Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

I'm sticking to my idea on turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2005, 12:40 AM
  #16  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SharkSkin
Brendan, that really does make the point very eloquently. Anyone out there feel like it dosn't get hot enough under the hood of your shark?
It only proves that turbo's get hot.

Yea, Audi has no clue what they were doing for 20+ years of making cars with the turbo right next to the head. Even Porsche must have been filled with a room full of morons that put the 944 turbo under the intake manifold. How about the holy grail of turbo cars – the Supra. Ever see where they placed the turbo’s? Guess Toyota has never seen pictures like that either. I guess they could make well over 900hp if they moved the turbo back 10 feet.



Old 05-16-2005, 01:28 AM
  #17  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Erik,

I've owned three turbocharged cars in the last 20 years and only one (80 Monte Carlo SS) did not have additional factory modifications to allow more air to the turbo. Guess which one wore out the turbo every 20K miles? Yep the Montie and it only ran at 7 psi boost. Putting the turbo in the rear will require some engineering to reduce lag time but it will increase the longivity of the turbo and all the under hood rubber parts.

Dennis
Old 05-16-2005, 04:02 AM
  #18  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
It only proves that turbo's get hot.
Right, VERY hot. And sharks get pretty hot under the hood too. Add a couple of red-hot lumps and you have a serious heat management issue. IMHO the point that was being made was, that's a LOT of heat to be putting under the hood of a shark, where there's no effin' room in the first place. Take the turbos out of that Stupe-ra and look at the size hole they needed to stuff them in there. Finding a way to bring all of that together into a shark is definitely not for the casual DIY 928 owner. It would take some real commitment to make a TT shark and make it streetable.
Old 05-16-2005, 05:27 AM
  #19  
drnick
Drifting
 
drnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

has anyone got a rear mounted system up and running?
Old 05-16-2005, 07:23 AM
  #20  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis Wilson
I've owned three turbocharged cars in the last 20 years and only one (80 Monte Carlo SS) did not have additional factory modifications to allow more air to the turbo.
I'm confused - what does a 951 have to allow for more air flow over or to the turbo that a standard 944 doesn't have?

Hey, I'm all for any setup that makes a 928 go faster. The rear mounted turbo just seams like a huge compromise. I’m sure with enough trial and error, you guys will figure it out.
Old 05-16-2005, 07:32 AM
  #21  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis Wilson
Actually it is the Audi 100LS short block not a truck engine. The same short block was used in the VW diesel.
I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.

I agree with HP, turbos mounted by the engine are better. The only true advantage to rear mounted turbos is ease of adapting non-turbo cars.
Old 05-16-2005, 08:43 AM
  #22  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Erik,

The 951 grill has extra venting for more air plus oil cooler and the turbo itself is is oil and water cooled.

Dennis
Old 05-16-2005, 09:05 AM
  #23  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

What venting? The only change is up front to push air through the intercooler. What turbo isn't either oil or water cooled? The 951 turbo is buried under the intake manifold. I'm not saying this is ideal, but it works for the 944's.
Old 05-16-2005, 09:11 PM
  #24  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Erik,

The 951 has extra cowling on the spoilier. Also air is deflected up over the radiator. Also, the 951 turbo is both water AND oil cooled. To put the same cooling on a 928 would require a lot of sheetmetal work and adaption of a 951 K27 or K28 turbo which is made for a smaller volume engine.

Dennis
Old 05-16-2005, 10:53 PM
  #25  
jyoon
Burning Brakes
 
jyoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 951 turbo is under the manifold to keep it farther away from the header and keep it running cooler, they last much longer than say a mitsubishi eclipse turbo which is attached to the manifold approximated 6 inches or so away from the engine. the mitsu turbo glows red when running and still works fine. it needs replaced more often than the 951 turbo, but it's so much easier to do. you could probably do it in 1/4 or less time than it takes to do the 951. imho mounting a turbo in the back seems extremely inefficient.
Old 05-17-2005, 10:21 AM
  #26  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Isn’t every turbo oil lubricated and water cooled? The oil is for the lubrication and the water line is more or less to cool the bearings a bit. I’ve never seen a turbo that only had one and not the other.
Old 05-17-2005, 10:47 AM
  #27  
tammons
Pro
 
tammons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Turbos in the back of the car is an interesting idea, but considering that no factory car has ever been built that way, should be a clue. You are going to end up with way too much lag and you still have to run an oil scavange pump. If you dont mind running a scavange pump, a better place is to mount a T4 low on the passenger side at the back of the engine. There is room there. Basically at the bottom of the engine straight down below the water tank. If you use a water cooled center section, that keeps the heat down and doubles the turbo life.
Old 05-17-2005, 10:54 AM
  #28  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Isn’t every turbo oil lubricated and water cooled? The oil is for the lubrication and the water line is more or less to cool the bearings a bit. I’ve never seen a turbo that only had one and not the other.
Some turbos are oil lubed and cooled. It doesn't seem to be very common anymore.
Old 05-17-2005, 11:16 AM
  #29  
chris0626
Rennlist Member
 
chris0626's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingDog
Some turbos are oil lubed and cooled. It doesn't seem to be very common anymore.
Actually MOST of the [aftermarket] turbo's you can find are oil-cooled only. After a hard run, most folks just idle the car to bring oil temps down (a couple minutes is all it takes). Water cooling will increase the longevity of the turbo bearing... although just exactly how much is anyone's best guess.

All this talk of underhood heat is pretty funny. Unless the car is driven to extremes, heat should NOT be an issue. Headers will get just as hot. You don't think superchargers generate any heat? Come on guys... If the car is moving there IS airflow, otherwise the engine wouldn't run.

FWIW: take for example my MR2... it's mid-engined AND turbocharged... no big front-mounted intercooler. Underhood temps get hot, but if your cooling system is up-to-snuff, not a problem at all. Guys are making over 700rwhp and cooling isn't even a concern.
Old 05-17-2005, 11:55 AM
  #30  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=tammons]Turbos in the back of the car is an interesting idea, but considering that no factory car has ever been built that way, should be a clueQUOTE]


There will be one on the Dyno saturday as well as a Twin turbo S4 and other types of HP adders!
Should be a fun day up n the PACNW!


Quick Reply: I'm sticking to my idea on turbos



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:26 PM.