Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Boost, head gaskets and bmep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2007 | 12:31 AM
  #61  
mark kibort's Avatar
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29,956
Received 177 Likes on 67 Posts
From: saratoga, ca
Default

good point. its probably the denonation in a cylinder or two that you cant hear where are running either near stoich or just happen to have the temps and pressures to ignite the intake/fuel charge. we all are so trusting of the dyno sensors for A/F and, even more importantly, trusting of the averaging of the sensor for all 8 cylinders out the tail pipe or header! I dont think having individual EGT sensors is that bad of an idea for the boosted crowd.

Mk
Originally Posted by Imo000
That's a good point.

Here's what I think. If the volume of air is the same in both the stroker and the boosted engine that its probalby the intake air temperature that makes al the difference. OR maybe that the N/A engien can eaiser controll the A/F ratio.
Old 06-21-2007 | 12:44 AM
  #62  
123quattro's Avatar
123quattro
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Farmington Hills, MI
Default

Boosted cars eat head gaskets on a much more regular basis than large displacement engines. The edge between max power and knock is much finer. When knock occurs, in cylinder pressure goes through the roof, that along with the accompanying temperature melts whatever is the weakest link.

Most of the boosted 928s probably aren't running stand alone controllers, so the tendancy towards knock under load is increased due to not fully optimized control. Thus, more wasted head gaskets. This is mostly related to running too much (or sometimes zero) ignition advance rather than not enough fuel.
Old 06-21-2007 | 08:07 AM
  #63  
special tool's Avatar
special tool
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: limbo....
Default

Because I have built about 10 different engine configurations on my 944, I have gone back and forth on this.
My final decision is that BMEP (WITH PROPER COMBUSTION), will not lift/push headgaskets.
Knock does it.
My problem was that there are so many potential causes of knock, you have to prevent ALL of them.
The mls gasket on my car is viton coated and has been installed 3 times.
It is 100% leak free.
I run 20 psi on 93 pump (even in 5th gear to 7200 rpm)
This is with a turbo larger than probably ANYONE runs on a 944.
My car is extremely modified, but the block/head union is stock, so its relevant here.
On c16 I will run over 30 psi at Lebanon Valley dragway (7/11) and on the dyno it will be between 600 and 650 at the wheels.

I will say that the sneakiest thing I had to track down was reversion - exhaust gas will light you off early, I dont care if you have 1000000 octane fuel. Obviously this is turbo only.
Those wth stock cams dont have to worry about this one - there is no overlap.
2 valve heads are particularly prone.
Old 06-21-2007 | 08:47 AM
  #64  
JEC_31's Avatar
JEC_31
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by special tool
...
My final decision is that BMEP (WITH PROPER COMBUSTION), will not lift/push headgaskets.
Knock does it.
My problem was that there are so many potential causes of knock, you have to prevent ALL of them.
...

+111
Old 06-21-2007 | 09:34 AM
  #65  
Vilhuer's Avatar
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,384
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 35 Posts
From: Helsinki, Finland
Default

Originally Posted by special tool
The mls gasket on my car is viton coated and has been installed 3 times.
It is 100% leak free.
What company made it, who sells them, what bore sizes and thicknesses are available?
Old 06-21-2007 | 10:00 AM
  #66  
SwayBar's Avatar
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,604
Received 358 Likes on 244 Posts
From: Chicago Bears
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
its probably the denonation in a cylinder or two that you cant hear where are running either near stoich or just happen to have the temps and pressures to ignite the intake/fuel charge. we all are so trusting of the dyno sensors for A/F and, even more importantly, trusting of the averaging of the sensor for all 8 cylinders out the tail pipe or header!
Mark brings up a good point regarding the averaging of the 8 cylinders into 1 A/F reading, because that's exactly what it is, an average reading of 8 cylinders.

Because of the differing runner lengths of the stock S4 intake manifold which was done to broaden the torque curve for a street car, at any given RPM, every cylinder will have a different A/F ratio than any other cylinder; there will be varying degrees of leanness and richness.

Looking at high RPM, all else being equal, the cylinder with the shortest intake runner will fill it's cylinder with the most air. The problem is, since the stock fuel computer doles out the same amount of fuel to each cylinder, that short-runner cylinder at high RPM will be the leanest. Likewise, the longest runner at high RPM will be the richest, etc.

For a stock car this is not a bad thing since one assumes that the fuel maps were created by the factory to compensate/compromise. However, for a modified engine, whether stroked or blown, this issue is exacerbated when using the stock fuel maps since the volumetric efficiency of the engine has radically changed.

How does one get around this conundrum using the stock intake?
Originally Posted by mark kibort
I dont think having individual EGT sensors is that bad of an idea for the boosted crowd.
This is a good idea, but the problem with EGT sensors is that their response time is very slow. A better solution would be wideband O2 sensors on every cylinder whose reponse is nearly instantaneous. Better yet, one can have the EGT's in conjuction with the WB O2's.

But that alone does nothing but allow one to simply observe what's going on with the engine. Using those individual WB O2 sensors with an aftermarket fuel computer would allow precise fueling for each cylinder individually, regardless of what RPM each cylinder reaches is peak volumetric efficiency.

This would be more practical for the centrifugal crowd since the stock intake manifold scales well with more boost. On the other hand, the stock intake does not scale well at all for the stroker motors, and independent throttle bodies appear the hot ticket.

Just like anything, all one needs is time and money!
Old 06-21-2007 | 10:34 AM
  #67  
John Speake's Avatar
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,055
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Cambridge England
Default

You can use the SharkTuner on >MY87 cars to find which cylinders start to knock first..... no additional hardware required.

You can at least then remap the EZK to run safe.



Quick Reply: Boost, head gaskets and bmep



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:00 PM.