Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Advance CAM Timing (who's done it?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2006, 11:38 AM
  #16  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ken's tool is great... my cams were way out of whack (how, I don't know), but one was retarded 5 degrees and the other was advanced 2 degrees. I adjusted them both to 3 degrees retard for a race car.
Old 08-08-2006, 12:47 PM
  #17  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darien Nunn
Hi Andrew,

If everything goes right, Tony will stop by Thur and we'll give the porken tool a try
Maybe someone can 'splain this to me better than I can figure it out. Ken's tool is great, but seems to me to make no sense to use it with unknown initial cam/crank timing relationship. Once the cams are set to factory specs, using the WSM procedure, then of course change timing with Ken's tool as you wish without further having to take off the cam covers and go through the long WSM procedure.

Am I missing something? Until you are assured the cams are set to some known reference, even if you know how much you change them, you still don't know where you are. I've never checked cam timing on a 928 and found it to be correct. One side advanced, the other side retarded, or could be anything. Educate me. Is there an easier way to know for sure what the crank/cam timing relationship is than to grind through the WSM procedure?
Old 08-08-2006, 01:02 PM
  #18  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,144
Received 384 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

As much as I've heard back, and personally observed, after setting the cams with a dial indicator according to the WSM, the center of the parallel key keyway (which my tool indicates) is within a cam degree.

GT's appear to be advanced (1) degree to the keyway.

At different engine speeds, the timing is changing all the time with the different tolerances, engine temp, etc. It's not science, just valve timing.
Old 08-08-2006, 01:13 PM
  #19  
Darien
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,644
Received 241 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Louie,

Without having the CAM position "templates", I hope to get a good read with ken's tool. It should give me an idea if I'm way off or not..



Originally Posted by Louie928
Maybe someone can 'splain this to me better than I can figure it out. Ken's tool is great, but seems to me to make no sense to use it with unknown initial cam/crank timing relationship. Once the cams are set to factory specs, using the WSM procedure, then of course change timing with Ken's tool as you wish without further having to take off the cam covers and go through the long WSM procedure.

Am I missing something? Until you are assured the cams are set to some known reference, even if you know how much you change them, you still don't know where you are. I've never checked cam timing on a 928 and found it to be correct. One side advanced, the other side retarded, or could be anything. Educate me. Is there an easier way to know for sure what the crank/cam timing relationship is than to grind through the WSM procedure?
Old 08-08-2006, 01:44 PM
  #20  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
As much as I've heard back, and personally observed, after setting the cams with a dial indicator according to the WSM, the center of the parallel key keyway (which my tool indicates) is within a cam degree.

GT's appear to be advanced (1) degree to the keyway.

At different engine speeds, the timing is changing all the time with the different tolerances, engine temp, etc. It's not science, just valve timing.
Hmmm. So you reference to the keyway cut in the cam and depend on the lobes being correct with that? Ok. I'll buy it especially since you have experience with cross checking. That would be +/- 2 crank degrees. Probably close enough.
Old 08-08-2006, 02:21 PM
  #21  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Darien-
Did you ever re-run your compression test?
Old 08-08-2006, 02:22 PM
  #22  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

And if Tony is interested in using the cam timing tool, feel free to send it over to him. I've got his G-tech, so I can hold it randsome!
Old 08-08-2006, 05:59 PM
  #23  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Louis-

I had this same discussion offline with Keith and some others here in the SoCal area. My take is that it all depends on how well the camshaft factory did when they ground the cams from blanks. My concern I guess is that if the cams were so darn good and consistent from the grinder (+/- a degree or so) why do we have those big adjusting slots in the gears? Of course, the next question would go to whether the factory did any fine-tuning on a per-engine basis before the cars were delivered.

Just a heads-up to those doing the adjustments at home-- Keeping track of whether you are advancing or retarding the cams is very important. I've watched more than a few 'experts' move the gears clockwise, thinking they were moving the cams in the right direction. Moving the gears is the opposite of moving the cams, of course.
Old 08-08-2006, 08:31 PM
  #24  
Louie928
Three Wheelin'
 
Louie928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mosier, Oregon
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
Louis-

I had this same discussion offline with Keith and some others here in the SoCal area. My take is that it all depends on how well the camshaft factory did when they ground the cams from blanks. My concern I guess is that if the cams were so darn good and consistent from the grinder (+/- a degree or so) why do we have those big adjusting slots in the gears? Of course, the next question would go to whether the factory did any fine-tuning on a per-engine basis before the cars were delivered.

