Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Uro part vs. Porsche

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2024, 07:07 PM
  #31  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,834
Received 892 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

"[QUOTE=URO Support;19549281]Hi guys, our product development team has been watching this thread, but unfortunately there aren't enough 928's for expansion tank 928 106 256 03 to pencil out. We definitely appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts though; we'll update you if anything changes."

That is what I was told when I tried to talk you guys into making the S3 intake tubes.
Who ever does your calculations on sales potential has there math screwed up.
How can you make parts for the 87 to 91 cars that we sell very little of then say you can't make an expansion tank that fits all 928's from 78 to 95.
There are 40,000 plus 928's out there and parts are coming to the end of there life rapidly. You should reconsider.
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






The following 3 users liked this post by ROG100:
Darklands (07-19-2024), hacker-pschorr (07-17-2024), Lawrencejuliano (07-17-2024)
Old 07-17-2024, 07:17 PM
  #32  
Lawrencejuliano
Rennlist Member
 
Lawrencejuliano's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Posts: 41
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hacker-pschorr
I wouldn't have an issue paying $500 for the correct part if it was the same quality as the original. Sadly the new Porsche units don't seem to be all that great either.
That’s exactly why I can’t stomach paying $500 for it, from what I’ve read the metal sleeves fail and they seep.
Old Yesterday, 09:08 PM
  #33  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,160
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by URO Support
Engineering is investigating the cracked 1075000149 tank, and will be heat/cool/pressure cycle testing units from current inventory.
This seems to have been the original problem. The central column separated so the tank was able to expand too much.

Check your tanks! There should be no gap between the center cone things. If there is the tank will bulge and fail.

(Mine has about a 1" gap! BTW, my temp repair failed after a few heat cycles, but it got me home. )


Last edited by PorKen; Yesterday at 09:14 PM.
Old Yesterday, 10:06 PM
  #34  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,833
Received 723 Likes on 579 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
This seems to have been the original problem. The central column separated so the tank was able to expand too much.

Check your tanks! There should be no gap between the center cone things. If there is the tank will bulge and fail.

(Mine has about a 1" gap! BTW, my temp repair failed after a few heat cycles, but it got me home. )
Ken,

Did the centre post thing split due to pressure or was it like that from day 1?


Old Yesterday, 11:31 PM
  #35  
Kevin in Atlanta
Rennlist Member
 
Kevin in Atlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,123
Received 808 Likes on 485 Posts
Default

Greg Brown has had new Porsche coolant tanks fail.
Old Yesterday, 11:38 PM
  #36  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,160
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
Did the centre post thing split due to pressure or was it like that from day 1?
The darker ring in the middle is a raised section. I imagine it was supposed to be (ultrasonically?) melted to join the two columns and wasn't? I recall noticing a couple of months ago the cap looked like it was off at an angle, but I convinced myself I was seeing things.
Old Yesterday, 11:42 PM
  #37  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,160
Received 395 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
Greg Brown has had new Porsche coolant tanks fail.
Who?

The new Porsche tank I put in my '88 leaked pretty quickly at the cap holder base. That was a thing for a while I think.
Old Today, 08:52 AM
  #38  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,833
Received 723 Likes on 579 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
The darker ring in the middle is a raised section. I imagine it was supposed to be (ultrasonically?) melted to join the two columns and wasn't? I recall noticing a couple of months ago the cap looked like it was off at an angle, but I convinced myself I was seeing things.
I am assuming the gap is the effect of the tank "ballooning" as it were.

Presumably the tank is blown in two halves and then fused together.
Old Today, 09:55 AM
  #39  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,830
Received 245 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
This seems to have been the original problem. The central column separated so the tank was able to expand too much.

Check your tanks! There should be no gap between the center cone things. If there is the tank will bulge and fail.

(Mine has about a 1" gap! BTW, my temp repair failed after a few heat cycles, but it got me home. )

If the center posts are actually welded on a new tank, is it open in the center to where a bolt or threaded rod with nuts and washer could be installed to relieve pressure from the weld?



Quick Reply: Uro part vs. Porsche



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:47 PM.