Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

16V twin screw SC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2007, 12:35 PM
  #16  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a4sfed928
I've looked at this site and I can't read it but I thought he was running approx 9psi from the MAP log. Do you know if he increased the boost from what the MAP log shows? I have an AutoRotor that I'm installing on a 1980 16V and I'm having trouble finding injectors that fit the stock rail.
I'm not sure you can do it, but you might consider trying S4 fuel rails. There's a variety of injector sizes that will work with those, e.g. 24, 30, 42.

Edit: D'oh! Nevermind! I didn't consider the electrical connections.
Old 03-29-2007, 12:50 PM
  #17  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,599
Received 2,217 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a4sfed928
I've looked at this site and I can't read it but I thought he was running approx 9psi from the MAP log. Do you know if he increased the boost from what the MAP log shows? I have an AutoRotor that I'm installing on a 1980 16V and I'm having trouble finding injectors that fit the stock rail.
The stock injectors are 24lbs - more than enough for 14psi on these cars. Tim Murphy has pushed the stock S4 19lb injectors to over 10psi with no issues.

Is it ideal? No, but how much boost are you shooting for? If under 10psi, start small & get that to work. I'm running just fine with the stock injectors with 6+ pounts of boost. I say 6+ because on a cold 40 degree morning like today, it's making more power than the 6.1 pounds of boost I saw on the dyno in July. Air / Fuel is still perfect.

Everyone is always in such a hurry to swap out injectors. Fueling the car under boost is the easy part (at lest with a centrifugal it is). The hard part is day to day driveability.

If you are running an aftermarket ECU - then yes, everything I just said is out the window.
Old 03-29-2007, 01:50 PM
  #18  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
The stock injectors are 24lbs - more than enough for 14psi on these cars. Tim Murphy has pushed the stock S4 19lb injectors to over 10psi with no issues.
.........
Everyone is always in such a hurry to swap out injectors. Fueling the car under boost is the easy part (at lest with a centrifugal it is). The hard part is day to day driveability.
.

IF..IF...you really jack up the Fuel pressure. Sure...and the level it will take, i would DEFINTITLY check the hoses on an older 16 V car and make sure you have a pump to push it..

Or...

Use a Sharktuner and then have a pump adequete to flow that much fuel at/near 90-100% duty at the lower pressure.

On an 16v car, i dont think any of those are an opiton yet?

With the prices and "simplicity" of 16v cars, id love to see some good HP numbers added to them!
Old 03-29-2007, 02:06 PM
  #19  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony
With the prices and "simplicity" of 16v cars, id love to see some good HP numbers added to them!
Agreed! Sure would be cool to get a nice setup for say, less than $10k, that would spank some butt!
Old 03-29-2007, 02:16 PM
  #20  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony
With the prices and "simplicity" of 16v cars, id love to see some good HP numbers added to them!
How does over 400 rwhp and 450 lb/ft of torque sound on a 4.7l sound? And yes, there is a dyno chart available. It is a car here in FL. You actually know the car and the builder.
Old 03-29-2007, 04:54 PM
  #21  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,599
Received 2,217 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony
IF..IF...you really jack up the Fuel pressure. Sure
Bingo!
Like I said, maybe not 100% ideal, but it works.
Originally Posted by Tony
i would DEFINTITLY check the hoses on an older 16 V car and make sure you have a pump to push it..
I agree 100% - also, anyone making any type of performance gains should be checking / replacing 20 year old hoses anyway.
[QUOTE=Tony]Use a Sharktuner and then have a pump adequete to flow that much fuel at/near 90-100% duty at the lower pressure.

On an 16v car, i dont think any of those are an opiton yet? [QUOTE=Tony]
No Sharktuner for the L-Jet. Even the 951 updates do not work on the 928 due to different voltages in the systems.
Originally Posted by Tony
With the prices and "simplicity" of 16v cars, id love to see some good HP numbers added to them!
I’m already around 340bhp with my 81 with low boost and the original 4.5 liter.
Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Agreed! Sure would be cool to get a nice setup for say, less than $10k, that would spank some butt!
$10k? Hell, for an OB that can include the car!!!
Originally Posted by Fabio421
How does over 400 rwhp and 450 lb/ft of torque sound on a 4.7l sound? And yes, there is a dyno chart available. It is a car here in FL. You actually know the car and the builder.
Share the details – not sure how I missed this car if it was posted here in the last 5 years. Sounds cool.

