Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Thicker Head Gasket (Cometic)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2005, 05:55 PM
  #1  
CMW
Racer
Thread Starter
 
CMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thicker Head Gasket (Cometic)

Rennlisters,

As I have mentioned before my S/C set up is currently limited to about 5 PSI.
The 10.5 CR is something not to be taken lightly for longevity .

So we were asking about the thicker Cometic Head Gasket and if anyone here had any experience with it?

Also has anyone used the thicker Porsche Head gasket and to what effect?

Thanks,
Old 12-28-2005, 05:56 PM
  #2  
CMW
Racer
Thread Starter
 
CMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I should add that our goal is to lower CR to 10:1 IOT experiment with more boost and avoid any potential future pitfalls.
Old 12-28-2005, 06:08 PM
  #3  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

If you have the heads off might as well go with a set of low compression froged pistons, they are the best way to go to lowering the CR. They are alot stronger than the stock cast units and with them you can turn up the boost to at least 10psi. The thicker gasket is some what of a band-aid solution.
Old 12-28-2005, 06:15 PM
  #4  
mspiegle
Three Wheelin'
 
mspiegle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
If you have the heads off might as well go with a set of low compression froged pistons, they are the best way to go to lowering the CR. They are alot stronger than the stock cast units and with them you can turn up the boost to at least 10psi. The thicker gasket is some what of a band-aid solution.
I don't think we wanted to get that deep into it. Although that is probably the best solution.

Edit: So, where do we find some of those froggy pistons?
Old 12-28-2005, 06:18 PM
  #5  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,134
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I don't think using a thicker gasket to decrease CR is a good idea.
928 Quench/Squish Sensitivity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

as most of you may know (and I recently discovered), increasing head gasket thickness or increasing deck clearance on a quench designed motor can actually lead to increased detonation...some motor builders claim anything over .060" total squish (gasket & deck clearence) can SEVERELY INCREASE detonation....http://www.speedomotive.com/Building%20Tips.htm

potentially bad news for the stroker crowd trying to lower compression for a bit of extra FI HP...

this only leaves reducing the stroke/volume while keeping the same compresson ht or using a much larger dish (50cc) to lower compression for FI motors starting out at 10+:1 compression (strokers etc)....so much for just "slapping in" a lower compression ht piston....yep, even the angles count....

anyone know what the total squish/deck clearance limits are for the 928 or if it is squish sensitive?

as always, thx for any and all of your squishy/sensitive comments...
__________________


85Shark AT/Platinum
(updated 11/07/05)
Old 12-28-2005, 07:31 PM
  #6  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

We have used Cometic head gaskets with good results, no detonation on 10psi of boost. Using a .074 thick head gasket will drop compression by approx. 1/2 a point. There are tricks to making them seal though, contact us for a full explanation if you are interested.
Old 12-28-2005, 07:32 PM
  #7  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

When my heads were off this spring, I went with the thicker Cometic gaskets. IIRC, they were 2x the thickness of the regular gaskets--but they make a size or two even thicker than what I have on. I chose the thickest they warranted to still have the same clamping force as the standard one--any thicker, and they don't warranty the clamping force, because there's an additional layer.

I spent some time talking to one of the techs from Cometic as I was trying to determine the thickness I wanted. His ballpark estimate was that the CR would be reduced by about half a point, although I don't think that's terribly scientific.

I also figured this might be some additional protection against bending valves if I experienced TBF (again), but this too is very unscientific and probably incorrect. How far do the valves open when they open?

You should expect some weeping of the gaskets after they're installed for a couple heat cycles. This seems to be common. I don't have any problems with leaks.

I will say, however, that I think the car feels noticably slower, although I have not ever dynoed the car. One of these days I should probably do it... My digital boost gauge reads 9lbs of boost right now, but it only displays in whole numbers, so I'm not sure at what point it rounds up. Andy and I think conventional wisdom says it should make somewhere around 8 with the pulley I have on now.

Lastly, I will also point out that I used to have some tip-in knocking if I floored it from a stop. That problem completely went away with the thicker gasket.

I realize this conflicts with an earlier post re: quench/squish, but I'm just sharing my seat-of-the-pants real life experience.

Hard to believe that Cometic would last as long as they have and offer so many different kinds of thicker gaskets if this was such a no no. But I'm not an engineer.
Old 12-28-2005, 08:06 PM
  #8  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Brian - I think with the thickness you used, with was the 8x one Ithink, you went down more then half a point.

Turn up that boost!
Old 12-28-2005, 09:34 PM
  #9  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

To clarify, I think I used the 0.071 or 0.074 instead of the 0.045 that Cometic lists as stock.

Brendan, I'm not quite sure what you said, but I think I get the point. I have smaller pullies that I will install at some point. I need to get the car dynoed to establish some sort of a baseline with my current setup vs. what most other TS guys are getting, and then see whether any of the tradeoffs between higher performance and reduced longevity are still appealing.
Old 12-28-2005, 11:18 PM
  #10  
mspiegle
Three Wheelin'
 
mspiegle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info guys! This is sounding good...
Old 12-28-2005, 11:20 PM
  #11  
mspiegle
Three Wheelin'
 
mspiegle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about head bolts? Is there any reason to try something like ARP?

This all came about because the TB/WP needs to be done, and we figure we can make things "better" by throwing in thicker gaskets while-we're-in-there. Are there any other upgrades that help reliability and longevity?
Old 12-28-2005, 11:21 PM
  #12  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Used stock pistons would certainly be cheaper than new aftermarket. How close are GTS piston dimensions to S3, S4, or M28-45/46 pistons? Would a piston swap to readily available (or not as readily available M28-45/46) pistons be feasible?
Old 12-28-2005, 11:22 PM
  #13  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mspiegle
How about head bolts? Is there any reason to try something like ARP?
Somebody recently recommended against ARP bolts. I think the recommendation was made to Brendan.
Old 12-28-2005, 11:48 PM
  #14  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mspiegle
How about head bolts? Is there any reason to try something like ARP?

This all came about because the TB/WP needs to be done, and we figure we can make things "better" by throwing in thicker gaskets while-we're-in-there. Are there any other upgrades that help reliability and longevity?
Ahhhm, changing the head gasket during the WP/TB change is NOT a while we're-in-there procedure. The head gasket is nowhere near the t-belt. If that's all you are doing, I would leave the head gasket alone.
Old 12-28-2005, 11:49 PM
  #15  
a4sfed928
Pro
 
a4sfed928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Summerville SC
Posts: 595
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I was told to stay away from ARP because the stock bolts were designed to the expansion of the block ARP are not.


Quick Reply: Thicker Head Gasket (Cometic)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:58 PM.