Lm-1/3 Wide band O2 logging
#32
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes
on
34 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well thanks to Z, I have taken the plunge and bought me a data loger setup. I now have Innovate's Aux Box on order. Should be here in a few days. I'll be posting here for additional tips and tricks. ![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Pretty amazing that this thread is almost 2 years old! Tony, you are a trail blazer!
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Pretty amazing that this thread is almost 2 years old! Tony, you are a trail blazer!
![bowdown](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bowdown.gif)
#35
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the dialogue Tony / Z. This thread should help with my initial set up process. I just have to connect the wiring for the LC-1 / LM-3 / TC-4 / XD-1 / and calibrate the O2 sensor and I think I'm ready for the first fire-up of my SuperModel install.
My SharkTuner is on the way as we speake (if you'll pardon the pun). Hopefully, I'll have the Innovate instruments functioning when it arrives, so that it'll just be a matter of installing the ST and plugging it into the Innovate system to get the re-mapping done.
I'll start posting some data-logs as soon as I get things happening. It'll be interesting to see the initial data and the initial A/F map, and to compare the initial data with the post-tuning numbers!
My SharkTuner is on the way as we speake (if you'll pardon the pun). Hopefully, I'll have the Innovate instruments functioning when it arrives, so that it'll just be a matter of installing the ST and plugging it into the Innovate system to get the re-mapping done.
I'll start posting some data-logs as soon as I get things happening. It'll be interesting to see the initial data and the initial A/F map, and to compare the initial data with the post-tuning numbers!
#36
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hello Brian,
Aren't you going to use the SharkTuner data logging when you receive it?
You can store the files for future reference, plot graphs etc.
Plus you can data log many variables not on the Innovate.....
Aren't you going to use the SharkTuner data logging when you receive it?
You can store the files for future reference, plot graphs etc.
Plus you can data log many variables not on the Innovate.....
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Of course I am going to use the logging capabilities of the Shark Tuner, John. Thing is, I 'll have to get the Innovate system working to the desired parameters first, since the ST uses the Innovate system as its WBO2 sensor. From reading the Innovate web-stie forum and the Tony / Z dialogue, getting the LM system set up might not be quite so straight forward as it could be. Also, the Innovate system can log some external parameters not monitored by the ST, like fuel pressure, boost, and temperatures.
This data, together with the ECU data straight from the LM unit will make for some very interesting observations about how the engine controller system works, under non-bost and boost conditions, both. I am very interested to see how the ECU deals with boost parameters in terms of injector duty cycle as a function of RPM and load and to see how the fuel pump keeps up with the demand, in terms of fuel rail pressure. It will be interesting to see if 6-10 lb of boost is testing the capacity of the OEM fuel pump, or not. It will also be interesting to see the temp responses through the intertcooler system, to determine whether the design capacity is actually sufficient.
Oh ya........ I'm a data ****, no doubt
!!!
This data, together with the ECU data straight from the LM unit will make for some very interesting observations about how the engine controller system works, under non-bost and boost conditions, both. I am very interested to see how the ECU deals with boost parameters in terms of injector duty cycle as a function of RPM and load and to see how the fuel pump keeps up with the demand, in terms of fuel rail pressure. It will be interesting to see if 6-10 lb of boost is testing the capacity of the OEM fuel pump, or not. It will also be interesting to see the temp responses through the intertcooler system, to determine whether the design capacity is actually sufficient.
Oh ya........ I'm a data ****, no doubt
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#38
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OK Brian, good points. I think inlet temp would be very good to monitor, and also pressure drops through the system.
What are the problems alluded to with the LM ?
What are the problems alluded to with the LM ?
#39
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm installingthe LC-1 (x2) and the DL-32 in my 1996 RUF 993tt and I have a question, the manual show how you can use the existing o2 sensor bung and use the analog output to feed the factory ecu the values it needs.
Have any of you guy done that... use the stuck bungs and use the LC1's analog out put to signal the ECU?
