Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

16V L-Jet supercharger updates? Anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2004, 06:28 PM
  #1  
rjtw
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
rjtw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Altos CA
Posts: 1,009
Received 65 Likes on 51 Posts
Default 16V L-Jet supercharger updates? Anyone?

OK, I can't stand it anymore. I've been waiting and waiting for updates on a supercharger application for my '83. I know Carl has a kit for the earlier CIS cars which should work (but hasn't yet been installed?) on an L-Jet car, and Andy and Tim are working on solutions for the L-Jet cars like mine.

Updates anybody? How is it all coming along?



PS Did anybody note the new smog law Schwarzenegger signed the other day? Looks like I won't get to retire the smog-related equipment when my car is 25 years old after all...

Thanks guys, and keep up the GREAT work!!
Rick
Old 10-02-2004, 12:26 AM
  #2  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yea me too what up with 16v SC. Tim chime in here..............
Old 10-02-2004, 01:44 PM
  #3  
John Struthers
User
 
John Struthers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 3,291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Chirp...chirp...
ME TOO!
I have resumed saving in a separate account for the surgery.
Seems like there are minor glitches with the stock head gaskets.
Though I, erroniously, believed that all the SC crew was installing the metal re-inforced gaskets.Can you fellow 16v guy's see any other issues.
Like:
Compression ratio vs boost PSI.
Gauges and their placement.
Arm 1 install.
Regulator issues.(Rising rate -is it needed-)
Fuel supply -pump-.
Injector swap -if needed-.
While, personally, I don't expect to see more than a 70 - 90 HP gain I think that would be more than enough to continue terrorizing the local Mustang's -even the 05's- in most situations and perhaps I can hang onto a WRX off the line and mid-range making the high speed pass on them significantly sooner.
Old 10-02-2004, 01:57 PM
  #4  
Tres
Instructor
 
Tres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I Second that, or should I say I fourth it. Any ways, I would like to get a few extra HP out of my 82. I would love to see a dyno on it as well.
Old 10-02-2004, 11:58 PM
  #5  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi John,
Yea 100 hp is a-lot and i wouldn't push any more. The stock L-Jet injectors are 24 lbs at 40 psi. So the stock inj will flow enough fuel once an AFPR has been installed. Our CR is 9:1, it seems 9 psi = 100 hp and the head gasket holds. The limitation is the AFM. This winter I was converting to an MAF. Spilt Second has the software and signal condition box. I'll use a Ford MAF.
I'm also running a Borla single exhaust with no cat. Good up to 320 HP. Just need the 85' SS exhaust manifolds to compleat the package. So I figure another $2000.00 on top of the cost of the SC kit......... These mods should put me at 340 flywheel HP.......
Old 10-03-2004, 12:08 AM
  #6  
ViribusUnits
Nordschleife Master
 
ViribusUnits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 9,010
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Talk to Mark about the AFM.

I have second hand accounts of the AFM flowing enough air for 300 hp.

One possible way to modify the EFI system is to change the fuel pressure regulators for a later S4 or GTS regulator. The later engines use higher fuel pressures.

Once you've got the fuel pressure up, you have to shorten the injector pulse length to lean out the mixture so the engine will run. You can do this by tightening up the main spring on the AFM.

For this to work properly, you should have the AFM on the non-boosted side of the intake. Quick Carl says there is no need, but the math just doesn't seem right to me.

With a supercharged engine, the restriction caused by increaseing the tension on the main spring shouldn't be a problem.

Finaly, for 100 additional hp, you'd need about 6.7 psig of boost. You should almost be able to get that much boost unaftercooled on pump gasoline and no reduced timeing. However, an afterooler would allow you far greater flexability with your timeing curve, and fuel octane selections. Not to mention, an aftercooler would allow you MUCH greater flexability if you wanted to increase the hp additionaly.

Good luck.

PS, I keep wanting to build a supercharger. However, I'm broke, which is why I'm selling my car. I don't guess anyone would be intersted in paying me to suprecharge my car as a test case? And then useing the experence learned on my car to supercharge their own? Or something like that. Anyways, me and my wishful thinking.

