Does anti-seize change torque settings?
#16
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by SharkSkin
FWIW, the big bolts around the bellhousing and at both ends of the TT have copper anti-seize on them -- most other bolts that have not been disturbed(when you find them) have copper anti-seize as well. I'd think that Porsche figured this into the torque spec.
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by SharkSkin
Jon, I seem to recall something like that in the tech docs but I don't have time to go looking for it.
Daniel, alignment guys tend to get lazy IMHO they tighten and loosen so much that they often don't bother with a torque wrench. I think that a hamfisted tech will strip stuff with or without antiseize.
Daniel, alignment guys tend to get lazy IMHO they tighten and loosen so much that they often don't bother with a torque wrench. I think that a hamfisted tech will strip stuff with or without antiseize.
#19
Rennlist Member
Jon, I'm not sure where I might(or might not) have seen that in the Porsche literature, but it's been my practice to always use antiseize unless a specific procedure is called out, like with head bolts. I have never, ever broken or stripped a fastener that I had previously installed with anti-seize. I recently did a little wrenching on the truck I've had for ~22 years, some of the fasteners I hadn't touched in close to 20 years -- and they came right apart. YMMV.
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by SharkSkin
Jon, I'm not sure where I might(or might not) have seen that in the Porsche literature, but it's been my practice to always use antiseize unless a specific procedure is called out, like with head bolts. I have never, ever broken or stripped a fastener that I had previously installed with anti-seize. I recently did a little wrenching on the truck I've had for ~22 years, some of the fasteners I hadn't touched in close to 20 years -- and they came right apart. YMMV.
I was more asking the question "Does anyone know what the form is?" for those "all other " bolts. Not trying to provoke an argument or even vaguely provoke a non argument if that makes sense.
Sounds like your practice is the same as mine where there is no obvious WSM specific procedure. Where it doesn't say "do it this way", I'll do it my way, based upon about 25 years of sometimes expensively learned lessons (and you'll do it your way which sounds like it would be the same as my way)
Unfortunately for those reading and wrenching for the first time with a void in the WSM and no experience gained through **** ups on less expensive subjects this could lead to a block with a load of holes with no thread left in them.
I recently had news of my first Landrover - sold 21 years ago when it was then 23 years young. Amongst many other jobs I did while owning it, the most taxing was a suspension rebuild The most useful spanner was conncted to two bottles one named oxy and the other named acetylene. I rebuilt it all using plated bolts and used antisieze.
The current owner has just rebuilt the suspension and it all came apart with no problems.
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
RE: Torque settings and Anti-seize, take a look at these links:
http://www.saftlok.com/safteze/antiseiz/index.htm
http://mdmetric.com/tech/data1torque.html
I'm not sure I can fully decipher the second link but it seems to also substantiate a reduction in torque when using anti-seize.
Harvey
http://www.saftlok.com/safteze/antiseiz/index.htm
http://mdmetric.com/tech/data1torque.html
I'm not sure I can fully decipher the second link but it seems to also substantiate a reduction in torque when using anti-seize.
Harvey
#24
Rennlist Member
I really began to wonder about this Harvey, so I called Sunset Porsche here in Oregon and talked with the service manager.
I posed the question "Does the Porsche WSM stated torque values take into account the use of anti-seize or lubricated threads?"
Answer is beginning in 1993 Porsche began taking into account the use of anti-seize on torque values specified in ALL WSM's. Before 1993 the values were specified for lubricated threads only."
He iterated that this is one reason why there is usually a span to the torque value (like 10 +2) because if you use a lubricant you use the lower value, without it you increase it by the +2 amount.
I asked about using anti-seize on early 928's (like early 80's) he said to use the lower value should be fine; however, you could call some Porsche shops and see what they do for the earlier cars.
I hope this helps
I posed the question "Does the Porsche WSM stated torque values take into account the use of anti-seize or lubricated threads?"
Answer is beginning in 1993 Porsche began taking into account the use of anti-seize on torque values specified in ALL WSM's. Before 1993 the values were specified for lubricated threads only."
He iterated that this is one reason why there is usually a span to the torque value (like 10 +2) because if you use a lubricant you use the lower value, without it you increase it by the +2 amount.
I asked about using anti-seize on early 928's (like early 80's) he said to use the lower value should be fine; however, you could call some Porsche shops and see what they do for the earlier cars.
I hope this helps
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks, Tom. That's helpful. I just know what a bear it is to fix stripped threads or broken bolts. What I don't want to know is what would happen if a WP bolt were to back out because it wasn't torqued enough.
The info you've provided is great...and obviously works.
Harvey
The info you've provided is great...and obviously works.
Harvey
#26
Rennlist Member
Thanks for the info, Tom.
Harvey, on that first link, read the fine print... it's general practice to at least put some engine oil on threads, but they are comparing their product to "dry threads". This is kind of like the mouthwash ads -- "reduces cavities X% over brushing alone"... but if you read the fine print, "brushing alone" means using no toothpaste at all. (BTW it was my dentist who pointed that one out to me).
