Can someone look at their 87 or 88 S4 for me?
#46
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by heinrich
.......ANSWER: After lubricating the beads of an auto tire, no more than 40 PSI, should be used to seat the beads. If the beads don't seat at 40 PSI or less, deflate the tire, turn it 180 degrees on the rim, and inflate again. ONCE AGAIN, NEVER EXCEED 40 PSI WHEN MOUNTING AN AUTO TIRE ON A RIM IN YOUR ATTEMPT TO SEAT THE BEADS.
WOW! That's all? But now that I think of it, it makes sence. Most of the time the tire seats first and then it's pumped up to the proper pressure. Most shops use a standard of 36 psi on all tires. I have been perhaps a litle ignorant about proper tire pressure and have always pumped all tires up to 36psi. 36 seemed to me as a good general inplation level.
#48
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by heinrich
How bout now, time to bug out of the thread yet? ![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![evilgrin](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
#49
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bill Swift
I will have to defer to Porsche on that one H for the definitive answer, but I suspect it is the weight of our beloved beasts that determined the 16" wheel specification. There is a lot of weight in the rear of the 928.
ANd while we can argue that tire wear is not something we should be worrying about, it is a sign that perhaps the inflation value is sub-optimal. Nobody would advocate that when the shoulders are wearing that you shouldn't put in more air. The only reason to over-inflate is fuel-economy, and as Heinrich rightly points out, over inflation results in less traction.
One last point - Porsche is not infallible. While deferring to their engineering is sensible, blind faith in it is not.
#50
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[Flame suit ON]
My --guess-- is that the 44 PSI rear was to allow a bigger, more stable patch, and avoid that dreaded oversteer at all costs. I agree with the suggestion that high speed equals higher heat, especially when the presure is lower. There are times when I want some tread and sidewall flex for improved handling and ride quality. If I was cruising at 150+ on the Autobahn, I'd be willing to trade some of that ride quality for tire (and passenger) survival.
For most of the driving we do, including the very sort-duration blasts to 120+, a slightly lower pressure is fine.
-----
I try to keep in mind that there have been over three minor improvements made in tires since my car was asssembled, maybe four since it was penned and tested in prototype. My guess is that the testing wasn't done on SoCal freeways between 25 and 45 MPH with the occasional blast up to 75. They might have been driving a little faster, and needed sidewall stability at that speed that came easily with a few extra PSI in the tires.
------
The chalk method is not a bad way to get at least a ballpark inflation number. Better is a pyrometer or IR heat gun IMMEDIATELY after a series of high speed corners. For most the chalk will do fine, though. Drive the car the way you normally do, and see how far up the sidewall you are scrubbing in serious corners. If toyu are past the edge of the traed and into the sidewall, you may need more air. Is 32 enough? Not for me and the way I drive, with the roads I drive on and the tires I have. Is it enough for you? Might be, if you have stiffer sidewalls, weigh less, drive different roads using a different technique when cornering.
I have the option of measuring and tracking tire wear and tire temperature regularly. I find what works for me and my combination of factors, along with my expectations for ride quality, handling, steering sensitivity, tramlining, and high-speed handling and balance. Each of you has the same option. From that info you can decide what tire pressure to use. Me, I have 37 front and 40 rear. It's what works for me and my combination of circumstances. Perfect for you and the way you drive? It might be. It could happen. But you'd still end up testing and tweaking. After all, it's the easiest single suspension adjustment you can make that will affect handling, ride, and wear. All at the same time.
OK, back to your regularly scheduled 'mine is bigger than yours but you can't really tell 'cuz it isn't fully inflated' discussion.
[flame suit /off]
My --guess-- is that the 44 PSI rear was to allow a bigger, more stable patch, and avoid that dreaded oversteer at all costs. I agree with the suggestion that high speed equals higher heat, especially when the presure is lower. There are times when I want some tread and sidewall flex for improved handling and ride quality. If I was cruising at 150+ on the Autobahn, I'd be willing to trade some of that ride quality for tire (and passenger) survival.
For most of the driving we do, including the very sort-duration blasts to 120+, a slightly lower pressure is fine.
-----
I try to keep in mind that there have been over three minor improvements made in tires since my car was asssembled, maybe four since it was penned and tested in prototype. My guess is that the testing wasn't done on SoCal freeways between 25 and 45 MPH with the occasional blast up to 75. They might have been driving a little faster, and needed sidewall stability at that speed that came easily with a few extra PSI in the tires.
------
The chalk method is not a bad way to get at least a ballpark inflation number. Better is a pyrometer or IR heat gun IMMEDIATELY after a series of high speed corners. For most the chalk will do fine, though. Drive the car the way you normally do, and see how far up the sidewall you are scrubbing in serious corners. If toyu are past the edge of the traed and into the sidewall, you may need more air. Is 32 enough? Not for me and the way I drive, with the roads I drive on and the tires I have. Is it enough for you? Might be, if you have stiffer sidewalls, weigh less, drive different roads using a different technique when cornering.
I have the option of measuring and tracking tire wear and tire temperature regularly. I find what works for me and my combination of factors, along with my expectations for ride quality, handling, steering sensitivity, tramlining, and high-speed handling and balance. Each of you has the same option. From that info you can decide what tire pressure to use. Me, I have 37 front and 40 rear. It's what works for me and my combination of circumstances. Perfect for you and the way you drive? It might be. It could happen. But you'd still end up testing and tweaking. After all, it's the easiest single suspension adjustment you can make that will affect handling, ride, and wear. All at the same time.