I will be logging:
Boost
Maf
tps
lateral G's
and RPM
any advise woud be great,,, the car is all torn apart right now! I gotta have her back together by tomorrow night,
kevin p (Ima2nr)
Have any of you guy done that... use the stuck bungs and use the LC1's analog out put to signal the ECU?
I will be logging:
Boost
Maf
tps
lateral G's
and RPM
any advise woud be great,,, the car is all torn apart right now! I gotta have her back together by tomorrow night,
kevin p (Ima2nr)
#40
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Cameron used the LC-1 simulated narrow band output and found it would be OK for a while and then act up.
He then had to go through the calibration process, and it would work for a while lomger, and then go crazy again.
He then had to go through the calibration process, and it would work for a while lomger, and then go crazy again.
#41
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I used the Tech Ege 2CO wide band "Narrow band sim" output to feed the NB O2 sensor input on my '87 S4. That worked fine for several months and a few thousand miles. I reverted back to the standard NB sensor only because I was done tuning and needed the WB for something else.
The Innovate should work to do the same. I have heard of some unusual problems, but that could have been due to something unrelated to the Innovate unit itself.
The Innovate should work to do the same. I have heard of some unusual problems, but that could have been due to something unrelated to the Innovate unit itself.
Originally Posted by Ima2nr
I'm installingthe LC-1 (x2) and the DL-32 in my 1996 RUF 993tt and I have a question, the manual show how you can use the existing o2 sensor bung and use the analog output to feed the factory ecu the values it needs.
Have any of you guy done that... use the stuck bungs and use the LC1's analog out put to signal the ECU?
I will be logging:
Boost
Maf
tps
lateral G's
and RPM
any advise woud be great,,, the car is all torn apart right now! I gotta have her back together by tomorrow night,
kevin p (Ima2nr)
Have any of you guy done that... use the stuck bungs and use the LC1's analog out put to signal the ECU?
I will be logging:
Boost
Maf
tps
lateral G's
and RPM
any advise woud be great,,, the car is all torn apart right now! I gotta have her back together by tomorrow night,
kevin p (Ima2nr)
#42
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've run the Innovate unit in my 928 for almost 4 years now. (I also sometimes run another 4 channel datalogger that is laptop based to supplement the Innovate data.) I run it in lieu of the stock NBO2 sensor and have no output probs with the NB emulator function.
I have had one "open cell" issue, which a quick off-throttle reboot corrected. But I have heard stories where that can be more frequent.
YMMV,
Greg
I have had one "open cell" issue, which a quick off-throttle reboot corrected. But I have heard stories where that can be more frequent.
YMMV,
Greg
#44
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Crap! I just ordered the LC-1 as part of the XD-16 stand alone kit, I was hoping to use it and the WB sensor that comes with it and replace my stock NB O2 sensor since I suspect it may be malfunctioning.
So should I install a second bung and only use the LC-1 wide band set up for the AF gauge and replace the suspect sensor with another NB sensor to feed the computer?
There isn't a whole lot of room in the H pipe to put another bung in but I could probably do it, the hard part would be putting it in next to the existing one to keep the body of the sensor upstream of the heat flowing off the pipe...I'm guessing that might make a difference.
By the way, excellent thread, I'm learning lots from you guys!
So should I install a second bung and only use the LC-1 wide band set up for the AF gauge and replace the suspect sensor with another NB sensor to feed the computer?
There isn't a whole lot of room in the H pipe to put another bung in but I could probably do it, the hard part would be putting it in next to the existing one to keep the body of the sensor upstream of the heat flowing off the pipe...I'm guessing that might make a difference.
By the way, excellent thread, I'm learning lots from you guys!
#45
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes
on
34 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by aggravation
So should I install a second bung and only use the LC-1 wide band set up for the AF gauge and replace the suspect sensor with another NB sensor to feed the computer?
![surrender](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/surrender.gif)