Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Cam Sprockets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2005, 01:43 PM
  #1  
jheis
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jheis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wine Country, CA
Posts: 1,168
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Question Cam Sprockets

I just picked up a set of '86.5 cam sprockets figuring to convert to the high torque (round tooth) timing belt the next time I do my '82. However, I now see that the part numbers for the 16v and 32v sprockets are different.

I know that the 32v sprockets are different to accommodate the distributor rotors, but is that the only difference? In other words, can the 32v sprockets be used on the early cars?

James
Old 02-26-2005, 01:42 AM
  #2  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,143
Received 384 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

The 32V cam gears (sprockets) bolt to a star shaped hub. The hub fits tightly over the cam woodruff key, as opposed to the 32V gear, which is slotted.

The hub and gear combination fit on the 16V camshaft, but the hub is too thick, so the gear sticks out too far.
...

I make a kit to convert to the 32V gear, which also lets you advance or retard the cam timing for more torque or horsepower. The kit includes machined hubs, and 'pointers' which correlate to the setup notch on the 16V gear.



Here's the manual, it might give you a better picture of the parts involved: (16V32VGearSetup2_0.pdf 513KB)

If you only want the HTD belt, then 83-84 gears are the ticket. The flat tooth belt is actually fine for the early cars, and not really worth the expense of changing all the gears - unless you want adjustability!
Old 02-26-2005, 09:37 AM
  #3  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,651
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

And don't forget that you've got to replace the crank gear and the one on the oil pump, too.

Hmmm... Maybe a daring person could get away without doing that.

Anyways, the "High Torque Design" is not entirely accurate as the belt itself is the same material. It's the teeth that were changed to be rounded instead of square. With my engineers hat on, (well, it's around here somewhere) I'm not sure that it is really any better.
Old 02-26-2005, 10:05 AM
  #4  
Garth S
Rennlist Member
 
Garth S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,210
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Glen is correct in that all four cogs are required - you cannot get away with less ( so don't take the dare ): the HTD belt will not mesh with the 'square' gears, even though the tooth spacing is identical. I've done a fairly complete conversion on an '80: full HTD with an '85 tensioner - so I can finish wiring in a "low belt tension" alarm.
You do need the '83-4 cam gears as Ken mentioned - unless you progress to his well designed system above.
Why HTD? - likely preference: there are more choices available and they seem to run quieter - I use an aftermarket HTD that has a further modified 'dimpled' tooth design that has yet to exhibit stretch/tension loss in either car.
Old 02-26-2005, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Dave H.
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dave H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle - it's not Hell, but you can see it from here!
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

less noise with the rounded belt/gears...
Old 02-26-2005, 02:56 PM
  #6  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,143
Received 384 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

HTD belt and gears are significantly quieter, especially if you don't have the covers on.

Standing over the engine and revving up to 5 grand was deafening with flat teeth. After converting, it was much, much quieter at high engine speeds, and at idle, I was scared to hear clicking - which was the fuel injectors!

Old 02-26-2005, 10:12 PM
  #7  
jheis
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jheis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wine Country, CA
Posts: 1,168
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thanks Guys:

Yes, I know you need all four gears, but the cam sprockets were the ones I had a question about and PorKen answered it pretty well.

Anyone need a pair of 32 valve cam sprockets cheap? PM me.

James
Old 02-26-2005, 10:20 PM
  #8  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you've already got the sprockets, get Ken's kit. You'll be able to adjust the timing of the two cams to match, so your engine will run smoother. You can also try to advance and retard them to adjust performance.
Old 02-26-2005, 10:26 PM
  #9  
jheis
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jheis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wine Country, CA
Posts: 1,168
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'll bite, how much for the kit?

James

Last edited by jheis; 02-26-2005 at 11:06 PM.
Old 02-26-2005, 11:52 PM
  #10  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The price went up since I bought mine, but it's still worth it in my opinion.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/181816-32v-cam-timing-tool-and-16v-32v-conv-group-buy-2-a.html



Quick Reply: Cam Sprockets



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:40 AM.