Last edited by ViribusUnits; 10-03-2004 at 12:50 AM.
Old 10-03-2004, 07:19 AM
  #7  
John Struthers
User
 
John Struthers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 3,291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TOOFAST,
I never bothered reading the MAF conversion post(s) I think someone else was doing the same over the last 3 years.
I thought bolting in a late model engine computer/brain/4 speed auto would be just as cheap in the long run in our collective search for more HP. Sorry!. I will go back and read the posts and replies for reference.
I have my old JEGS catalog worn to the point that it just opens to the appropriate pages now, MAF/controllers/injectors/pumps software. If I ever get a little ahead of the cashflow game and get off my dead butt I want to strip a late model, HiPO, Mustang 5.0 or 4.6 pump /injectors/fuel rails/regs/brain/MAF out and see if it can be grafted to the shark 4.5's. Reason being is that if it works there will be a virtually endless supply of computor/brain/fuel system parts for our sHARKs as opposed to the limited number of Porsche parts remainig on the planet for the surviving 928' over the next 20 years or so. Concours be damned (no offence intended), these cars need to be driven!
I was going off of the 5-8 psi boost numbers for durability but -**** that I am- 100hp at a controlled 8 -10 psi sounds interesting.
VU,
Give it up!
Start collecting soda and beer cans...anything to keep the sHARK and finally give it the extreme going over you know it needs.
And yeah, I see what you are saying but I'm back to the Mustang system because I don't want a one-off system haunting me down the road. The stock stang' system is programmable for pulse amongst other things and the mapping software already exsits. Like Lionel Ritchie sings: I'm easy...
Old 10-03-2004, 10:13 AM
  #8  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

John,
I agree with you were are we going to be in 10 years as far as parts availability. But nothing's easy about installing an engine wire harness. Does the Ford MAF use a cam signal input? How would you pick up that signal. The L-jet distib RPM signal is not compatable to the Ford EFI. Theirs always speed density............
Old 10-04-2004, 03:18 AM
  #9  
John Struthers
User
 
John Struthers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 3,291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TooFast,
I believe it's a Tach signal input. This is just a thought at this stage ...but I think it can be worked out.
Harness grafting is just another obstacle -hoping to luck out with a simple jumper solution-.
Old 11-13-2004, 09:39 AM
  #10  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any news? Dyno test?
Old 11-14-2004, 11:44 AM
  #11  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I placed a post about 3 weeks ago that I was installing our kit on the L-Jet.

I am finishing it ( I hope) today and should dyno it this week.

It includes supercharger at 6 psi, dual-adjustable FMU, stainless steel braided fuel lines with anodized AN fittings, auxiliary cooling fans, air/fuel and boost gauges, a-pillar gauge pod for them, and complete pictorial installation instructions. I have it priced at $4,495.00 complete - and I mean COMPLETE down to every wire and nut and bolt needed.

We did have it running this week, but the car developed a problem unrelated to the SC kit and we did not get it to the dyno.

I'll post a few pictures as soon as I download them off me camera...
Old 11-14-2004, 04:07 PM
  #12  
John Struthers
User
 
John Struthers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 3,291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Smile

TooFast,
Thanks for the prompt!
Carl,
Be still my heart...
Currently, negotiating the sale of my first born son.
However, my wife, who keeps a garbage can lid and baseball bat
on hand for even simple greeting of the day conversations with our daughter
has demanded that the kids be sold as a set...
This may reduce their overall sale price significantly
In the mean time I am $800.00 closer in the "hidden" account.
We await the performance result numbers ...
P.S.
This won't affect my 21 mpg road mileage will it?
Old 11-14-2004, 05:03 PM
  #13  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

John S - I will get them to you (and everybody) as fast as I can.
I had to stop today - I am one fuel-fitting adapter away from being able to drive the Supercharged L-Jet again. I did not lkike the way the FMU was routed, wanted to route it a "better" way... now I have to hunt for an adapter in the morning. Sorry for the delay.
Old 11-15-2004, 07:48 PM
  #14  
John..
Three Wheelin'
 
John..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, you can do MAF on that setup without issue. People on here told me it wasn't possible, but I have two examples of it working quite well already. It uses a custom MAF and signal intercept.

