Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rear axial nut torque 320 Ft Lbs's ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2007, 06:53 PM
  #1  
Tampa 928s
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Tampa 928s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Rear axial nut torque 320 Ft Lbs's ??

Any one know the torque settings on the rear axial nut, my wrench only goes to 250 Ft Lbs.
Old 03-20-2007, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

460 NM or about 350 ft lbs is install torque BUT they are often MUCH tighter !
Old 03-20-2007, 07:37 PM
  #3  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I thought it was 332 ft/lbs -- you can either rent the right tool, buy/rent an extender that will allow you to do the job with the wrench you have, or torque it to 250 and bring it to a shop that can put the final twist on it.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:01 PM
  #4  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

3/4" breaker bar and socket - extend to 3feet long with pipe, stand on bathroom scales and pull up until you are 110lbs approx heavier - 110lbs x 3ft = 330 ft lbs
Old 03-20-2007, 08:06 PM
  #5  
Tampa 928s
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Tampa 928s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default And the number is !

Well is it 350 332 or 330 Maybe I'll get my fat friend over to sit on the wrench sure can"t fit in the car I'll take it to a truck shop just needed the torque settings.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:06 PM
  #6  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

"332 ft/lbs? Only a girlie man could not do that, Hans."
"Ja, Franz, I could do that using only my pointing finger."


Rich
Old 03-20-2007, 08:13 PM
  #7  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It is 322 in the WSM.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:31 PM
  #8  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Funny -- Tech booklet calls for 460 Nm which works out to 339 ft/lb -- not that 10 ft/lb(3%) either way is going to make much of a difference, but it's interesting to see all the different #'s whenever torque specs are mentioned.

Old 03-20-2007, 08:49 PM
  #9  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Interesting !
Attached Images  
Old 03-21-2007, 01:12 PM
  #10  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Clearly the number conversions were not all done at the same time -- I believe this one was converted to ft/lb early on a Monday morning or late on a Friday evening. As I said before, 460 Nm works out to 339 ft/lbs. There are other errors(can't recall specific examples offhand) and often they will round down more than I care for -- for example they will state that 11.99 ft/lbs is 11 ft/lbs.
Old 03-21-2007, 01:21 PM
  #11  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

330 or 350 is the same to me. That's less than 10% difference.
Old 03-21-2007, 01:38 PM
  #12  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The quick conversion from NM to ft lbs is 3/4 or .75 not real accurate but neither are many torque wrenches What you are doing is pressing together the two inner races of the dual angular contact rear wheel bearing and by design there is no compression or preload.
Old 03-21-2007, 02:10 PM
  #13  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,671
Received 580 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jon928se
3/4" breaker bar and socket - extend to 3feet long with pipe, stand on bathroom scales and pull up until you are 110lbs approx heavier - 110lbs x 3ft = 330 ft lbs
Nice one!
Old 03-21-2007, 02:14 PM
  #14  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would rather just stand on a one foot breaker bar...since most bathroom scales do NOT read over 300.
Old 03-21-2007, 03:36 PM
  #15  
aggravation
Burning Brakes
 
aggravation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if I put my fat 220 pound self on the end of a 1.5 foot bar I'll have it torqued properly? Hard to imagine my fat butt standing on the end of a wrench which is locked onto a nut on my 19 year old Porsche without having a bolt wring right off of there! Somebody check my math please!


Quick Reply: Rear axial nut torque 320 Ft Lbs's ??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:00 PM.