View Poll Results: Are you interested in building a high HP N/A engine
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll
How many of your would consider a stroker if you could build the bottom end for $5000
#16
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stroking a 5L to 6L will need additional flow from the heads and intake as well, correct?
So to get the performance capability of the 6L bottom end, the top end will still need work, right?
So to get the performance capability of the 6L bottom end, the top end will still need work, right?
#17
Road Warrior
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
good prices on those rods and pistons greg!! I used the 6 counter weight moldex and balanced everything at the same time w/the pistons, rods, etc. didn't need much as I told moldex what I was using so they just built the crank accordingly. greg at precision has been using this formula for a while now and has been quietly cranking these out like hot cakes for SOCAL shark owners.
not that easy w/968 pistons. the 968 pistons are rather tall on the compression height, and will yield static comp. of 11.6:1 or so w/a 97mm stroke crank, " std"5.85" rods and average deck heights. so you'd either have to reduce the stroke, or use shorter/custom length rods... been a lot of talk about that dilemma on this board over the years. that's part of the reason I went w/custom JE's w/968 flycuts and a lower CH. I also don't trust the mahle coating thing after pulling out my pistons and seeing how scuffed up they were. imo, nicom is much more durable and w/AL pistons it's proven technology w/nascar, lots of other motors.
stan - I don't think any serious engine builder would even consider increasing displacement w/out increasing valves, ports, exhaust, etc to keep up w/the flow. even w/all that I know I could get another 140rwhp if I used a CF or ITB intake system cause it's pretty restricted to about 450-500chp or so w/the stock intake system. but I think you already knew that
brendan - took apart the new car already??
U R da man!
Originally Posted by Vilhuer
I know Greg, 968 pistons are decades old tech. I just happen to have full set and only need Moldex crank and custom rods. Been thinking about ordering crank for long time already but always something else like really cheap '90 S4 automatic box I just can't pass etc. has gotten in way. If you plan on ordering batch from them send one for me also. Thanks.
stan - I don't think any serious engine builder would even consider increasing displacement w/out increasing valves, ports, exhaust, etc to keep up w/the flow. even w/all that I know I could get another 140rwhp if I used a CF or ITB intake system cause it's pretty restricted to about 450-500chp or so w/the stock intake system. but I think you already knew that
brendan - took apart the new car already??
U R da man!
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Rob,
I wasn't sure if I was missing something. I thought some here might be thinking that a $5k stroker shortblock would be equivalent to an SC setup.
I wasn't sure if I was missing something. I thought some here might be thinking that a $5k stroker shortblock would be equivalent to an SC setup.
#20
Drifting
Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Stroking a 5L to 6L will need additional flow from the heads and intake as well, correct?
So to get the performance capability of the 6L bottom end, the top end will still need work, right?
So to get the performance capability of the 6L bottom end, the top end will still need work, right?
From a previous thread:
"GREG_If somebody could post them, my spreadsheet that is, I will email you my headflow figures for my 2 valve Euro, it will flow just under 600 hp with the cams I have. The spreadsheet is in excel format. It is quite clear but this is the best I could scan. "
Don't know the poster, but it seems to have enough capacity. Greg has done his valve work though. I have been paying attention to this stuff with the thought one day of making a reallly hot n/a euro engine.
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TV,
My only question is what work (expense) is required to make the heads flow well enough. I am presuming the comment you pulled does not refer to stock heads, right?
My only question is what work (expense) is required to make the heads flow well enough. I am presuming the comment you pulled does not refer to stock heads, right?
#22
Originally Posted by bd0nalds0n
So what was that, two weeks of ownership before you've taken the S2000 motor apart?
Ah, Brian, I have resisted. I have pictures, but not of my own engine. I did do the exhaust though. And a cat bypass.
And because of the prices of things, I can buy a longblock to play with so there is no downtime.
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by 928SS
not that easy w/968 pistons. the 968 pistons are rather tall on the compression height, and will yield static comp. of 11.6:1 or so w/a 97mm stroke crank, " std"5.85" rods and average deck heights. so you'd either have to reduce the stroke, or use shorter/custom length rods...
