is to buy a new body shell and transfer ALL the parts because the force of the impact bends the entire chassis ! Porsche engineered the 928 to be stiff enough to do the intended task any stiffer would have needed to be HEAVIER and weight is the enemy ! The A shaped door opening and flying buttress rear panels creates a Very strong roof and I have never seen a roof crushed on a 928 even when someone was creative enough to get one upside down !
Old 05-10-2007, 02:36 PM
  #29  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

IIRR 928 body was designed to withstand three times its own weight while upside down without roof collapsing.



Quick Reply: 928 body how strong?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:46 AM.