Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 Racecar Exhaust X-Pipe or Y-Pipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2005, 04:21 AM
  #1  
TeufelHei
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
TeufelHei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea (the South one)
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 928 Racecar Exhaust X-Pipe or Y-Pipe?

I'm looking for some input on my race project.

Here's the stats:
Stock 16v US L-Jet Engine (Will get fresh rebuild/reseal)
Add Headers (TBD)
Add Adjustable RRFPR/Dampner
Long term forced induction plans

My understanding (limited) is that it is generally less restrictive to have a single larger pipe than a pair of smaller pipes due to reductions in contact area and an increase in usable flow diameter. Since I have a choice, and I will be running the absolute minumum restriction allowed for the track (only), which should I go for; a Y-pipe or an X-pipe?

Any advice on the headers? I've got a set of manifolds that look an aweful lot like the one's on my '85 Euro sitting on the shelf. Anyone know if there is a way to tell the difference? I'm not 100% on the car's history so it is not impossible that it had some parts swapped. The current exhaust is the ANSA replacement.
Old 06-17-2005, 11:50 AM
  #2  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Read Louis Ott's write up on exhaust sizes. IIRC, 2x2.5 and 1x3.5 flow about the same on the high end, but the duals have more low end torque and sound better.
Old 06-17-2005, 12:54 PM
  #3  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,110
Received 353 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

The way I've come to understand it, the duals extract better at lower rpms due to higher core gas speeds. From the center out, the speed of the gas slows down, so the larger pipe has less of a percentage of low speed gas.

The large single pipe may be lighter overall and fit better under the '81.
Old 06-17-2005, 01:22 PM
  #4  
Lagavulin
Three Wheelin'
 
Lagavulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Berlin
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
..low speed gas.
I get that sometimes.
Old 06-17-2005, 02:31 PM
  #5  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,947
Received 146 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Hmmm lets see, i run 3.5" single out of devek level 2 pipes. 293hp to the wheels out of an Ljet 5 liter euro, 243 hp out of a US (tired) 4.7 with only euro intake and cams, and now 335 rear wheel out of a 5 liter S4 with 85US cams.
sounds like that works well. And, there is something to be said for less mufflers and pipes to install and change if you need to change the db output

i think euro 85 manifolds are the same as US 84 and earlier manifolds. JUNK!

MK
Old 06-17-2005, 03:00 PM
  #6  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,331
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TeufelHei
My understanding (limited) is that it is generally less restrictive to have a single larger pipe than a pair of smaller pipes due to reductions in contact area and an increase in usable flow diameter. Since I have a choice, and I will be running the absolute minumum restriction allowed for the track (only), which should I go for; a Y-pipe or an X-pipe?
Just to confuse you further - my track BMW e30 320iS - 2000cm3 Italian market only 4-cylinder M3 engine - puts out 210bhp on the crank at 7500rpm. The same engine in race trim (Gruppe A) with sharper cams, CF intake and Alpha N puts out 330bhp on the crank at 9000rpm!!! That's 165bhp/litre in NA form...

What is interesting is that the exhaust shape and size stays the same - no matter whether you buy a street car or a Gruppe A monster. I have 2-into-1 and 2-into-1 equal length cast headers, then a H-shaped bridge between them and then a X-over, all original and made by BMW Motorsport GmBH. The diameter is 55mm all the way from the cylinder head to the back box...

Go figure about the presense of the H-shaped bridge, the X-over and the equal diameter of the downpipes? If it worked for the M3 - most wins for a single race car model ever. then...

P.S. You can see the H-shaped bridge on the LHS of the pic. The X-over follows immediately
Old 06-17-2005, 03:06 PM
  #7  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,947
Received 146 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

yes, stop worrying about improving max torque, its meaningless. its all about max hp and again, better said, max hp under the operational range. if you use our cars from 4500rpm to 6400rpm , then it really doesnt matter if you make a little more at 4000rpm. if you want more power at 4000rpm, downshift! driveability is different.
personally, ive never seen a loss in torque at max torque with any of the changes of headers, cat removal, larger exhaust sections, etc. worst ive ever seen is same torque peak, but more hp. usually, with headers for example, i saw 12hp gains and 12 ftlbs of torque gains too. added free flow exhaust, 12 more hp and 12 more ftlbs of torque. so, there goes that theory!.
mk
Old 06-17-2005, 03:10 PM
  #8  
Vlocity
Rennlist Member
 
Vlocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northwest, Ohio
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The other unsung advantage to a single pipe is there are less frictional losses.

Ken
Old 06-17-2005, 03:15 PM
  #9  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,267
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Single pipe will be lighter than the dual setup as well, which always helps a dedicated track car! For your car I would go with Devek Level 2 headers-custom Y pipe and single 3.5" all the way back, just enough mufflers as you need to reach the sound requirement....that plus a RRFPR should give you a nice HP gain!
Brian
Old 06-17-2005, 03:16 PM
  #10  
bcdavis
Drifting
 
bcdavis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looking at the exhaust on that BMW, I am reminded also, that my 280Z had a change in the factory heads, that yeilded quite a bit more horsepower. Know what it was? Square exhaust ports, versus round ones... Apparently the turbulence created from square tubing was less than with round... Not a very helpful or practical fact for a 928, but an interesting fact regardless...
Old 06-18-2005, 12:18 AM
  #11  
Daniel Dudley
Rennlist Member
 
Daniel Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For the early US spec cars, Borlas are popular. I hear the early manifolds are poor and that headers make the big gains. What is Jim Bailey running on his car? I have a european cat delete free flow on my 80. Car runs real nice for a US model. Particularly nice, but then that manual tranny has good gearing that makes the car feel real quick from 60 to 90.



Quick Reply: 928 Racecar Exhaust X-Pipe or Y-Pipe?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:02 PM.