Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Koni vs Bilstein?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2004, 09:28 PM
  #1  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default Koni vs Bilstein?

Looks like I may be taking a shortcut on getting my "new" but very tired 78 on the road when I get it back here (BTW - a PUBLIC thanks to both Stan SHaw and David Lloyd for thier gracious and unerring help in trying to get this car back to San Diego from CT - Thanks guys).


The situation that the car is in mechanically will need immediate shocks so that I can at least drive the car. That means I will probably put my bilstein/eibach/front-onthe-rear kit onto this car and buy something else for my 89S4 "CS/RS/SC" project.

Koni coilovers with hypercoil (linear) or Bilsteins with eibach (Progressive)?

Koni with eibachs?

I will be using drop links, poly bushings in upper and lower Front A arms and some poly in the rear sway bar mounts (see other thread)


Any BTDT? I can handle a hard riding car. There will be 18" hollow spoke Turbo twists as well.

Thanks
Old 07-02-2004, 09:56 PM
  #2  
Tommy928
Instructor
 
Tommy928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 193
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have Bilstein and Eibach. They ride well on smooth surfaces but turn nasty on bumpy roads, too bouncy - not enough rebound control. If I buy Bilstein again I would have them revalved 15-20% stiffer on rebound especially on the rear.

I have Koni Sport on my other cars and they work much better than the Bilstein on my 928.

I too have 18" wheels on my 928 and the ride is firmer on sharp bumps but otherwise no change from 16". Actually my 18" rides smoother than my 16", different tires probably account for the differences.
Old 07-02-2004, 10:35 PM
  #3  
Paul D
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Paul D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Endwell, New York
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went the Eibach/Koni (internally adjustable rebound) route. When I first installed them I set the Konis to full soft. The rear felt really bouncy after a heavy compression. It felt like it wanted to jump off the ground. I then disassembled the coilovers and stiffened up the rebound to 80% max on front and 60% max on the rears. I like it a whole lot better on street and track. Car (especially the rear end) stays planted. If you want ride height adjustability with the Konis you will need to buy the threaded sleeves and adjustment nuts. I bought used ones for all 4 corners. Good Luck!
Old 07-02-2004, 10:57 PM
  #4  
Scott M.
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Scott M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Penn State
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Koni/hypercoils think race car. Externally adjustables are highly prefered (and costly)

Bilsteins/Eibachs think Autocross, semi firm street.

With a lightened car such as yours (will be some day - ) plan on a modified spring rate like you mentioned, front springs to rear...

What is your intended use for the 89? That, to me, is the deciding factor.

Check w/ Mark from Pensicola (slow traffic move right windshield banner), I sold him a set of internally adj Koni's/old skool Eibachs fornt and rear. I heard he my not need 'em.

Scott
80 Euro track turd 2575 lbs
Old 07-03-2004, 04:09 AM
  #5  
Erik - Denmark
Burning Brakes
 
Erik - Denmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bredan,
I have 2 almost new rear Billstein shocks for sales for low price (half)
Thay are good for fast driving, but very bumpy in towns
Now I have Koni Gas, much better
Regards from Erik in Denmark



Quick Reply: Koni vs Bilstein?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:35 AM.