Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

GTS Crank for $2,500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2012, 11:56 PM
  #31  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,468
Received 2,694 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Default

Just for posterity, here are GT vs. R1 GTS rods- exact same length.

Compression height on a GT piston is 42.8 mm, compression height on a GTS piston is 39.3 mm (my measurements..) . So with an S4/GT crank stroke of 78.9 mm, vs. GTS stroke is 85.9mm, the diff is 7 mm. So if the deck height is the same, and the rods are the same length, the compression height of the GTS piston is 3.5 mm less than an S4 piston.







Old 02-03-2012, 12:03 AM
  #32  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thanks Rob. Why would ordinary old 5-litre rods not work perfectly fine in a GTS engine?
Old 02-03-2012, 01:29 AM
  #33  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,468
Received 2,694 Likes on 1,304 Posts
Default

Dunno- are there clearance issues with the thicker shoulders on the GTS rods against the girdle?

Also, the GTS (R1 anyway) rods are a hell of a lot lighter than the GT rods, might create a problem with balancing?

GT rod: 846 grams

GT piston: 616 grams

GTS rod: 710 grams

GTS piston: 524 grams

GT crank: 25280 grams

GTS crank: 28436 grams.


So a set of GT rods and pistons is 11696 grams, vs. 9872 for GTS parts. That's a 4 pound difference. But the GTS crank is ~7 pounds heavier.

I won't pretend to understand all the factors in engine balancing, and I don't know how much the earlier forged S4 rods weigh, but it seems to me that you might run into balancing issues (?)

Then there's the matter of the cost of GTS rings....
Old 02-03-2012, 02:14 AM
  #34  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have all those parts. And while my R1 rods are perfect (I have then in my hands) Greg has promised me he will personally shove them up my tailpipe if I use them. So... assuming R2 rods are heavier as well, is there a reason to not use 5-litre rods? Anyone? Bueller?
Old 02-03-2012, 02:23 AM
  #35  
brutus
Burning Brakes
 
brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Rob may be right about the balancing you have to ask Why would Porsche design and produce the GTS rod if the old 5 liter rod would work just fine ?? You might need a bunch of heavy metal added which is expensive. I wonder how low the compression would be using GTS pistons on a 5 liter crank with S-4 heads or 85-86 heads ?
Old 02-03-2012, 06:30 PM
  #36  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Balancing and compression height are two big issues. 5L and 944 rods are so much heavier that I suspect even ultra light aftermarket pistons would require added weight into crank counterweights. In any case its possible to calculate if its needed when GTS and replacement rod big and small end weights are known. Formula is in archives in some old stroker thread.

So easiest option is to get custom GTS compression height pistons and either 2R or light custom rods. Without suitable pistons everything else is useless.
Old 02-04-2012, 02:24 AM
  #37  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,473 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
I have all those parts. And while my R1 rods are perfect (I have then in my hands) Greg has promised me he will personally shove them up my tailpipe if I use them. So... assuming R2 rods are heavier as well, is there a reason to not use 5-litre rods? Anyone? Bueller?
And then there are the people who will tell you that if a piece of steel (connecting rod) makes 100,000 cycles, it will last forever....

Porsche added material to the R1 rod, right were the beam meets the cap section.

This additional material no doubt added some stiffness to the rod, however the location of the additional material would make one think that Porsche must have been seeing cracks, in this area.

Magnafluxing some of these rods would be interesting....
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 02-04-2012, 09:13 AM
  #38  
daveo90s4
Pro
 
daveo90s4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 686
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Brutus, my calcs suggest that GTS pistons mated with S4 crank would yield static CR of 9.18:1. This on the basis that S4 and GTS are both 10:1 and S4 and GTS heads have the same chamber vol.

My logic as follows:
S4 swept vol = 619.9 cc / cyl so at static 10:1 CR unswept vol = 61.99 cc / cyl
GTS swept vol = 674.9 cc cyl so at static 10:1 CR unswept vol = 67.49 cc / cyl
S4 crank and GTS pistons swept vol = 619.9 cc/cyl and unswept vol = 67.49 cc / cyl so CR = 9.18:1
Caveats as above.
Old 02-04-2012, 02:19 PM
  #39  
cfc928gt
Rennlist Member
 
cfc928gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Weight and balance being an issue, how much more do R2 rods weigh over R1 rods? Does adding the addtional weight into an early 5.4 engine by swapping R2s for the R1s without some sort of rebalancing create problems? The TSB doesn't mention anything about it other than saying to swap the R2s for the R1s if more than one rod nut is removed so does this mean it's not an issue?
Old 02-04-2012, 05:02 PM
  #40  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

1R and 2R weight is same. No need to do anything to crank.
Old 02-04-2012, 06:21 PM
  #41  
cfc928gt
Rennlist Member
 
cfc928gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks Erkka. So if installing the R2 rods what else should be changed?
Old 02-04-2012, 09:21 PM
  #42  
Shark_Week
Racer
 
Shark_Week's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SD, Ca.
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what a loaded question
Old 02-06-2012, 11:09 AM
  #43  
Cosmo Kramer
Rennlist Member
 
Cosmo Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,654
Received 176 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Heinrich

Are you looking for a way to lower the CR to run more boost? If you are using a S4 crank I would think you would want to mate S4 rods to it just to ensure that there are no issues with thickness, weight etc. The GTS pistons are lighter as stated above so not sure how that would affect how everything balances out.
Old 02-06-2012, 11:26 AM
  #44  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thanks Ted ... nope.

I'm looking for a way to run my GTS crank and not pay $2,000 or even 1,000 for rods.

If that is the only option, I will not use the GTS crank.



Quick Reply: GTS Crank for $2,500



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:39 AM.