Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Dariens 86.5 Dyno Chart 347.47rwhp 369rwtq (questions)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2006, 12:46 AM
  #16  
ErnestSw
Rennlist Member
 
ErnestSw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about exhaust issues?
Old 02-17-2006, 12:48 AM
  #17  
Darien
Rennlist Member
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,649
Received 245 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim_H
You will.

Points & cap are fresh

Could a weak coil be the cause?

Jim,

The coils are the only things that I haven't replaced??
Old 02-17-2006, 12:49 AM
  #18  
Darien
Rennlist Member
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,649
Received 245 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ErnestSw
What about exhaust issues?

Exhaust is good, pretty much a straight shot
Old 02-17-2006, 12:50 AM
  #19  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

There was no pinging, not a sign of it at all. The kid running the dyno is pretty sharp as well, he would have said something. He has a very stock looking 10sec Ford Focus as his daily driver! I was manning the camera but only 15ft away..i would have heard it, especially if it was bad enough to cause that result.

I think it is gear related as the car "breathes and pulls" fine in 1st and 2nd gear. If you look at the chart things occured at the peak torque value. Dunno. If you want, Darren we can go over and do a run in 2nd gear to see if the same issue crops up...perhaps turn the BEGI bleed in another turn, unless you did that already?

See what feed back we get here first. Theres alot of dyno experience on hereand perhaps someone else has seen somehting similar?
Old 02-17-2006, 12:59 AM
  #20  
Jim_H
Banned
 
Jim_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have a couple of spare coils I could send if you want to try them. A run in second gear will confirm whether it's tranny related.
Old 02-17-2006, 01:58 AM
  #21  
Darien
Rennlist Member
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,649
Received 245 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim_H
I have a couple of spare coils I could send if you want to try them. A run in second gear will confirm whether it's tranny related.

Thanks for the offer I may take you up on it if the we run it in 2nd and it checks good.
Old 02-17-2006, 02:15 AM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

If you have rpms, you had a spark sensor. which means, the dynojet automatically adjusts for wheel and clutch slippage. Usually the "real" actual and internally adjusted are pretty close, within a few hp.
(not to be confused with actual and SAE runs) what we are talking about is the MPH vs HP compared to the rpm vs hp curves.

the fact that the power curve falls off so fast, is probalby related to lack of air flow out of the compressor. getting pressure inputs from the fall off point would confirm this.
Its not fuel related as the fuel is good to the end.

do the run in 4th gear, there is less of a chance of slippage, but 3rd shouldnt be an issue. i did 3rd gear a while ago, and we only lost 5-7hp due to the increased gearing.

if you had spark issues, you wouldnt be making 350hp!

Mk
Old 02-17-2006, 02:37 AM
  #23  
Darien
Rennlist Member
 
Darien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,649
Received 245 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
If you have rpms, you had a spark sensor. which means, the dynojet automatically adjusts for wheel and clutch slippage. Usually the "real" actual and internally adjusted are pretty close, within a few hp.
(not to be confused with actual and SAE runs) what we are talking about is the MPH vs HP compared to the rpm vs hp curves.

the fact that the power curve falls off so fast, is probalby related to lack of air flow out of the compressor. getting pressure inputs from the fall off point would confirm this.
Its not fuel related as the fuel is good to the end.

do the run in 4th gear, there is less of a chance of slippage, but 3rd shouldnt be an issue. i did 3rd gear a while ago, and we only lost 5-7hp due to the increased gearing.

if you had spark issues, you wouldnt be making 350hp!

Mk
Thanks Mark, If I ran it in 4th gear, wouldn't that be getting the mph up around 200, that could get a little scary
Old 02-17-2006, 02:43 AM
  #24  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

This chart shows the MPH vs RPM.

also..."how things work"
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/automa...smission10.htm
Attached Images  

Last edited by Tony; 02-17-2006 at 03:28 AM.
Old 02-17-2006, 09:33 AM
  #25  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darien Nunn
Timing is what the guy at the dyno thought as well, but I guess that's not adjustable.
Spark timing is not adjustable, but cam timing is. Hopefully one of you Vegas guys has one of PorKen's cam timing tools.
Old 02-17-2006, 10:32 AM
  #26  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

If it is an engine issue, rather than tranny issue, then check you have good manifold vacuum. The "load" info to the EZK is via a vacuum feed...... this might be the problem ?
Old 02-17-2006, 10:43 AM
  #27  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
If it is an engine issue, rather than tranny issue, then check you have good manifold vacuum. The "load" info to the EZK is via a vacuum feed...... this might be the problem ?
That's good information... By "load" do you mean as RPM's increase, so does the vacuum => thus the variable input for the EZK. Is this correct? If so, is there a descrete level of vacuum that is required or is it a relative measure?
Old 02-17-2006, 11:00 AM
  #28  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a similar looking dyno chart with a CBR 900RR a couple of years ago. They are also dual coil ign systems. We chased the problem for weeks. It would fall on it's face at 9000RPM, with that bizzare scattered tracing falling off the HP curve, just like what yours does. The only difference is that it showed in 3rd and 4th gear pulls. It did not show in 1st and 2nd, and wouldn't pull high enough in 6th. The dyno tech thought it looked a hung float bowl needle, except that the A/F numbers actually went a bit rich at the failure point. We rebuilt the carbs (4) to no avail. Turned out to be a bad ignition coil which, showed no test signs of failure. We only discovered it by switching coils in our last ditch efforts of parts swapping trials.
Old 02-17-2006, 11:00 AM
  #29  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Hi Andrew,
At idle - (low load) you have the highest manifold vacuum. As more air enters the engine, less and less vacuum.

This is fed to the early LH2.2 EZK as a measure of engine load.

If there's not vac to the EZK, you might think this would give the correct ignition advance for high load/rpm. .... but ofren things are not that simple, because the EZK ECU may be programmed to default to a "safe" igntion mapping with no vac.

I haven't analysed the LH2.2 EZK, so I don't know precisely what happens in that situation.

The later LH2.3 EZK (S4 and later) certainly backs of the igntion timmng if the load signal, knock signals or Hall signals are not as the EZK expects.
Old 02-17-2006, 11:15 AM
  #30  
MarkRobinson
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
MarkRobinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hi Darien, this looks like a classic belt slip, or blow-throught MAF charged pipe leak. If your drawing through the MAF (ala my turbo kit), and you have a boost leak somewhere (as I did 2x for 2 dynos so far), you'll have excessive fuel out the back pipe, but if you're loosing boost before the MAF, then the MAF will only calibrate for the air entering the motor & your fuel will be fine.

Your charts don't really look like an ignition issue, as your AF and power curves are smoother than what you'd see for a major ignition/detonation hiccup. I"d suspect belt slip and/or a leak somewhere.

Just for kicks, retard your timing 3d with the pigtail & put in a little race gas, see if the problem goes away. Check your plugs for spots on them as well: signs of mild/moderate detonation.


Quick Reply: Dariens 86.5 Dyno Chart 347.47rwhp 369rwtq (questions)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:38 PM.