AO

Just like I can't find my 11.3 time slip...



Sweet! I'm thinking I might have to go to 42# too. When I was at Murph's this last time, he was doing exactly the same thing (but with the stock FP). The car was pretty happy, but you're gonna need a smaller pulley to take advantage of that extra fuel.

BTW, can you send/post your g-Tech files? I'd like to have a few other cars to compare against -- I think you and I are pretty closely matched.

Imo000

Sorry I tought that the figures from an actual run were sufficient. I have the actuall time slip at home but not at work. Will take a picture and post it later on tonight. The time data from that run is accurate but to prove it, I will post the slip.

Tim Murphy

No, with numbers like that you are not allowed to play in our sandbox... go home

In all seriousness, that is an awesome looking dyno sheet, congratulations! I know you put a ton of effort into making that happen

Here is my best dyno sheet from about 3 years ago. This is from my 5spd car and I really haven't done anything to it since then. Based on the roughness of the curves and the power falling off up stairs you can see I'm having some issues. I'm hoping to get to it within the next month or so. Hopefully with a little tuning I can close some ground on you but those are some pretty lofty numbers.

pmotts

You ain't lying

Ignore the 5th gear pre SC'd run- it was incorrect.

AO

Holy Horsepower Batman! That's huge! With the sharktuner + FMU I would think you can do some pretty cool things there... 600?

So I guess your's is bigger than mine. But what was it that Dan said, you can hit both sides of the tuna can, just not the other end!

PorKen

I liked this correction better, too.

My 130K '86.5 auto with clone chips/mixed chips/stock chips.



SAE correcton takes roughly 10 HP/TQ away at my power levels.

pmotts

Cool Great lines, Hacker.

Louie928

Tim,
If we factor in cubic $ per hp, you are way ahead. Maybe....

pmotts

Looks even better than the pictures

Tim Murphy

I have a shelf in the basement filled with boxes of R&D parts and engine parts.

Mife wife asked me the other day; "what in the heck do you have in all those boxes?" I told her "religion".

hacker-pschorr

Hmm, here I thought those were "open community" parts for the rest of us

Tim Murphy

I thought Dan was looking at you when he said that

600 rwhp is the goal for my 5 spd and yes I think it is very achievable.

My goal for my wifes car is 500 rwhp, which I also think is achievable. If I cannot get the car to 500 then I am going to **** can the Stage 3 project because in my opinion the cost and complexity to get the car past the 400 rwhp mark to only make an extra 50 rwhp isn't worth it.

Here is a Stage One Dyno

AO

600 would be nice Tim. I'm sure you'll get there. Personally, I'd love to see 475. DR thinks it's there, just need to spend some quality time with a SharkTuner at a Dyno shop.

Here's a virtual drag rage between your ***** and mine (I got thoroughly spanked!)

Imo000

Can you input just the raw 1/4 mile data and have the G-tech software run a simulated comparison against an actual G-tech run?

AO

I don't think so. I know you can export the data into an excel file, but I don't think you can import it.

BTW (unrelated to the above), I just learned that when i dyno'd the car I had the guy hooking up the boost sensor to before the intercooler which will result in a reading .5 - .7 psi higher than actual boost. My datalog said I made 7.1psi which is probably more accurate.