OK, back to your regularly scheduled 'mine is bigger than yours but you can't really tell 'cuz it isn't fully inflated' discussion.
[flame suit /off]
#52
928 Collector
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Tahoe Shark
I think everyone must remember that in 1988 tires were a lot different than they are today. What started this thread is that I have changed the size of tire on my ORR car and wanted a starting place for air pressure at various speeds. I won't try to second guess why Porsche rated the pressure they did it 1988 but they did it in conjunction with the tire manufacturer.I would also venture to guess that there are no 1988 928's around that still are shod with original tires, original sizes perhaps but not the tires that were produced in 1988.
So this is the info Michelin gave me about my new tires as cross referenced from the ORIGINAL manufacturer data. Tires are PS2's in 245/45/18 (Y) 26.7" front and 275/40/18 (Y) 26.6" rear .
Speed Front Rear
0-143mph 32 30.5
143 -149 33.5 32
149-155 35 33.5
155-161 38 36.5
161-170 39.5 38
170-???? 39.5 38
Personally I would not run the tires that low at the 0-143 mph speed, but that is my decision. Michelin says it's OK. I'm quite sure that Michelin would not have given the same recommendation in 1988.
So this is the info Michelin gave me about my new tires as cross referenced from the ORIGINAL manufacturer data. Tires are PS2's in 245/45/18 (Y) 26.7" front and 275/40/18 (Y) 26.6" rear .
Speed Front Rear
0-143mph 32 30.5
143 -149 33.5 32
149-155 35 33.5
155-161 38 36.5
161-170 39.5 38
170-???? 39.5 38
Personally I would not run the tires that low at the 0-143 mph speed, but that is my decision. Michelin says it's OK. I'm quite sure that Michelin would not have given the same recommendation in 1988.
![bowdown](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bowdown.gif)
#53
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lake Tahoe, Ca
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Uh Oh, H agrees with me.
Please don't take this example to mean that if you run the stock tire size you can use these pressures, you can not. This example is for the stated tire sizes only no others.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Please don't take this example to mean that if you run the stock tire size you can use these pressures, you can not. This example is for the stated tire sizes only no others.
#54
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here, I updated Tim's chart, so everybody will know their correct tire pressure....and top speed.
Now, being serious, I remember an article in Panorama a couple years ago which had a Q&A session with a Porsche engineer. His recommendation for tire pressures was +1psi for the tires under the engine vs. the tires at the other end. Tim's Michelin data seems to reinforce this.
Rich
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Originally Posted by Tahoe Shark
So this is the info Michelin gave me about my new tires as cross referenced from the ORIGINAL manufacturer data. Tires are PS2's in 245/45/18 (Y) 26.7" front and 275/40/18 (Y) 26.6" rear .
Speed Front Rear
0-143mph 32 30.5 Heinrich....and most everybody else here
143 -149 33.5 32
149-155 35 33.5 Me
155-161 38 36.5
161-170 39.5 38 Bill Ball
170-???? 39.5 38 Tim & Cheryl......and George Suennen
Speed Front Rear
0-143mph 32 30.5 Heinrich....and most everybody else here
143 -149 33.5 32
149-155 35 33.5 Me
155-161 38 36.5
161-170 39.5 38 Bill Ball
170-???? 39.5 38 Tim & Cheryl......and George Suennen
Now, being serious, I remember an article in Panorama a couple years ago which had a Q&A session with a Porsche engineer. His recommendation for tire pressures was +1psi for the tires under the engine vs. the tires at the other end. Tim's Michelin data seems to reinforce this.
Rich
#56
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey H, I think I see the reason for Porsche's 36/44 psi spec's and it's in the data Michelin sent to Tim. Notice the tire pressure recomendation goes up with speed. Since the later versions of our cars are capable of quite high speeds, it seems the pressures designated are for high-speed stability.
Haven't read the previous responses yet, so if i'm repeating someone here...
Haven't read the previous responses yet, so if i'm repeating someone here...
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#57
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by fabric
One last point - Porsche is not infallible. While deferring to their engineering is sensible, blind faith in it is not.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#58
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
If my 79 gets anywhere near 40psi in the rear, I might as well be on marbles. This is on 17" or 18" wheels
.
Originally Posted by Bill Swift
EXACTLY!!! 16" are a different story H. This is my point.
#59
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Richard S
Here, I updated Tim's chart, so everybody will know their correct tire pressure....and top speed.
Now, being serious, I remember an article in Panorama a couple years ago which had a Q&A session with a Porsche engineer. His recommendation for tire pressures was +1psi for the tires under the engine vs. the tires at the other end. Tim's Michelin data seems to reinforce this.
Rich
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Now, being serious, I remember an article in Panorama a couple years ago which had a Q&A session with a Porsche engineer. His recommendation for tire pressures was +1psi for the tires under the engine vs. the tires at the other end. Tim's Michelin data seems to reinforce this.
Rich
#60
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bill, as far as I recall, it was all models. I would really have to dig through the old issues to find it, best guess would be an old TechTactics article.
Rich
Rich