SHARKTUNER Results!
#17
Hi Dr bob
I would be interested in some shark tunner time.
Jhon is there any chance of developing an entire new computer to replace the ezk and Lh or is the cost to prohibitive? I was trying to get to your site last week have you got things straightened out I have a LH that needs some repair.
Thanks Chris
I would be interested in some shark tunner time.
Jhon is there any chance of developing an entire new computer to replace the ezk and Lh or is the cost to prohibitive? I was trying to get to your site last week have you got things straightened out I have a LH that needs some repair.
Thanks Chris
#18
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by 1slo928
Hi Dr bob
I would be interested in some shark tunner time.
Jhon is there any chance of developing an entire new computer to replace the ezk and Lh or is the cost to prohibitive? I was trying to get to your site last week have you got things straightened out I have a LH that needs some repair.
Thanks Chris
I would be interested in some shark tunner time.
Jhon is there any chance of developing an entire new computer to replace the ezk and Lh or is the cost to prohibitive? I was trying to get to your site last week have you got things straightened out I have a LH that needs some repair.
Thanks Chris
Hi Bob, there's your first justification :-)
Hi Chris,
It is not cost effective to replace the LH and EZK. With the ST they are prefectly capable of being reprogrammed for any of the 928 applications that have come up so far.
There have been problems with my website hosting, which I am addressing.
Please PM me about your LH.
A completely new, reliable website will be running in a couiple of weeks time.
#19
Drifting
john, i think there is a market for an onboard version of the sharktuner - permanently interfaced giving user programability on the move in real time! since sharktuning i have regained my flappy but im wondering now whether some of the advance we put in through the midrange might not be too much and i cant alter that now. also i was looking at some headers day before yesterday and to optimise there effect i would need to sharktune again i know its all good in the greater scheme of things and its only a question of some horsepower or more... anyway i need to collect bits and pieces for my supercharger firstly.
#21
Instructor
Originally Posted by 1slo928
John is there any chance of developing an entire new computer to replace the ezk and Lh or is the cost too prohibitive?
There are others as well - Search the forums for 'MegaSquirt'
#22
Originally Posted by Lance J
What bodykit is that?????
#23
Rennlist Member
I think the Megasquirt is not so easy to adapt to the 928 except for an expert user. The car has to be substantially modified from standard to fit it.
If someone is very much a skilled electronics experimenter, then yes, it is an interesting alternative.
If someone is very much a skilled electronics experimenter, then yes, it is an interesting alternative.
#24
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by drnick
john, i think there is a market for an onboard version of the sharktuner - permanently interfaced giving user programability on the move in real time!
Nick, just curious, when you were shartuning, did you ever notice day to day changes with your mixture when using the same fuel map?
I'm still learning all this, but I have noticed slight mixture changes on some areas of one map that I optimized the day prior. I know engine temp plays a role, as well as a ton of other variables. Just courious what you have seen with your efforts.
Also, just discovered that my LH for this car had gone bad before, and never knew it. Found out it was not reading the WOT signal from the throttle switch, and thus was never getting WOT enrichment before.... (not too good on a s/c motor)
The datalogging feature of the ST showed this when I was trying to do WOT tuning runs.
#25
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Hey Bill. and or John
I remember you saying that your harness didnt have the diagnostics port to hook up the ST. You made your own plug and tapped in to the harness to do it correct?
I was wondering....Dariens car an 86.5 doesnt have the port either ( i dont think)....could a similar thing be done to his and or others??
I remember you saying that your harness didnt have the diagnostics port to hook up the ST. You made your own plug and tapped in to the harness to do it correct?
I was wondering....Dariens car an 86.5 doesnt have the port either ( i dont think)....could a similar thing be done to his and or others??
#26
Drifting
bill, i spent about 3 hours with john doing each of the computers in turn on different days and overall it has been running pretty consistently since that time. the air fuel numbers that im seeing on my permanently installed gauge seem slightly to the rich side but not by much if anything of what we set with the sharktuner. i know john has mentioned these temporary episode thingies where the lh refers to a different map or something for a few seconds/minutes.. but overall the car runs really consistently. i think that when i get my blower installed i will want to take a bit longer than we did this time to get the maps just right, maybe with repeated sessions.
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got my Shark Tuner connections sorted out today. I was having trouble with the Innovate LC-1 analog signal that feeds the A/F info to the SharkTuner. I have a couple of things to button up in the engine compartment, before I can go out and run the auto-tune on the street. I found that initial A/F numbers were actually quite lean..... in the 15-16:1 range. That surprized me because the exhaust smells rich. Anyway, hitting the AutoTune button is amazing, even only at idle. The A/F number settle to mid 14's quite quickly and the idle smooths right out. It wasn't BAD to start with, but it literally purrrrrrs with the auto-tune running. I can hardly wait to get out on the street......
Oh ya.......... snow is forcast for tomorrow!
Oh ya.......... snow is forcast for tomorrow!
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Tony
Hey Bill. and or John
I remember you saying that your harness didnt have the diagnostics port to hook up the ST. You made your own plug and tapped in to the harness to do it correct?
I was wondering....Dariens car an 86.5 doesnt have the port either ( i dont think)....could a similar thing be done to his and or others??
I remember you saying that your harness didnt have the diagnostics port to hook up the ST. You made your own plug and tapped in to the harness to do it correct?
I was wondering....Dariens car an 86.5 doesnt have the port either ( i dont think)....could a similar thing be done to his and or others??
John,
Would the ST software work on Darien's 86.5?