X-pipe = no no
03-21-2006, 03:34 PM
#76
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Fabio's right. Remember, it costs money to sue (although it appears he's a lawyer). Louie, no offense but, would he really be able to get much? Would it really be worth his while? Me thinks not. I would not worry much. Especially if other people are selling your wares (they're responsible unless you gave them direction to call it an X-pipe). To be safe, I think you could forward a note instructing your vendors to not use the term "X-pipe" in their marketing campaigns, and instead wither call it a Cross-over, X-flow, Ott-X, the cat's @$$, or whatever (depends on your marketing strategy). Then tell the guy you have complied with his request, then tell him to go suck a lemon!
Alternatively you could just ignore him and make crank calls to his cell phone every 3 minutes (I'll help). What a turd!
Alternatively you could just ignore him and make crank calls to his cell phone every 3 minutes (I'll help). What a turd!
03-21-2006, 08:20 PM
#79
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I did an internet search on the German alphabet.
It listed pronounciation of the letter "X" as 'ixx.'
Wonder how an Ixx-pipe sounds?
Browsing through his patent for the dual chamber exhaust, looks like
any dual pipe exhaust that has any merging may infringe on his "discovery."
So a dual pipe system going through a single cat or single muffler can may violate his patent if the merging is close to "coaxial" to the intake pipes. Sigh.
Ernest (NYC)
It listed pronounciation of the letter "X" as 'ixx.'
Wonder how an Ixx-pipe sounds?
Browsing through his patent for the dual chamber exhaust, looks like
any dual pipe exhaust that has any merging may infringe on his "discovery."
So a dual pipe system going through a single cat or single muffler can may violate his patent if the merging is close to "coaxial" to the intake pipes. Sigh.
Ernest (NYC)
