Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

My GT Isn't a GT. Still Running Lean. Suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2005, 08:09 AM
  #1  
Daniel Dudley
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Daniel Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default My GT Isn't a GT. Still Running Lean. Suggestions?

Well I took my 89 GT to Musante Motorsports yesterday For some dyno runs. It was pulling about 275 RWHP but the air fuel was extremely lean over most of the lower rev range, at around 15 to 1. I'm open to suggestions as to why this would be. Now 275 is a respectable number, but further investigation reveals that my GT isn't a GT. It has an S4 engine and transmission. What really gets me is that I had a PPI by one of the big Porsche dealers who have a factory trained 928 mechanic and they told me to Absolutely buy this car as it was a rare 89 GT and worth the asking price. Ouch! Yes I have verified the engine and transmission as S4 myself, only too late. So caveat emptor boys and girls. I will be hooking the car up to a bosch hammer on the sixth of june, but in the meantime I don't want to drive it too much in a lean mode. The car has a K&N and Autothority chips, otherwise stock. On a positive note, I followed a real GT over to the dyno. He couldn't shake me at full throttle to 105. I just don't want to be doing that again until this problem is sorted out.
Old 05-05-2005, 08:32 AM
  #2  
Garth S
Rennlist Member
 
Garth S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,210
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

While I've never been convinced of any merits of a K&N vs a stock filter, why not try the latter?
If you do not have the stock chips to try, a set of GT chips can be readily had and inserted to replace the after market ones: I've put the GT EZK in my S4 with no ill effects - and have the LH unit to go in soon.
No, this will not make it a GT, but may provide a little boost in a safe A/F ratio zone.
Old 05-05-2005, 09:01 AM
  #3  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,052
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

What was the A/F at WOT ?
Old 05-05-2005, 09:28 AM
  #4  
Lagavulin
Three Wheelin'
 
Lagavulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Berlin
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel Dudley
It was pulling about 275 RWHP but the air fuel was extremely lean over most of the lower rev range, at around 15 to 1.
I'll bet your WOT switch is broke and your engine is running closed-loop.
Old 05-05-2005, 10:11 AM
  #5  
Jim_H
Banned
 
Jim_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry to hear that.

Maybe you have GT cams!

Originally Posted by Daniel Dudley
Ouch! Yes I have verified the engine and transmission as S4 myself, only too late. .
Old 05-05-2005, 12:38 PM
  #6  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,469
Received 200 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

True..keep the faith..perhaps the PO. had the block swapped but kept everything else. One way to tell is the idle speed..GT should be around 775...100 higher than the S4...at 675....The idle speed is tough to tell though.

Another one is the shape of the peaks on the torque curve. If the torque curve looks like double hump..with both humps being about the same size and height with the second peak just a bit taller....it may have GT cams. The GT makes maximum torque at around 4500 (second peak)...and the S4 makes the most torque at the low end (first peak) at 3500rpm..

What was the build date and vin of your car?....

EDIT..just read the post again..how do you know you don't have the GT tranny?....
later,
Tom
midlman@rennlist.net
89GT
Old 05-05-2005, 12:53 PM
  #7  
Jfrahm
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 0
Received 141 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

How do you measure AF on a dyno with cats? Do you have a wideband before the cats, or are you using the sample tubes? I would suppose cats thow off a tailpipe AF reading.

Last edited by Jfrahm; 05-05-2005 at 02:23 PM.
Old 05-05-2005, 12:55 PM
  #8  
Rich9928p
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Rich9928p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

The dyno HP looks good. As others have said, check the WOT switch. The next thing to check are the fuel injectors. Pull them and have the flow and spray pattern checked.
Old 05-05-2005, 01:08 PM
  #9  
morganabowen
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
morganabowen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Aztlan, aka SoCal
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Cool

Can't you recognize a GT from an S-4 by the VIN
Old 05-05-2005, 01:17 PM
  #10  
Cameron
Three Wheelin'
 
Cameron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,424
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Go and get your $250 back from the shop that did the PPI.
Old 05-05-2005, 02:18 PM
  #11  
Rich9928p
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Rich9928p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by morganabowen
Can't you recognize a GT from an S-4 by the VIN
No ... the 1989 GTs are determined by option code (M637 = GT) and engine type number M28/47. I think for model year 1990-91 all 5 speeds were GTs.
Old 05-05-2005, 03:15 PM
  #12  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,469
Received 200 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

In 89 as a rule of thumb....vins >1000 could be GT's....build dates starting in march of 89 are also an indication..as well as the others...engine number..tranny code, M637, CS rims etc..but as always with Porsche...plenty of exceptions to the rule...

later,
Tom
midlman@rennlist.net
89GT
Old 05-05-2005, 04:56 PM
  #13  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,930
Received 39 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Daniel,
Sorry to hear you thought you had a GT when in deed it's an S4. You have an M28/41 motor. Still a great car, but you paid a GT price.
Have Dave check the WOT switch and see if you can get yourself a set of stock chips. Run some fuel injector cleaner in the next few tanks.

A GT won't shake you until about 150
Old 05-05-2005, 06:25 PM
  #14  
Chuck Z
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chuck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Venice, FL
Posts: 3,782
Received 53 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
In 89 as a rule of thumb....vins >1000 could be GT's....build dates starting in march of 89 are also an indication..as well as the others...engine number..tranny code, M637, CS rims etc..but as always with Porsche...plenty of exceptions to the rule...

later,
Tom
midlman@rennlist.net
89GT
Actually, with more research I have come to the conclusion that the 89 GT probably started production with VIN 1100 and not 1000 as previously stated. I know it still says 1000 (at least until I get done typing this post) on my web site but the earliest I have is # 1107.
Old 05-05-2005, 06:54 PM
  #15  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Ours "was" (sold yesterday to a gentleman from Las Vegas) #1174. Most certainly a GT.


Quick Reply: My GT Isn't a GT. Still Running Lean. Suggestions?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:23 AM.