Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

early blocks and later cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2006, 01:30 PM
  #1  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default early blocks and later cranks

I know I read about this in another thread but it was a tangent within a somewhat unrelated thread topic if I remember correctly which has left me searching in vain.

Wasn't there a change in the blocks early on that also involved a crank change making some early blocks incompatible with later cranks and aftermarket stroker cranks? What year blocks were these and how can they be identified? What exactly changed?

Is there a way to identify engine blocks by year? Not complete engines but bare blocks, isn't there a casting or ID number of some sort?
Old 01-29-2006, 01:36 PM
  #2  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I know with a 84 crank with the larger oiling holes vs the early crank with the earlier oiling holes, there is a subtle difference in the area of the thrust bearing area. dremmling the crank and block area just below the thrustbearing, will solve this issue. (or better, all on the block, but there is not that much material that needs to be removed.)

see the pics on the Scot engine build up and saga.
MK
Old 01-29-2006, 01:40 PM
  #3  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you Mark

So they didn't change the main bearing dimensions? All that has to be done is some minor clearancing on the block to accept any of the cranks?

Was that the only difference? No oiling or cooling changes to the block itself?
Old 01-29-2006, 01:47 PM
  #4  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

hmmm I thought it was a no-go
Old 01-29-2006, 01:54 PM
  #5  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thought what was a no go?
Old 01-29-2006, 02:03 PM
  #6  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

they all seemed the same. maybe someone that actual data can confirm. we did use the old style bearings that came on the 82 block, even though the 84 crank would use the single piece front main bearing other mains are the same, and i dont know the exact differences of the thrust bearing, but it all seemed to work fine

mk

Originally Posted by EB338
Thank you Mark

So they didn't change the main bearing dimensions? All that has to be done is some minor clearancing on the block to accept any of the cranks?

Was that the only difference? No oiling or cooling changes to the block itself?
Old 01-29-2006, 05:15 PM
  #7  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

old cranks and new blocks and also bearings etc. So a GTS crank will take '78 bearings and run fine in a '78 block?? SWEET.



Quick Reply: early blocks and later cranks



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:29 PM.