Kind of an unfair comparison, I'd guess the difference between anti-seize and oil would be less than 10%.
Acrobat Reader being the utter piece of garbage that it is, it crashed 4 times trying to search through my PDF WSM's... but before I said to hell with it, I ran across this note about spark plugs:
Tech Bulletin 1984-1993, P.34 of PDF, group 4 #8403:
is recommended to lubricate the threads of spark plugs lightly with graphite grease (Molykote paste HTP white), or equivalent, prlor to lnstallatlon. Make sure paste is kept off the electrode and inside of the spark plug
They also mention using Optimoly HT(Copper paste) on lug nuts and tightening to 96 ft/lbs., but I didn't copy down the exact location of this reference. What it means though, is that everyone who has been torquing their lug nuts to 96 ft/lbs *without* anti-seize has been under-torquing their lug nuts, and everyone who does not use anti-seize on their sparkplugs has been under-torquing them....
Very likely there are other references... I'm too frustrated with A-Dopey Inc. and their POS Reader right now to find them.
Harvey, on that first link, read the fine print... it's general practice to at least put some engine oil on threads, but they are comparing their product to "dry threads". This is kind of like the mouthwash ads -- "reduces cavities X% over brushing alone"... but if you read the fine print, "brushing alone" means using no toothpaste at all. (BTW it was my dentist who pointed that one out to me).
Kind of an unfair comparison, I'd guess the difference between anti-seize and oil would be less than 10%.
Acrobat Reader being the utter piece of garbage that it is, it crashed 4 times trying to search through my PDF WSM's... but before I said to hell with it, I ran across this note about spark plugs:
Tech Bulletin 1984-1993, P.34 of PDF, group 4 #8403:
is recommended to lubricate the threads of spark plugs lightly with graphite grease (Molykote paste HTP white), or equivalent, prlor to lnstallatlon. Make sure paste is kept off the electrode and inside of the spark plug
They also mention using Optimoly HT(Copper paste) on lug nuts and tightening to 96 ft/lbs., but I didn't copy down the exact location of this reference. What it means though, is that everyone who has been torquing their lug nuts to 96 ft/lbs *without* anti-seize has been under-torquing their lug nuts, and everyone who does not use anti-seize on their sparkplugs has been under-torquing them....
Very likely there are other references... I'm too frustrated with A-Dopey Inc. and their POS Reader right now to find them.
#27
Rennlist Member
OK, one more:
P. 40-14 of WSM:
Optimoly HT (copper-colored)
For steel-steel threaded connections and contact surfaces of assembly parts. Never use Optimoly HT on contact surfaces of steel to light alloy, as moisture will produce corrosion. When applied to threads, this lubricant has no effect on tightening
torques.
Optimoly TA (aluminum color)
For all connections with aluminum or with magnesium, for corrosion protection. When applied to threads, this lubricant has a slight effect on tightening torques.
Done now.
P. 40-14 of WSM:
Optimoly HT (copper-colored)
For steel-steel threaded connections and contact surfaces of assembly parts. Never use Optimoly HT on contact surfaces of steel to light alloy, as moisture will produce corrosion. When applied to threads, this lubricant has no effect on tightening
torques.
Optimoly TA (aluminum color)
For all connections with aluminum or with magnesium, for corrosion protection. When applied to threads, this lubricant has a slight effect on tightening torques.
Done now.
#28
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Dave,
If you were in my class...I'd give you an "A" Anyone who can negotiate the WSM and actually find the answer you're looking for must be clarivoyant.
Gracias! Now....back to torquing.
Harvey
If you were in my class...I'd give you an "A" Anyone who can negotiate the WSM and actually find the answer you're looking for must be clarivoyant.
Gracias! Now....back to torquing.
Harvey
#29
ALL Alloy engines require Anti seize on Bolt threads. The Bolts are NOT aluminum. The threads ARE!
Set snug. Tighten a bit more, and don't worry about the Tork Wrench. Aluminum expands more than Steel!
Temps set them happy. If you crank the bolt too much. it galls and destroys the alloy thread.
The Aluminum block and threads are the STD!
Set snug. Tighten a bit more, and don't worry about the Tork Wrench. Aluminum expands more than Steel!
Temps set them happy. If you crank the bolt too much. it galls and destroys the alloy thread.
The Aluminum block and threads are the STD!
#30
New bolts or studs for important job
I have seen lots of suspension nuts and bolts stripped out over the years from too much antiseize and over tightening. Big but few threads per inch. I have seen antiseize put on sparkplugs in such copious quantities that the plugs jammed halfway and stripped out the top of the hole. This would be in aluminum heads. A little goes a long way, and you can slather it on the exposed threads later if so desired. A classic example would be when the alignment guy stripped out the two excentric bolts that align the rear wheels on my OB. TONS of antisieze, NO brains. It costs a lot to buy those suckers new, not to mention the exquisite driving feel you get with loose excentric bolts on your rear wheels. In this case the loose nut was not behind the wheel for once.