Why not consider turbocharging? 5 to 7 lbs on that engine with twin turbos and you will outrun a CS setup pushing more boost. Keep in mind you drive say between 3000 and 6000 RPM on the street when the hammer is down, and the turbo can make all its boost there with the least draw on the engine. The only supercharger that can do that is positive displacement and you pay a healthy HP penalty to drive it. The CS comes up short of making full boost until you hit redline....infinite lag regardless of what anybody on here tells you. The end result is a wider powerband and a faster car. It is mathmatical fact and can't be disputed. Look at my dyno sheets and you will see the difference. 385 ft-lbs on 12 psig and 350+ ft-lbs on 8 psig, both intercooled....and this was with the "emissions" 80-82 camshafts on a 4.5 liter. I fully expect my Callaway to brush 400 RWHP once I have the euro cams installed.

You want to build your own system I can supply you with part of it or all of it. Manifolds are a good start and I will have them available for purchase very soon. Yes it costs more than a CS, but it will also perform better in the real world. Unfortunately I can't match the price of the low end CS units, but you get so much more with a turbo system.

Best part is when you lift the lid, she will look stock.
Old 11-15-2004, 09:45 PM
  #15  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John..
Why not consider turbocharging? 5 to 7 lbs on that engine with twin turbos and you will outrun a CS setup pushing more boost. Keep in mind you drive say between 3000 and 6000 RPM on the street when the hammer is down, and the turbo can make all its boost there with the least draw on the engine. The only supercharger that can do that is positive displacement and you pay a healthy HP penalty to drive it. The CS comes up short of making full boost until you hit redline....infinite lag regardless of what anybody on here tells you. The end result is a wider powerband and a faster car. It is mathmatical fact and can't be disputed.

You want to build your own system I can supply you with part of it or all of it. Manifolds are a good start and I will have them available for purchase very soon. Yes it costs more than a CS, but it will also perform better in the real world. Unfortunately I can't match the price of the low end CS units, but you get so much more with a turbo system.
Some quotes from various previous threads:

Originally Posted by John..
With the G-Tech, I got the following results:

0-60: 5.5 sec
1/4 Mile: 13.6 @ 114 MPH.
Originally Posted by Quick Carl
I got my 78 928 out for the first time since installing the supercharger on it. Before I put it away for the winter, I took some measurements: 1/4 mile in 16.2 seconds and 196 horsepower. Now, same car, same exhaust system, ignition system, driver, weight, EVERYTHING, (even the same measuring devices), recorded a 1/4 mile in 13.6 sec and 320 horsepower. My 0-60 time was 4.98 seconds.
Originally Posted by John..
For the record, my car can do 0-60 in 5.5 and mid 13 seconds at over 113 MPH. I would assume Carl's is faster down low because of available boost in 1st gear.
Originally Posted by John..
Personally, I don't think 1/4 mile times are all that effective at estimating HP of a turbocharged car. Typically you don't get full boost until 2nd and 3rd gear, so the results may be somewhat skewed.
Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
One of our customers had a Callaway blew the engine and replaced it with an S-4 engine with cams , he said it was much faster after the swap . It now has a GTS engine with GT cams and is faster yet . Point being , it was not making big power just big reliability problems with the turbo . Can it be done ? certainly . Is it simple and inexpensive ? not if done correctly . Marc Thomas ( who truely does recognize what the project requires ) lists $4,500 for just some of the parts and it is a complete engine rebuild as well before addressing the fueling requirements ! Anything less is going to require limited boost and major compromises . Turbo engines with the increased exhaust restrictions often have the headers/manifold so hot it is glowing cherry redhot . Which is a big issue under the hood of a 928 deciding which items you wish to barbeque . Will it be the motor mounts , undercoating , plastic radiator tanks , clutch fluid hose A/c compressor ......or all the above .
Carl's prices are listed at:
928 Motorsports supercharger kits

Originally Posted by John..
I believe I can offer the entire Twin Turbo package for $9280.00
No wonder there's a smile at the end of that last one. It is pretty funny John.


Quick Reply: 16V L-Jet supercharger updates? Anyone?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:14 PM.