Jean-Louis posted around 380rwhp with a 10.4:1 Euro with low boost & no intercooler. This setup survived 2-3 track weekends with two drivers. Anyone who knows JL is aware he does not ***** foot around Road America.

Hell, if I cranked up the timing I could rip off one impressive dyno chart. I would never dare drive it that way …..ok, maybe I would. JL’s car is the best example of what you can do with a 16V motor.
Old 03-29-2007, 05:33 PM
  #22  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker
$10k? Hell, for an OB that can include the car!!!
That's what I meant!
Old 03-29-2007, 05:41 PM
  #23  
ceedee
Three Wheelin'
 
ceedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: celtown, florida
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Bingo!

Share the details – not sure how I missed this car if it was posted here in the last 5 years. Sounds cool.
haha, i know the builder. but i am not telling...
Old 03-29-2007, 05:46 PM
  #24  
John V
Racer
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Attleboro, MA
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd like to know more about this one myself. You wet our appetites, you can't clam up now. Do tell!
Old 03-29-2007, 05:46 PM
  #25  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,599
Received 2,217 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

If it's who I think it might be - the car isn't L-Jet anymore & has had other modifications. Not hat it matters, just worth mentioning.

Hell, there's a 2.2 liter in Green Bay putting 722 down to the wheels Anything is possible with the right parts.
Old 03-29-2007, 05:52 PM
  #26  
ceedee
Three Wheelin'
 
ceedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: celtown, florida
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Hell, there's a 2.2 liter in Green Bay putting 722 down to the wheels Anything is possible with the right parts.
true hacker,
anything is possible with the right parts, the ***** to do it and the brain to get/keep it operable.
Old 03-29-2007, 07:31 PM
  #27  
a4sfed928
Pro
 
a4sfed928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Summerville SC
Posts: 595
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Tony]IF..IF...you really jack up the Fuel pressure. Sure...and the level it will take, i would DEFINTITLY check the hoses on an older 16 V car and make sure you have a pump to push it..

I am tring to avoid this with the proper sized injectors since mine need replaced anyway. I think I'm getting close to a solution now.
Old 03-29-2007, 07:34 PM
  #28  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,599
Received 2,217 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a4sfed928
I am tring to avoid this with the proper sized injectors since mine need replaced anyway. I think I'm getting close to a solution now.
I agree this is the correct approach. Problem is, the L-Jet computer is set for 24lb injectors. So when under vacuum (95% of your driving) too much fuel will be entering the cylinders. Like I said, tuning for boost is easy, the daily driving part is the PIA. If this were a track car it wouldn't matter. Dumping that much fuel as you putter along the highway at 65mph is going to foul your plugs and kill the O2 sensor.

Speaking from experience here, just trying to help. If you found a way to dial fuel back under vacuum for non-boost driving. Awesome!!!! Please share!!!
Old 03-29-2007, 10:02 PM
  #29  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I'm not able to post the builder, there is a gag order in place. Lets just call the builder Schmoopie. Hacker is on the right track. I believe the car is still running the L-Jet however it has been modified to use a MAF instead of an AFM to increase throttle response and allow for laptop tuning. Its actually an affordable route to take to get a tuneable fuel system in an OB.
Old 03-29-2007, 10:22 PM
  #30  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,599
Received 2,217 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
I believe the car is still running the L-Jet however it has been modified to use a MAF instead of an AFM to increase throttle response and allow for laptop tuning.
Then it's running MAF and not L-Jet......

I've thought about doing this. Maybe in the future I'll drop the L-jet system or switch to an adapted system like this.

I'll be switching my 79 CIS to either the EuroS EFI system or an aftermarket setup such as autronic before I add any boost.


Quick Reply: 16V twin screw SC?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:36 AM.