Just a heads-up to those doing the adjustments at home-- Keeping track of whether you are advancing or retarding the cams is very important. I've watched more than a few 'experts' move the gears clockwise, thinking they were moving the cams in the right direction. Moving the gears is the opposite of moving the cams, of course.
I'm guessing the sprocket slots are mostly to account for differences in belt lengths. You always set timing with a used belt since it's different with a new one. I don't trust much of anything and would still want to check the actual valve lift vs. crank position.
Old 08-08-2006, 11:57 PM
  #25  
Koenig928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Koenig928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darien Nunn
Louie,

Without having the CAM position "templates", I hope to get a good read with ken's tool. It should give me an idea if I'm way off or not..
Darien,

Might I suggest that you fine tune your cams first per the WSM, and find out exactly where they are set at before playing with the timing. I just did this to the Koenig motor last week (set the factory setting). It's kinda a PITA, but I've got the procedure fresh in my mind. The WSM's procedure seems a little confusing at first, but Big Dave's write-up made it very clear. (THANKS!)

I've got a dial indicator and stand you can borrow if you want. I have to redo mine still since I didn't have that bent indicator extension.

Let me know
Old 08-09-2006, 12:04 AM
  #26  
Koenig928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Koenig928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Louie928
I'm guessing the sprocket slots are mostly to account for differences in belt lengths. You always set timing with a used belt since it's different with a new one. I don't trust much of anything and would still want to check the actual valve lift vs. crank position.
Great point, Louie. Didn't think about that one, I used the new belt on my first try. I'll throw the old belt back on and redo it.

Darien,
Also, I forgot, you really don't need the cam templets. They're nice to have and will get you in the neighborhood, but the exact cam timing is done with the dial indicator.
Old 08-09-2006, 01:06 AM
  #27  
pmotts
Burning Brakes
 
pmotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Absolutely, might as well put it back together knowing everything is to spec.

Originally Posted by Koenig928
Darien,

Might I suggest that you fine tune your cams first per the WSM, and find out exactly where they are set at before playing with the timing. I just did this to the Koenig motor last week (set the factory setting). It's kinda a PITA, but I've got the procedure fresh in my mind. The WSM's procedure seems a little confusing at first, but Big Dave's write-up made it very clear. (THANKS!)

I've got a dial indicator and stand you can borrow if you want. I have to redo mine still since I didn't have that bent indicator extension.

Let me know
Old 08-09-2006, 03:25 AM
  #28  
SMTCapeCod
Race Car
 
SMTCapeCod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mechanochondriacism
Posts: 4,700
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Koenig928
The WSM's procedure seems a little confusing at first, but Big Dave's write-up made it very clear. (THANKS!)

Link for that?
Old 08-10-2006, 01:36 AM
  #29  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

i went the stock specs and the car ran poorly. matched both sides at a higher than specified , 2mm per side. it changed the exhaust note and I picked up some power. stock spec was 1.6 to 1.8mm on the setting side. Interesting the stock spec for the GT cams is more advanced and further advanced for the GTS, while the GT has the most desirable cam profile. (actually very close to the 85 cam, with a very subtle difference in lobe positions)

MK
Old 08-10-2006, 09:54 AM
  #30  
Darien
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,644
Received 241 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Mark,

Did you use the porken tool?? Not sure what 2mm, does that equate to deg?


Originally Posted by mark kibort
i went the stock specs and the car ran poorly. matched both sides at a higher than specified , 2mm per side. it changed the exhaust note and I picked up some power. stock spec was 1.6 to 1.8mm on the setting side. Interesting the stock spec for the GT cams is more advanced and further advanced for the GTS, while the GT has the most desirable cam profile. (actually very close to the 85 cam, with a very subtle difference in lobe positions)

MK


Quick Reply: Advance CAM Timing (who's done it?)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:57 AM.