#24
Road Warrior
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Isn't "stock" stroker crank 95.25 mm stroke? In any case I will most likely have custom rods made. There are semi finished chevy rods available locally which do not have upper hole drilled for example allowing minor adjustment by it's placement. Aim is to have compression somewhere between 10.5 and 11.0:1 with GT cams. Bore/sroke ration will not be best possible but rev limiter is going to be stock GTS or S4 anyway.
#26
Road Warrior
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
hey H mine is done/running, so it really doesn't do anything to my old gal. I used: http://kb-silvolite.com/index2.php to help w/compression calcs back in the day. I suppose if a thick enough head gasket is used, that might help keep compression down a bit too. I stuck close to OEM thickness on my head gaskets (.043") iirc, in order to keep quench undisturbed as much as possible. but I had JE hog out the pistons a bit more (around 35cc) than a std 968 (around 28cc, iirc) to help keep compression down w/a zero deck height and 5.85" cheby style rods. there's a few ways to skin the old cat, but keeping compression down enough for 92 octane CA street gas was probably the biggest challenge.
iirc, the cheby 7L motors have combustion chamber that 30% bigger than ours to keep compression down... since we cant' do much w/the heads, we're kinda stuck squeaking out extra space by bigger piston dishes or dropping the pistons down, larger head gaskets or sacraficing rod angle or stroke like V is planning.
cost calcs kinda depend on how much he got the 968 stuff for and the cost of custom rods, I'd guess... but the top end stuff/all the incidentials would remain. iirc, pauter does a nice custom rod in any length for around $1400.00 a set, and they use an offset bolt arrangement that eliminates the need for clearancing... iirc, olivers can also be used w/out any clearancing too - but I'm not sure about custom sizes w/them.
looks like greg's idea is pretty slick too. now if we could just find good builders that cost $20/hr instead of $100/hr and custom aftermarket heads for $1000/set, cams for $300/set complete (like cheby), we'd be in fat city!!
iirc, the cheby 7L motors have combustion chamber that 30% bigger than ours to keep compression down... since we cant' do much w/the heads, we're kinda stuck squeaking out extra space by bigger piston dishes or dropping the pistons down, larger head gaskets or sacraficing rod angle or stroke like V is planning.
cost calcs kinda depend on how much he got the 968 stuff for and the cost of custom rods, I'd guess... but the top end stuff/all the incidentials would remain. iirc, pauter does a nice custom rod in any length for around $1400.00 a set, and they use an offset bolt arrangement that eliminates the need for clearancing... iirc, olivers can also be used w/out any clearancing too - but I'm not sure about custom sizes w/them.
looks like greg's idea is pretty slick too. now if we could just find good builders that cost $20/hr instead of $100/hr and custom aftermarket heads for $1000/set, cams for $300/set complete (like cheby), we'd be in fat city!!
#27
928 Collector
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Rob, I hope we get to hang out a bit at SF06 .... My goal is to drop the GTS crank into an S4 motor (I have a few here) and go on down the road. To do this with minimal cost/fuss, I was thinking GTS pistons. However it appears those pistons are not easy to find. So since I have the 968 pistons sitting here looking pretty I may just drop them onto the GTS crank and S4 rods and an S4 block. Boring will be the cheapest solution then. However I need to figure out if the 968 pistons and GTS pistons have the same deck height I guess.
#28
Road Warrior
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
sounds like trouble, fun, or fun trouble iirc, boring and cyl prep on alusil was about the same as boring and nicom, fwiw. I've seen piston specs here before, if you can't find'em I've got some notes here... someplace
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by heinrich
However I need to figure out if the 968 pistons and GTS pistons have the same deck height I guess.
#30
Drifting
Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
TV,
My only question is what work (expense) is required to make the heads flow well enough. I am presuming the comment you pulled does not refer to stock heads, right?
My only question is what work (expense) is required to make the heads flow well enough. I am presuming the comment you pulled does not refer to stock heads, right?