Compression numbers (Inconsistent)
#18
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 65
From: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Darien-
Just saw this. Looks like there's overwhelming consensus to do the leak down.
You asked what the compression should be. Hard to say for sure. I have a HF compression tester that will read about 155-165, whereas my friends reads 180-190. The key is to look for consistency. You obviously do not have consistency. I'd re-do that entire bank just to make sure.
Just saw this. Looks like there's overwhelming consensus to do the leak down.
You asked what the compression should be. Hard to say for sure. I have a HF compression tester that will read about 155-165, whereas my friends reads 180-190. The key is to look for consistency. You obviously do not have consistency. I'd re-do that entire bank just to make sure.
#19
This was interesting to me:
Anyone know how that would happen?
But it could explain your #8.
Originally Posted by Wally Plumley
Bent valves typically result in near zero readings, burned valves in very low readings, bad rings may give anywhere from moderately low readings to higher than normal readings.
But it could explain your #8.
#20
Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
You asked what the compression should be. Hard to say for sure. I have a HF compression tester that will read about 155-165, whereas my friends reads 180-190. The key is to look for consistency. You obviously do not have consistency. I'd re-do that entire bank just to make sure.
#21
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,846
Likes: 340
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Darien Nunn
Ever seen numbers like these??
#1-150 #5-140
#2-155 #6-135
#3-147 #7-130
#4-155 #8-163
The engine was at operating temperature.
I know folks have had higher and lower numbers using different gauges, but #8 has me scratching my head
#1-150 #5-140
#2-155 #6-135
#3-147 #7-130
#4-155 #8-163
The engine was at operating temperature.
I know folks have had higher and lower numbers using different gauges, but #8 has me scratching my head
#23
I've heard that before, but not sure how I can have the throttle wide open with the throttle body removed
Originally Posted by Imo000
5 and 6 are a little on the lower side. The rest are within the +-10% acceptable range. But since you engine is boosted, the lower compression on those two cylinders is not that important. Did you keep the throttle at wide open during the compression test? You can get some low and inconsistent numbers if the throttle is closed.
#26
please!!!!
you go about 5-6 hits and any length of hose is a non issue.
my 84 with 176000miles on it was in the 120-130 range. my 5 liter part euro was in the 155 range, and the holbert S4 with 85 cams is 180 ish.
i wouldnt be so worried about #8, i would be worried about #7 at 135.
I would do the test again. could have had a loose compression tester fitting in the sparkplug hole. full throttle doesnt really matter, as the volume of air moving over time is small enough for the throttle idle hole to feed. however, you can get the max reading in less pumps.
Mk
you go about 5-6 hits and any length of hose is a non issue.
my 84 with 176000miles on it was in the 120-130 range. my 5 liter part euro was in the 155 range, and the holbert S4 with 85 cams is 180 ish.
i wouldnt be so worried about #8, i would be worried about #7 at 135.
I would do the test again. could have had a loose compression tester fitting in the sparkplug hole. full throttle doesnt really matter, as the volume of air moving over time is small enough for the throttle idle hole to feed. however, you can get the max reading in less pumps.
Mk
Originally Posted by sublimate
The compression reading will vary due to the volume of the hose of the compression tester since it is effectively adding volume to the cylinder. So a tester with a longer hose will give lower readings.